Skip to main content
Log in

Dilution costs, underinvestment, and utility regulation under asymmetric information

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses the problem faced by a regulated natural monopolist who must raise outside funds to finance socially desirable projects. We demonstrate that “fair rate of return” utility price regulation will lead to underinvestment incentives in the presence of asymmetric information between the firm and the capital markets regarding the firm's assets and future costs. This problem is especially severe when financing choice is restricted to equity. Underinvestment can be either completely eliminated by adjusting the allowed rate of return above the fair rate or reduced by switching to debt finance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Averch, H., and L. L. Johnson. 1962. “Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint.”American Economic Review 52: 1052–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. S., and J. Sobel. 1987. “Equilibrium Selection in Signalling Games.”Econometrica 55: 647–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P., and D. Besanko. 1987. “Commitment and Fairness in a Dynamic Regulatory Relation-ship.”Review of Economic Studies 54: 413–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. 1968. “Reasonable Rules for Rate Regulation.” InIssues in Theory, Practice and Public Policy, edited by A. Phillips: Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S.V., and J. Tschirhart. 1988.Natural Monopoly Regulation.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, I., and D. M. Kreps. 1987. “Signalling Games and Stable Equilibria.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 179–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, B. C. 1984. “Rate Base Selection and the Structure of Regulation.”RAND Journal of Economics 15: 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. 1938. “The General Welfare in Relation to Problems of Taxation and Railway and Utility Rates.”Econometrica 6: 242–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. L. 1972. “The Determinants of the Allowed Rate of Return in a Formal Regulatory Hearing.”Bell Journal of Economics 3: 632–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. L. 1974. “Inflation and Environmental Concerns: Structural Change in the Process of Public Utility Price Regulation.”Journal of Law and Economics 17: 291–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. R., and D. E. M. Sappington. 1989. “Regulatory Options and Price-Cap Regulation.”RAND Journal of Economics 20: 405–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, M. W. 1988. “Public Utilities’ Private Rights: Paying for Failed Nuclear Power Projects.”Regulation (No. 2): 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. M. 1977 ”Determinants of Corporate Borrowing.”Journal of Financial Economics 5: 147–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. M., and N. Majluf. 1984. “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms have Information Investors do not have.”Journal of Financial Economics 13:197–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osbon, A. D. 1983. “The Market Environment for Utility Securities.” InCurrent Issues in PublicUtility Economics: Essays in Honor of James C. Bonbright; edited by A.L. Danielsen and D.R. Kamerschen. Toronto: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, D. 1989. “Asymmetric Information, Incentives and Price-Cap Regulation.”RAND Journal of Economics 20: 392–404.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Support from the Center for the Study of Regulated Industry at Georgia State University is gratefully acknowledged. We have benefited from the comments of Victor Andrews, two anonymous reviewers, and the editor, Michael A. Crew. The usual disclaimer applies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kale, J.R., Noe, T.H. Dilution costs, underinvestment, and utility regulation under asymmetric information. J Regul Econ 7, 177–197 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062690

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062690

Keywords

Navigation