Abstract
A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of hypersensitivity to adrenergic stimulation following abrupt withdrawal of chronic β blockade was developed. The model employs the Hill equation, a term which describes the competition between isoproterenol and l- propranolol for β receptors, and a kinetic term which characterizes the appearance and disappearance rates of up-regulated β receptors. The model predicted peak chronotropic hyperresponsiveness to isoproterenol 48 hr following abrupt withdrawal of chronic treatment with daily propranolol doses of 160 mg, and a drug half-life of 3.5 hr. The model also predicted that increasing the dose rate and prolonging the half-life of propranolol delayed and decreased the extent of adrenergic hypersensitivity. The time-course of adrenergic hypersensitivity simulated by our model was in excellent agreement with that observed in studies which were published earlier by our laboratory. The model underestimated the extent of adrenergic hypersensitivity. The results of our simulation are consistent with a β agonist-receptor-effector system, which involves spare receptors, amplification of response by second and third messengers, and β agonist-antagonist-induced receptor regulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- R :
-
Unoccupied receptor concentration
- A :
-
Unbound agonist concentration surroundingR
- RA :
-
Receptor-agonist complex concentration
- k 1:
-
Association rate constant
- k 2:
-
Dissociation rate constant
- B :
-
β receptor density
- B max :
-
Maximumβ receptor density
- A 50 :
-
A at which B/Bmax is 0.5
- E :
-
Intensity of response
- E max :
-
Maximum intensity of response
- Ce :
-
Unbound blood concentration of the agonist eutomer
- Ce 50 :
-
Ce at whichE/E max is 0.5
- γ :
-
Slope of the response-concentration curve
- e :
-
Dimensionless proportionality factor denoting power of agonist to produce a response
- I :
-
Unbound antagonist concentration surroundingR
- RI :
-
Receptor-antagonist complex concentration
- KI :
-
Equilibrium dissociation constant ofRI
- Ei :
-
Intensity of response to the agonist in presence of antagonist prior to up-regulation
- Ci :
-
Unbound blood concentration of the antagonist
- Ki :
-
Ci at whichEi/E max is 0.5
- Cij :
-
Coefficient of theCi, time curve
- λij :
-
Slope of theCi, time curve
- t :
-
Time following administration of the antagonist
- N :
-
Number of doses of the antagonist administered
- τ :
-
Dosing interval
- Cb :
-
Blood concentration of the antagonist
- fu :
-
Unbound fraction of antagonist in blood
- B: P :
-
Blood to plasma ratio
- B∼ max :
-
Sum of Bmax and density of antagonist-induced up-regulatedβ receptors
- fr :
-
Fractional increase inβ receptor density, Bmax Bmax)/Bmax
- kd :
-
Disappearance rate constant of antagonist-induced up-regulatedβ receptors
- T :
-
Duration of antagonist treatment
- t′ :
-
Time following withdrawal of antagonist treatment
- E′ :
-
Intensity of response to agonist in presence of antagonist and up-regulated receptors
- E hr :
-
Heart rate in presence of isoproterenol
- Diso :
-
Dose of isoproterenol
- Do25:
-
Dose of isoproterenol which produces a 25-BPM increase in heart rate in absence of propranolol
- ΔHR:
-
Isoproterenol-induced change in heart rate in absence of propranolol
- ΔHR′:
-
Isoproterenol-induced change in heart rate in presence of propranolol
- S :
-
Slope of the Diso -@#@ ΔHR curve
- INT :
-
Intercept of the Diso-ΔHR curve
- HR rest :
-
Resting heart rate
- HR para :
-
HR rest under parasympathetic control
- HR sym :
-
HR rest under sympathetic control
- Pin :
-
Percentage inhibition ofHR sym induced by propranolol
- Pin max :
-
maximal fractional inhibition ofHR sym induced by propranolol
- Ehr :
-
Heart rate response to isoproterenol, when receptors are upregulated
- Rhr :
-
Percentage change in isoproterenol-induced tachycardia above control
References
J. G. Wagner. Kinetics of pharmacologic response. I. Proposed relationships between response and drug concentration in the intact animal and man.J. Theor. Biol. 20:171–201 (1968).
N. H. G. Holford and L. B. Sheiner. Kinetics of pharmacologic response.Pharmcol. Ther. 16:144–166 (1982).
W. Haefely. Biological basis of drug-induced tolerance, rebound, and dependence. Contribution of recent research on benzodiazepines.Pharmacopsychiatry. 19:353–361 (1986).
D. R. Sibley and R. J. Lefkowitz. Molecular mechanisms of receptor desensitization using theμ-adrenergic receptor-coupled adenylate cyclase system as a model.Nature 317:124–129 (1985).
T. K. Harden. Agonist-induced desensitization of theβ adrenoreceptor-linked adenylate cyclase.Pharmacol. Rev. 35:5–32 (1983).
J. G. Gerber and A. S. Nies. Abrupt withdrawal of cardiovascular drugs.New Engl. J. Med. 301:1234–1235 (1979).
B. N. C. Prichard, B. Tomlinson, R. J. Waiden, and P. Bhattacharjee. Theβ-adrenergic blockade withdrawal phenomenon.J. Cardiol. Pharmacol. 5:S56-S62 (1983).
K. A. Neve and P. B. Molinoff. Effects of chronic administration of agonists and antagonists on the density of beta-adrenergic receptors.Am. J. Cardiol. 57:17F-22F (1986).
