Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 191–218 | Cite as

Statistical tests of discrimination in punishment

  • Samuel L. MyersJr.


A method, adopted from the labor econometrics literature, is proposed for detecting discrimination in punishment. The method requires the separate estimation of time served and punishment probability equations for, say, whites and blacks. The coefficients from the white equation are used to predict the punishment blacks would receive if treated like whites. A test of no discrimination against blacks is a test that the black punishment predicted by the black equation is equal to the punishment predicted by the equation using the white coefficients but the black “endowments” or characteristics. A further test is proposed that evaluates the economic “efficiency” of disparities in punishment. The test is restricted to measuring the recidivism effect of equality of treatment in punishment. The discrimination test and the efficiency test are illustrated using the U.S. Board of Parole data for 1972. Statistically significant racial disparities in punishment are uncovered and are found to be economically inefficient.

Key words

racial discrimination punishment disparities residual discrimination recidivism prediction U.S. Board of Parole 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bell, D., and Lang, K. (1983). Intake disposition of juvenile offenders, Unpublished manuscript. School of Social Science, University of California at Irvine, Irvine.Google Scholar
  2. Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates.J. Hum. Resources 4: 436–455.Google Scholar
  3. Blau, F. D. (1984). Discrimination against women: Theory and evidence. In Darity, W. A., Jr. (ed.),Labor Economics: Modern Views, Maritinus Nijhoff, Boston.Google Scholar
  4. Block, M. K., and Heineke, J. M. (1975). A labor theoretic analysis of the criminal choice.Am. Econ. Rev. 65: 314–325.Google Scholar
  5. Blumstein, A. (1982). On the racial disproportionality of United States' prison population.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 73: 1259–1281.Google Scholar
  6. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Marhn, S. E., and Torry, M. H., (1983).Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Brilmayer, L. (1982). Comment.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 77: 789–790.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, R. J. (1982). Estimating wage discrimination in the labor market.J. Hum. Resources 71: 606–622.Google Scholar
  9. Chaiken, J. M., and Chaiken, M. R. (1982a).Varieties of Criminal Behavior, R-2814-NIJ, Rand, Santa Monica, Calif.Google Scholar
  10. Chiaken, J. M., and Chiaken, M. R., with Peterson, J. E. (1982b).Varieties of Criminal Behavior: Summary and Policy Implications, R-2814/1NIJ, Rand, Santa Monica, Calif.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J., and Tonry, M. (1983). Sentencing reforms and their impact. In Blumstein, A.,et al. (eds.),Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 405–459.Google Scholar
  12. Duncan, O. D. (1967). Inheritance of poverty or inheritance of race? In Moynihan, D. P. (ed.),On Understanding Poverty, Basic Books, New York, pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
  13. Elion, V. H., and Megargee, E. I. (1979). Racial identity, length of incarceration, and parole decision making.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 16: 232–235.Google Scholar
  14. Feagin, J. R. (1975). Institutional discrimination: A working paper. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.Google Scholar
  15. Finkelstein, M. O. (1980). The judicial reception of multiple regression in studies in race and discrimination cases.Columbia Law Rev. 80: 737–754.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, F. M., and Kadane, J. B. (1983). Empirically based sentencing guidelines and ethical considerations. In Blumstein, A.,et al. (eds.),Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 184–194.Google Scholar
  17. Garber, S., Klepper, S., and Nagin, D. (1983). The role of extralegal factors in determining criminal case disposition. In Blumstein, A.,et al. (eds.),Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 129–183.Google Scholar
  18. Garfinkel, I., and Haveman, R. (1979).Earnings Capacity, Poverty, and Inequality, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Gibson, J. (1978). Race as a determinant of criminal sentences: A methodological critique and a case study.Law Soc. Rev. 12: 455–478.Google Scholar
  20. Hagan, J., and Bumiller, K. (1983). Making sense of sentencing: A review and critique of sentencing research. In Blumstein, A.,et al. (eds.),Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 305–459.Google Scholar
  21. Hashimoto, M., and Kochin, L. (1980). A bias in the statistical estimation of the effects of discrimination.Econ. Inquiry 18: 478–486.Google Scholar
  22. Hindelang, M. J. (1978). Equality under the law.Law Soc. Rev. 12: 455–478.Google Scholar
  23. Hindelang, M. J. (1979). Race and involvement in common law personal crimes.Am. Sociol. Rev. 43: 93–109.Google Scholar
  24. Hoffman, P. (1983). Screening for risk: A revised salient factor score (SFS).J. Crim. Just. 11: 539–541.Google Scholar
  25. Hoffman, P., and Meierhoeffer, B. (1979). Post-release arrest experience of federal prisoners: A six-year follow-up.J. Crim. Just. 7: 193–216.Google Scholar
  26. Kamalich, R. F., and Polachek, S. W. (1982). Discrimination: Fact or fiction? An examination using an alternative approach.South. Econ. J. 49: 450–461.Google Scholar
  27. Kaye, D. (1982). Statistical evidence of discrimination.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 77: 773–783.Google Scholar
  28. Klepper, S., Nagin, D., and Tierney, L.-J. (1983). Discrimination in the criminal justice system: A critical appraisal of the literature. In Blumstein, A.,et al. (eds.),Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 55–128.Google Scholar
  29. Lizotte, A. J. (1977). Extra-legal factors in Chicago's criminal courts: Testing the confiict model of criminal justice.Soc. Problems 25(5): 564–580.Google Scholar
  30. Marquis, K. H., Jr., with Ebener, P. (1981).Quality of Prisoner Self-Reports: Arrests and Convictions Response Errors, R-2637-DOJ, Rand, Santa Monica, Calif.Google Scholar
  31. Myers, S. L., Jr. (1979). The incidence of justice. In Gray, C. M. (ed.),The Cost of Crime, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.Google Scholar
  32. Myers, S. L., Jr. (1980a). The rehabilitation effect of punishment.Econ. Inquiry 18: 353–366.Google Scholar
  33. Myers, S. L., Jr. (1980b). Black-white differentials in crime rates.Rev. Black Polit. Econ. 10: 133–152.Google Scholar
  34. Myers, S. L., Jr. (1983). Estimating the economic model of crime: Employment versus punishment effects.Q. J. Econ. 48: 157–166.Google Scholar
  35. Neyman, J., and Scott, E. (1960). Correction for bias introduced by transformation of variables.Ann. Math. Stat. 31: 643–655.Google Scholar
  36. Peterson, R., and Hagan, J. (1984). Changing conceptions of race: Toward an account of anomalous findings of sentencing research.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 56–70.Google Scholar
  37. Sellin, T. (1976).Slavery and the Penal System, Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Theil, H. (1971).Principles of Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Witte, A. D. (1980). Estimating the economic model of crime and individual data.Q. J. Econ. 44: 57–84.Google Scholar
  40. Witte, A. D. (1983). Estimating the economic model of crime: Reply.Q. J. Econ. 48: 167–175.Google Scholar
  41. Wolfgang, M. E., and Cohen, B. (1970).Crime and Race: Conceptions and Misconceptions, Institute of Human Relations Press, American Jewish Committee, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel L. MyersJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Public and International Affairs and University Center for Social and Urban ResearchUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh

Personalised recommendations