Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 333–352 | Cite as

An operational definition of prior criminal record

  • James F. Nelson
Article

Abstract

A variety of measures of prior criminal record is used to explain differences in incarceration for defendants arrested in New York State. The analysis suggests that (1) measures based upon arrest, conviction, or incarceration data are equally effective at explaining differences in incarceration percentages; (2) measures based upon counts do better in their logarithmic than in their arithmetic scales; (3) prior record is more closely related to incarceration for moderately serious than for serious or minor crimes; and (4) prior record is more closely related to incarceration for crimes that have a theft component than for crimes that do not. A composite prior record measure is developed that combines arrest and conviction data. It is easy to compute, yet it is as effective at explaining variation in incarceration as the most elaborate measures examined.

Key words

criminal record arc-sine transformation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, T. L. (1981). The influence of court location on type of criminal sentence: The rural-urban factor.J. Crim. Just. 9: 305–316.Google Scholar
  2. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice, Cambridge Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  3. Brantingham, P. L. (1985). Sentencing disparity: An analysis of judicial consistency.J. Quant. Criminol. 1: 281–305.Google Scholar
  4. Burke, P. J., and Turk, A. T. (1975). Factors affecting postarrest dispositions: A model for analysis.Soc. Prob. 22: 313–332.Google Scholar
  5. Castberg, A. D. (1971). The ethnic factor in criminal sentencing.West. Polit. Q. 24: 425–437.Google Scholar
  6. Chiricos, T. G., and Waldo, G. P. (1975). Socioeconomic status and criminal sentencing: An empirical assessment of a conflict proposition.Am. Sociol Rev. 40: 753–772.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, S. H., and Koch, G. G. (1976). The influence of income and other factors on whether criminal defendants go to prison.Law Soc. 11: 57–92.Google Scholar
  8. Crutchfield, R. D., and Bridges, G. S. (1985).Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Imprisonment: Final Report, Institute for Public Policy and Management, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  9. Draper, N., and Smith, H. (1981).Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd ed., John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Farrell, R. A., and Swigert, V. L. (1978). Prior offense record as a self-fulfilling prophecy.Law Soc. Rev. 12: 437–453.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, J. L. (1978). Race as a determinant of criminal sentences: A methodological critique and a case study.Law Soc. Rev. 12: 455–477.Google Scholar
  12. Green, E. G. (1961).Judicial Attitudes in Sentencing: A Study of the Factors Underlying the Sentencing Practices of the Criminal Court of Philadelphia, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Hagan, J. (1974). Extra-legal attributes and criminal sentencing: An assessment of a sociological viewpoint.Law Soc. Rev. 8: 357–383.Google Scholar
  14. Hagan, J., and Peterson, R. D. (1984). Changing conceptions of race: Towards an account of anomalous findings of sentencing research.Am. Social. Rev. 49: 56–70.Google Scholar
  15. Harig, T. (1984).New York State Criminal Justice Processing 1982, Vol. II Felony Offenders Disposed in 1982, Bureau of Criminal Justice Statistical Services, NYS, Albany, N.Y.Google Scholar
  16. Harig, T. (1985).New York State Criminal Justice Processing 1982. Misdemeanor Offenders Disposed in 1982, Bureau of Criminal Justice Statistical Services, NYS, Albany, N.Y.Google Scholar
  17. Humphrey, J. A., and Fogarty, T. J. (1987). Race and plea bargained outcomes: A research note.Soc. Forces 66: 177–182.Google Scholar
  18. Kelly, H. E. (1976). A comparison of defense strategy and race as influences in differential sentencing.Criminology 14: 241–249.Google Scholar
  19. Levin, M. A. (1972). Urban politics and judicial behavior.J. Legal Stud. 1: 193–221.Google Scholar
  20. Lizotte, A. J. (1978). Extra-legal factors in Chicago's criminal courts: Testing the conflict model of criminal justice.Soc. Problems 25: 564–580.Google Scholar
  21. Petersillia, J. (1983).Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System, Rand Publication Series, Rand Corp., Santa Monica, Calif.Google Scholar
  22. Peterson, R. D. (1988). Youthful offender designations and sentencing in the New York criminal courts.Soc. Problems 35: 111–130.Google Scholar
  23. Pope, C. E. (1976). The influence of social and legal factors on sentence dispositions: A preliminary analysis of offender-based transaction statistics.J. Crim. Just. 4: 203–221.Google Scholar
  24. Spohn, C., Gruhl, J., and Welch, S. (1981). The effect of race on sentencing: A re-examination of an unsettled question.Law Soc. Rev. 16: 71–88.Google Scholar
  25. Unnever, J. D., and Hembroff, L. A. (1988). The prediction of racial ethnic sentencing disparities: An expectation states approach.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 25: 53–82.Google Scholar
  26. Vining, A. R. (1983). Developing aggregate measures of disparity.Criminology 21: 233–253.Google Scholar
  27. Wheeler, S., Weisburg, D., and Bode, N. (1982). Sentencing the white-collar offender: Rhetoric and reality.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 641–659.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • James F. Nelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Criminal Justice ServicesOffice of Justice Systems AnalysisAlbany

Personalised recommendations