Abstract
Several streams of cybernetic thinking lead to the notion that there may exist systems of a higher logical order than that of manmade organisation. Such systems would be autopoietic and, in principle, beyond human control. Man and his institutions would be but components of such systems. The accelerated growth of institutions and the connections between them facilitated by the IT revolution makes the realization of such systems more probable at this time. The implications for systems practice are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, W. R. (1952).Design for a Brain, Chapman and Hall, London.
Baumgartner, T., Burns, T. R., and De Ville, P. (1978). The dialectics of social action and system structuring. In Geyer, R. F., and Van der Zouwen, J. (eds.),Sociocybernetics, Martinus Nijhoff, Lieden, pp. 27–54.
Beer, S. (1975).Platform for Change, John Wiley & Sons, London.
Beer, S. (1979).The Heart of the Enterprise, John Wiley & Sons, London.
Beer, S. (1980). Preface to autopoiesis: The organisation of the living. In Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J. (eds.),Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realisation of the Living, D. Reidel, Dortrecht, pp. 63–72.
Beer, S. (1985).Diagnosing the System, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
Ben Eli, M. U. (1981). Self-organization, autopoiesis and evolution. In Zeleny, M. (ed.),Autopoiesis: A Theory of Living Organisation, North-Holland, Oxford and New York, pp. 169–182.
Braten, S. S. (1986). The third position; beyond artificial and autopoietic reduction. In Geyer, F., and Van der Zouwen, J. (eds.),Sociocybernetic Paradoxes, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 193–205.
Checkland, P. (1987). Address to the 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Conant, R., and Ashby, W. R. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system.Int. J. Syst. Sci. 1(2), 89–97.
Davies, P. (1987).The Cosmic Blueprint, Hienemann, London.
Durkin, J. E. (1980). The structure of autonomy boundarying in living groups. In Banathy, B. H. (ed.),Systems Science and Science, Society for General Systems Research, Louisville, KY, pp. 634–645.
Espejo, R. (1987). Cybernetic method to study organisations. InProceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary, Vol. 1, pp. 323–336.
Flood, R. L., and Robinson, S. A. (1989). Analogy and metaphor in systems and sybernetic methodology.Cybernet. Syst. 20(1) (in press).
Francois, C. (1987). Consequences of Godel's theorem for the metasystemic paradigm. In Van Gigch, J. P. (ed.),Decision Making About Decision Making, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, England, and Cambridge, MA, pp. 67–76.
George, F. H. (1970). Cybernetics and industry. In Rose, J. (ed.),Progress in Cybernetics, Proceedings of the First International Congress of Cybernetics, London, 1969, Gordon and Breach, London, pp. 113–215.
Gorelik, G. (1975). Principal ideas of Bogdanov's tektology. In Rapaport, A. (ed.),General Systems, XX, pp. 3–13.
Hacking, I. (1981). Lakatos's philosophy of science. In Hacking, I. (ed.),Scientific Revolutions, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 128–143.
Hume, D. (1739). Of the skeptical and other systems of philosophy. Treatise of Human Nature, Book I, Part iv, Sect. ii. In Flew, A. (ed.) (1962).David Hume: On Human Nature and Understanding, Collier Macmillan, London, pp. 219–245.
Jackson, M. C. (1987). New directions in management science. In Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.),New Directions in Management Science, Gower, Aldershot, England, pp. 133–164.
Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of system methodologies.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 35, 473–486.
Kauffman, S. A. (1984). Emergent properties in random complex automata.Physica 10D, 145–155.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University Press, Chicago.
Kuhn, T. S. (1981). A function for thought experiments. In Hacking, I. (ed.),Scientific Revolutions, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 6–27.
Luhman, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In Geyer, F., and Van der Zouwen, J. (eds.),Sociocybernetic Paradoxes, Sage, Beverley Hills, CA, pp. 172–192.
Maruyama, M. (1963). The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes.Am. Sci. 51, 164–179, 250–256.
Maruyama, M. (1980). Mindscapes and science theories.Curr. Anthropol. 21, 589–599. [Reprinted in Ragade, R. K. (ed.),General Systems, XXVI, pp. 41–60.]
Maruyama, M. (1987). Communication between mindscape types. In Van Gigch, J. P. (ed.),Decision Making About Decision Making, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, England, and Cambridge, MA, pp. 79–98.
Maturana, H. R. (1981). Autopoiesis. In Zeleny, M. (ed.),Autopoiesis: A Theory of Living Organisation, North-Holland, New York and Oxford, pp. 21–23.
Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J. (1975). Autopoietic systems: A characterisation of the living organisation.Biological Computer Laboratory Report 9.4, University of Illinois, Urbana.
Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J. (1980).Autopoiesis: The Organisation of the Living, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, and London.
Miller, J. G. (1965). Living systems; Basic concepts.Behav. Sci. 10, 193–237.
Miller, J. G. (1978).Living Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Miller, J. G. (1986). Can systems theory generate testable hypotheses? from Talcott Parsons to living systems theory.Syst. Res. 3(2), 73–84.
Mirham, D., and Mirham, G. A. (1985). The chronology of the etymology of “cybernetics.”Syst. Res. 2(2), 165–167.
Pask, G. (1960).An Approach to Cybernetics, Hutchinson, London.
Pask, G. (1970). Cybernetics in the behavioural sciences; The cybernetics of behaviour and cognition, extending the meaning of “goal.” In Rose, J. (ed.),Progress in Cybernetics. Proceedings of the First International Congress of Cybernetics, London, 1969, Gordon and Breach, London, pp. 15–44.
Pask, G. (1978). A conversation theoretic approach to social systems. In Geyer, R. F., and Van der Zouwen, J. (eds.),Sociocybernetics, Martinus Nijhoff, Lieden, Boston, and London, pp. 15–26.
Pask, G. (1980). The limits of togetherness. In Lavington, S. H. (ed.),Information Processing, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 999–1012. (Reprinted in Ragade, R. (ed.),General Systems, XXV, pp. 144–157.)
Pask, G. (1981). Organisational closure of potentially conscious systems. In Zeleny, M. (ed.),Autopoiesis: A Theory of Living Organisation, North-Holland, Oxford and New York, pp. 265–308.
Pask, G., Scott, B. C. E., and Kalliourdis, D. (1973). A theory of conversations and individuals; exemplified by the learning process on CASTE.Int. J. Man-Machine Stud. 5, 443–566.
Perrow, C. (1984).Normal Accidents; Living with High-Risk Technologies, Basic Books, New York.
Popper, K. (1972).Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Prigogine, I. (1980).From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences, Freeman, San Francisco.
Robb, F. F. (1985a). Towards a “better” scientific theory of human organisations.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 36(6), 433–466.
Robb, F. F. (1985b). Thought experiments on human activity systems. InProceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Society for General Systems Research, Los Angeles, pp. 914–917.
Robb, F. F. (1987). MIS: A distorting lens? Paper to the 29th Annual Conference of the Operational Research Society, Edinburgh.
Robb, F. F., and Brown, T. A. (1987a). The machine intelligence family.Account. Mag. 91(971), 50–52.
Robb, F. F., and Brown, T. A. (1987b). The accountant and the intelligent machine.Account. Mag. 91(972), 38–39.
Rosen, R. (1986).Anticipatory Systems, Pergamon, London.
Russell, B. (1946).A History of Western Philosophy, George Allan and Unwin, London.
Simons, G. (1987).Eco-Computer, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Thom, R. (1975).Structural Stability and Morphogenesis, Benjamin, Reading, MA.
Tinker, T. (1986). Metaphor or reification: Are radical humanists really libertarian anarchists?J. Man. Sci. 23(4), 363–383.
Tritton, D. J. (1986). Ordered and chaotic motion of a forced spherical pendulum.Eur. J. Phys. 7, 162.
Troncale, L. (1985). The future of general systems research; Obstacles, potentials and case studies.Syst. Res. 2(1), 43–84.
Van Gigch, J. P. (1987). The metasystem, rationalities and information. In Van Gigch, J. P. (ed.),Decision Making About Decision Making, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, England, and Cambridge, MA, pp. 227–239.
Varela, F. J. (1981). Describing the logic of the living. In Zeleny, M. (ed.),Autopoiesis: A Theory of Living Organisation, North-Holland, New York and Oxford, pp. 36–48.
Warfield, J. M. (1982). Organisations and systems learning. In Warfield, J. M. (ed.),General Systems, XXVII, pp. 5–74.
Weick, K. E. (1979).The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed., Random House, New York.
Wiener, N. (1948).Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and in the Machine, Wiley, New York.
Wiener, N. (1949).Interpolation, Extrapolation and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series with Engineering Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Wise, J. A., and Debons, A. (1987).Information Systems Failure Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Heidleberg.
Wittgenstein, L. (1945). Philosophical investigations I, 43. In Anscombe, G. E. M., Rhees, R., and von Wright, G. H. (eds.), Anscombe, G. E. M. (trans.),Ludwig Wittgenstein (1967), 3rd ed. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robb, F.F. Cybernetics and suprahuman autopoietic systems. Systems Practice 2, 47–74 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061617
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061617