Skip to main content
Log in

Importance of the use of the appropriate pharmacokinetic model to analyzein vivo enzyme constants

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Throughout the literature, enzyme constants have been derived by utilizing in vivodata and indirectly assuming that these data were described by the one-compartment open model. However, many drugs are probably best described by a two-compartment open model with Michaelis-Menten elimination kinetics. Simulated data, which obey the two-compartment open model with Michaelis-Menten elimination, and which illustrate some of the interesting properties of such models, are presented. Treatment of two-compartment data by one-compartment analysis is shown to result in a serious distortion of enzyme parameters (V m ,K m ).For data which obey the two-compartment open model, estimation of the Michaelis-Menten constant (K m )and the maximum velocity (V m )by one-compartment analysis cannot be theoretically justified and therefore should be avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. B. Bischoff and R. L. Dedrick. Thiopental pharmacokinetics.J. Pharm. Sci. 57: 1346–1351 (1968).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Gerber and J. G. Wagner. Explanation of dose-dependent decline of diphenylhydantoin plasma levels by fitting to the integrated form of the Michaelis-Menten equation.Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 3: 455–466 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. G. Wagner and J. A. Patel. Variations in absorption and elimination rate of ethyl alcohol in a single subject.Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 4: 61–76 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Levy, T. Tsuchiya, and L. P. Amsel. Salicylate kinetics in man.Clin. Pharmacol. Therap. 13: 258–268 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. P. Von Wartburg, J. L. Bethune, and B. L. Vallee. Liver alcohol dehydrogenase: Kinetic and physicochemical properties.Biochemistry 3: 1775–1782 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. H. Blair and B. L. Vallee. Some catalytic properties of human liver alcohol dehydrogenase.Biochemistry 5: 2026–2034 (1966).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. R. L. Dedrick and D. D. Forrester. Blood flow limitations in interpreting Michaelis constants for ethanol oxidationin vivo.Biochem. Pharmacol. 22: 1133–1140 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. H. N. Christensen and G. A. Palmer.Enzyme Kinetics, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1967, pp. 101–103.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by Public Health Service Grant 5-P11-GM15559.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sedman, A.J., Wagner, J.G. Importance of the use of the appropriate pharmacokinetic model to analyzein vivo enzyme constants. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 2, 161–173 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061506

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061506

Key words

Navigation