Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of terfenadine in the treatment of common cold. A double-blind comparison with placebo

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have assessed the effects of terfenadine on rhinitis symptoms associated with the common cold in 91 patients in a double-blind placebo-controlled study. The patients received three doses of either terfenadine 60 mg (n=44) or placebo (n=47) at about 12-h intervals, starting in most patients within 48 h from the onset of symptoms. Because of deviations from the protocol, 28 cases were classified as not eligible for efficacy evaluation, but were nevertheless analysed.

Excellent/good or moderate efficacy was reported by 63% of eligible and 59% of all patients who received terfenadine (placebo 40% and 51% respectively,p=0.049 and 0.113 respectively). 68% of eligible and 52% of all patients indicated that they would take terfenadine again (placebo 23%, for bothp=0.002). Two h after tablet intake mean nasal airflow was increased by 11 l·min−1, SD 8 (placebo −1 l·min−1, SD 6,p=0.005). Symptoms were improved and rhinoscopy showed reduced swelling and redness of the mucosa and reduced nasal secretion and obstruction (basically unchanged in the placebo group).

Therefore, terfenadine seems to act favourably on the acute rhinitis symptoms associated with the common cold. Since terfenadine is devoid of anticholinergic activity, nose symptoms during the initial stage of the common cold may be mediated to an important degree by histamine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachmann W, Bachert C (1984) Die quantative Auswertung von Rhinomanometriekurven. Rhinol Otol 63: 58–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant BG, Cormier JF (1982) Cold and allergy products. In: American Pharmaceutical Association, The National Society of Pharmacists (ed) Handbook of non-prescription drugs. American Pharmaceutical Association, Washington DC, pp 123–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bye CE, Cooper J, Empey DW, Fowle ASE, Hughes DTD, Letley E, O'Grady J (1980) Effects of pseudoephedrine and triprolidine, alone and in combination, on symptoms of the common cold. Br Med J 11: 189–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard CJ, Kantner TR, Lilienfield LS, Princiotto JV, Krum RE, Crutcher JE, Belman MA, Danzig MR (1979) Effectiveness of antihistamines in the symptomatic management of the common cold. J Am Med Assoc 242: 2414–2417

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin EM, Heel RC (1985) Terfenadine. A review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 29: 34–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Drug Administration (1985) Tentative final monograph for OTC antihistamine products (1985). Federal Register 50: 2200–2218

    Google Scholar 

  • West S, Brandon B, Stolley P, Rumrill R (1975) A review of antihistamines and the common cold. Pediatrics 56 (1): 100–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henauer, S.A., Glück, U. Efficacy of terfenadine in the treatment of common cold. A double-blind comparison with placebo. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 34, 35–40 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061414

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061414

Key words

Navigation