R. D. Aarons, A. S. Nies, J. G. Gerber, and P. B. Molinoff. Decreased beta-adrenergic receptor density on human lymphocytes after chronic treatment with agonists.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 224:1–6 (1983).
J. F. Tohmeh and P. E. Cryer. Biphasic adrenergic modulation ofβ-adrenergic receptor in man.J. Clin. Invest. 65:836–840 (1980).
R. D. Aarons, A. S. Nies, J. Gal, L. R. Hegstrand, and P. B. Molinoff. Elevation ofβ-adrenergic receptor density in human lymphocytes after propranolol administration.J. Clin. Invest. 65:949–957 (1980).
H. Boudoulas, R. P. Lewis, R. E. Kates, and G. Dalamangas. Hypersensitivity to adrenergic stimulation after propranolol withdrawal in normal subjects.Ann. Intern. Med. 87:434–436 (1977).
H. Boudoulas, B. M. Beaver, R. E. Kates, and R. P. Lewis. Pharmacodynamics of inotropic and chronotropic responses to oral therapy with propranolol.Chest 73:146–153 (1978).
T. P. Kenakin. Drug-receptor theory. InPharmacologic Analysis of Drug-Receptor Interaction, Raven Press, NY, 1987, pp. 12–17.
A. Levitzki. Receptor occupancy and “spare receptors”. InReceptors: A quantitative Approach, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, 1984, pp. 91–101.
Y. Cheng and W. H. Prusoff. Relationship between the inhibition constant (Ki) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction.Biochem. Pharmacol. 22:3099–3108 (1973).
R. D. Aarons and P. B. Molinoff. Changes in the density ofβ-adrenergic receptors in rat lymphocytes, heart and lung after chronic treatment with propranolol.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 221:439–443 (1982).
G. Hedberg, J. G. Gerber, A. S. Nies, B. B. Wolfe, and P. B. Molinoff. Effects of pindolol and propranolol onβ-adrenergic receptors on human lymphocytes.J. Pharmacol Exp. Ther. 239:117–122 (1986).
O.-E. Brodde, A. Daul, N. Stuka, N. O'Hara, and U. Borchard. Effects ofβ-adrenoreceptor antagonist administration onβ 2-adrenoreceptor density in human lymphocytes.Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmakol. 328:417–422 (1985)
O.-E. Brodde, R. Schemuth, M. Brinkmann, S. L. Wang, A. Daul, and U. Borchard. Beta-Adrenoreceptor antagonists (non-selective as well asβ 1,-selective) with partial agonistic activity decreaseβ 2-adrenoceptor density in human lymphocytes.Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmakol. 333:130–138 (1986).
C. R. Cleaveland, R. E. Rangno, and D. G. Shand. A standardized isoproterenol sensitivity test.Arch. Intern. Med. 130:47–52 (1972).
D. S. Goldstein, R. Zimlichman, R. Stull, and H. R. Keiser. Plasma catecholamine and hemodynamic responses during isoproterenol infusions in humans.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 40:233–238 (1986).
R. M. Berne and M. N. Levy. Regulation of the heartbeat. InCardiovascular Physiology, 5th ed., C. V. Mosby, St. Louis, MO, 1986, pp. 76–104.
D. M. Koernhauser, A. J. J. Wood, R. E. Vestal, G. R. Wilkinson, R. A. Branch, and D. G. Shand. Biological determinants of propranolol disposition in man.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 23:165–174 (1978).
C. von Bahr, J. Hermansson, and K. Tawara. Plasma levels of (+) and (−)-propranolol and 4-hydroxy propranolol after administration of racemic propranolol in man.Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 14:79–82 (1982).
M. C. Houston and R. Hodge. Beta-adrenergic blocker withdrawal syndromes in hyper-tension and other cardiovascular diseases.Am. Heart. J. 116:515–523 (1988).
L. T. Williams, R. Snyderman, and R. J. Lefkowitz. Identification of beta-adrenergic receptors in human lymphocytes by (−)-3H-alprenolol binding.J. Clin. Invest. 57:149–155 (1976).
O.-E. Brodde, R. Kretsch, I. Katsumi, H. R. Zerkowski, and J. C. Reidemeister. Humanβ-adrenoceptors: relation of myocardial and lymphocyteβ-adrenoceptor density.Science 231:1584–1585 (1986).
E. P. Gordon, M. R. Bristow, J. A. Laser, W. A. Minobe, and M. B. Fowler. Correlation betweenβ-adrenergic receptors in human lymphocyte and heart.Circulation 68:(Suppl. 3):99 (1983).
J. P. Longabaugh, D. E. Vatner, and C. J. Homey. The beta-adrenergic receptor/adenylate cyclase system. In H. A. Fozzardet al. (eds.).,The Heart and Cardiovascular System, Raven Press, NY, 1986, pp. 1097–1117.
A. Levitzki. From epinepherine to cAMP.Science 241:800–806 (1988).
R. R. Miller, H. G. Olson, E. A. Amsterdam, and D. T. Mason. Propranolol withdrawal rebound phenomenon.New Engl. J. Med. 393:416–418 (1975).
D. G. Shand, and J. J. A. Wood. Editorial: Propranolol withdrawal syndrome-Why?Circulation 58:202–203 (1978).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by a grant from the American Heart Association, Central Ohio Chapter.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lima, J.J., Krukemyer, J.J. & Boudoulas, H. Drug- or hormone-induced adaptation: Model of adrenergic hypersensitivity. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 17, 347–364 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061901
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061901