Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation and inference in pharmacokinetic models: The effectiveness of model reformulation and resampling methods for functions of parameters

  • Pharmacometrics
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well known that high parameter estimate correlations and asymptotic variance estimates can cause estimation and inference problems in the analysis of pharmacokinetic models. In this paper we show that analysis of three important functions of pharmacokinetic parameters, the half-life, mean residence time, and the area under the curve, can sometimes be greatly improved by reformulating the model to address collinearity and by using the bootstrap to form confidence intervals. The resultant estimators can be more accurate than the original ones, and resultant confidence intervals can be narrower. Of the three measures, the half-life estimator is much better behaved than the estimators of mean residence time and area under the curve under collinearity, suggesting that it (or measures like it) should be used more often.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. M. Bates and D. G. Watts.Nonlinear Regression Analysis and its Applications, Wiley, New York, 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. D. M. Allen. Parameter estimation for nonlinear models with emphasis on compartmental models.Biometrics 39:629–637 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. W. J. Westlake. Problems associated with analysis of pharmacokinetic models.J. Pharm. Sci. 60:882–885 (1971).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. H. G. Boxenbaum, S. Riegelman, and R. M. Elashoff. Statistical estimations in pharmacokinetics.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 2:123–148 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. P. M. Laskarzewski, D. L. Weiner, and L. Ott. A simulation study of parameter estimation in the one and two compartment models.J Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 10:317–334 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. G. Reich. On parameter redundancy in curve fitting of kinetic data. In L. Endrenyi (ed.),Kinetic Data Analysis: Design and Analysis of Enzyme and Pharmacokinetic Experiments, Plenum Press, New York, 1981, pp. 39–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. C. M. Metzler. Estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters: Statistical considerations.Pharmacol. Ther. 13:543–556 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. J. S. Simonoff and C.-L. Tsai. The use of guided reformulations when collinearities are present in nonlinear regression.Appl. Statist. 38:115–126 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Efron.The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. W. J. Kennedy, Jr. and J. E. Gentle.Statistical Computing, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. A. Belsley, E. Kuh, and R. E. Welsch.Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity, Wiley, New York, 1980.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. D. A. Freedman. Bootstrapping regression models.Ann. Statist. 9:1218–1228 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. A. Freedman and S. C. Peters. Bootstrapping a regression equation: Some empirical results.J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 79:97–106 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. V. Hinkley. Bootstrap methods.J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 50:321–337 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. S. Simonoff and C.-L. Tsai. Jackknifing and bootstrapping quasi-likelihood estimators.J. Statist. Comput. Simulation 30:213–232 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. C. F. J. Wu. Jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling methods in regression analysis (with discussion).Ann. Statist. 14:1261–1350 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. T. J. DiCiccio and J. P. Romano. A review of bootstrap confidence intervals.J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B 50:338–354 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. C. Davison, D. V. Hinkley, and E. Schechtman. Efficient bootstrap simulation.Biometrika 74:555–566 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. R. Gleason. Algorithms for balanced bootstrap simulations.Am. Statist. 42:263–266 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. S. Soofi. Effects of collinearity on information about regression coefficients.J. Economet. 43: in press.

  21. IMSL.User's Manual: STAT/LIBRARY, IMSL, Houston, TX, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. S. Weng. Comparison of generalized half-life and mean residence time derived from compartment analysis of pharmacokinetic data.Proc. ASA Biopharm. Sec. pp. 135–141 (1988).

  23. J. S. Simonoff and C.-L. Tsai. Jackknife-based estimators and confidence regions in nonlinear regression.Technometrics 28:103–112 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. L. B. Sheiner and S. L. Beal. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates from several least squares procedures: Superiority of extended least squares.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 13:185–201 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. L. Beal and L. B. Sheiner. Heteroscedastic nonlinear regression.Technometrics 30:327–388 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niedzwiecki, D., Simonoff, J.S. Estimation and inference in pharmacokinetic models: The effectiveness of model reformulation and resampling methods for functions of parameters. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 18, 361–377 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062274

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062274

Key words

Navigation