Skip to main content
Log in

Six scenarios for the future of systems “problem solving”

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper six scenarios for the future of systems “problem solving” are investigated in order to ascertain whether an approach can be identified (a) that offers prospects for the long-term survival and success of systems problem solving in practice and (b) that does this without incorporating theoretical contradictions. The six approaches come under the four class headings pragmatism, isolationism, imperialism, and pluralism. The theoretical foundations of each approach are explored in a discursive fashion. This makes explicit to systems practitioners the underlying principles on which their activities are overlaid and puts such approaches into the theoretical context of the six approaches identified herein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1974). The systems revolution.Long Range Plan. 7, 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1981).Creating the Corporate Future, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atthill, C. (1975).Decisions: West Oil Distribution, BP Educational Service, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. (1987). Choosing design methods. InProceedings of the 31st Meeting of the ISGSR, Budapest, Hungary, June, pp. 56–63.

  • Beer, S. (1967).Cybernetics and Management, 2nd ed., English Universities Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1979).The Heart of the Enterprise, J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1981).Brain of the Firm, 2nd ed., J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1985).Diagnosing the Systems for Organisations, J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. (1979).Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1980). Are organisations machines?Futures 12, 421–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, K. S. (1985). Coping with uncertainty in planning.J. A. Plan. Assoc. 51, 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daellenbach, H. G., George, J. A., and McNickle, D. C. (1983).Introduction to Operations Research Techniques, 2nd ed. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. K., and Flood, R. L. (1987). Management of technological change: Systems theory or systems technology?Proceedings of the 31st meeting of the ISGSR, Budapest, June, pp. 316–367.

  • Flood, R. L. (1987). Complexity: A definition by construction of a conceptual framework.Syst. Res. 4(3), 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1988a). The need for a substantive soft systems language.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 15, 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1988b). Situational complexity: Modelling and methodology.Trans. Inst. Meas. Contrl. 10(3), 122–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1988c). Unleashing the “open system” metaphor.Syst. Pract. 1, 313–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1989). Archaeology of (systems) inquiry.Syst. Pract. 2, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Carson, E. R. (1988).Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1988). Cybernetics and organisation theory: A critical review.Cybernet. Syst. 19(1), 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1973).Sigmund Freud. 2. New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guertz, J. L. A., Hart, S. L., and Caplan, M. S. (1985). Decision techniques and social research: A contingency framework for problem-solving.Hum. Syst. Manage. 5, 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamwee, J. (1986). Personal communication to R. L. Flood.

  • Hoos, I. (1972).Systems Analysis in Public Policy: A Critique, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1982). The nature of soft systems thinking: The work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1985). Social systems theory and practice: The need for a critical approach.Int. J. Gen. Syst. Res. 10, 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1987a). Present positions and future prospects in management science.Omega 15(6), 455–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1987b). New directions in management science. In Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds).,New Directions in Management Science, Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1988). Systems methods for organisational analysis and design.Syst. Res. 5(3) (in press).

  • Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 35, 473–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janes, F. R. (1988). Interpretive Structural Modelling: A methodology for structuring complex issues.Trans Inst. Meas. Contrl. 10(3), 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, G. (1969). The systems approach. In Beishon, J., and Peters, G. (eds.),Systems Behaviour, 2nd ed., Harper Row, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1787).Critique of Pure Reason, Macmillan, London (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976).Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, P. (1988). A methodology for methodology choice.Syst. Res. 5(1), 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir, G. (1985).Architecture of Systems Problem Solving, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1975).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, R. (1979).The Rise of Systems Theory, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1969).The Psychology of Science, H. Regnery, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. O., and Mitroff, I. I. (1981).Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattesich, R. (1978).Instrumental Reasoning and Systems Methodology—An Epistemology of the Applied and Social Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • M'Pherson, P. K. (1974). A perspective on systems science and systems philosophy.Futures 6(3), 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • M'Pherson, P. K. (1980). Systems engineering: An approach to whole systems design,Radio Electron. Eng. 50(11/12), 545–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • M'Pherson, P. K. (1981). A framework for systems engineering design.Radio Electron. Eng. 51(2), 59–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1983).Images of Organisation, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, J. (1977).The Checkland Methodology: A Reader's Guide, 2nd ed., Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, J. (1979). Anti-GST: An evolutionary manifesto. Paper for the Silver Anniversary Meeting of the Society for General Systems Research.

  • Oliga, J. (1988). Methodological foundations of systems methodologies.Syst. Pract. 1, pp. 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. (1985).Redirections in Organisational Analysis, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, D. J. (1985). Root definitions and reality in manufacturing systems.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 12, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, F. J., and Dickson, W. J. (1939).Management and the Workers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F. (ed.) (1974).The Structure of Scientific Theory, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, R. (1987). Operational research and systems analysis—science in action, applicable mathematics, or social engineering? In Trappl, R. (ed.),Cybernetics and Systems 1986, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983).Critical Heuristics of Social Planning, Haupt, Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988). Systems practice: Building the bridge between systems thinking and practical philosophy.Syst. Pract. 1, 137–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N. (1976).Societal Systems: Planning Policy and Complexity, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1922).Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953).Philosophical Investigations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodburn, I. (1985). Some developments in the building of conceptual models.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 12, 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flood, R.L. Six scenarios for the future of systems “problem solving”. Systems Practice 2, 75–99 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061618

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061618

Key words

Navigation