Skip to main content
Log in

Preconditioning second-order elliptic operators: Condition numbers and the distribution of the singular values

  • Published:
Journal of Scientific Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work deals with theH 1 condition numbers and the distribution of theB-singular values of the preconditioned operators {B −1h Ah}0{ith<1, whereA h andB h are conforming finite element discretizations of second-order elliptic operatorsA andB, respectively.B is also assumed to be self-adjoint and positive definite. As an improvement of the results of Manteuffel and Parter (1990), we give here an interval on which these singular valuescluster. Such an interval is called aneffective asymptotic range in this paper. In particular, if the leading part ofB is the same as the leading part ofA, then the singular values cluster aboutσ=“1.” Finally, we discuss the effects of replacingB −1 h by an approximation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselone, P. M. (1971).Collectively Compact Operator Approximation Theory and Applications to Integral Equations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselone, P. M., and Palmer, T. W. (1968). Spectral analysis of collectively compact strongly convergent operator sequences,Pac. J. Math. 25, 423–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, S. F., Manteuffel, T. A., and Saylor, P. E. (1990). A taxonomy for conjugate gradient methods,SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 27, 1542–1568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babuška, I., and Aziz, A. K. (1972). Survey lectures on the mathematical foundations of the finite element method, inThe Mathematical Foundations of the Finite Element Method with Applications to Partial Differential Equations, A. K. Aziz (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 3–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, R. E., and Dupont, T. (1981). An optimal order process for solving finite element equations,Math. Comput. 36, 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, A., Goldstein, C. I., and Turkel, E. (1983). An iterative method for the Helmholtz equation,J. Comput. Phys. 49, 443–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, A., Goldstein, C. I., and Turkel, E. (1985). The numerical solution of the Helmholtz equation for wave propagation problems in underwater acoustics,Comput. Math. Appl. 11, 655–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramble, J. H., and Pasciak, J. E. (1984). Preconditioned iterative methods for nonself-adjoint or indefinite elliptic boundary value problems, inUnification of Finite Elements, H. Kardestuncer (ed.), Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramble, J. H., and Pasciak, J. E. (1987). New convergence estimates for multigrid algorithms,Math. Comput. 49, 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramble, J. H., Pasciak, J. E., Wang, J., and Xu, J. (1991). Convergence estimates for multigrid algorithms without regularity assumptions, to appear.

  • Bramble, J. H., Pasciak, J. E., and Xu, J. (1991). The analysis of multigrid algorithms with non-nested spaces or non-inherited quadratic forms,Math. Comput. 56, to appear.

  • Ciarlet, P. G. (1978).The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, N., Mandel, J., and Parter, S. V. (1988). On the role of regularity in multigrid methods, inMultigrid Methods, Proceedings of 3rd Copper Mountain Conference, S. McCormick with J. Dendy, J. Mandel, S. Parter, and J. Ruge (eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, K. O. (1948). On the perturbation of continuous spectra,Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 1, 361–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, C. I., Manteuffel, T. A., and Parter, S. V. (1991). Preconditioning and boundary conditions withoutH 2 estimates:L 2 condition numbers and the distribution of the singular values, to appear.

  • Halmos, P. R. (1951).Introduction to Hilbert Space and the Theory of Multiplicity, Chelsea, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lions, J. L., and Magenes, E. (1972).Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications I, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, P., and Tismenetsky, M. (1985).The Theory of Matrices, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, J., and Parter, S. V. (1990). On the multigridF-cycle, Appl. Math. Comput. 37, 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manteuffel, T. A., and Parter, S. V. (1990). Preconditioning and boundary conditions,SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 27, 656–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, S. F. (ed.) (1982). Multigrid methods, inFrontiers in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 3, SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad, Y., and Schultz, M. (1986). GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems,SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7, 856–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. (1971).Iterative Solution of Large Linear Systems, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Saul Abarbandel on the occasion of this 60th birthday.

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant No. DMS-8913091.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parter, S.V., Wong, SP. Preconditioning second-order elliptic operators: Condition numbers and the distribution of the singular values. J Sci Comput 6, 129–157 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062117

Key words

Navigation