Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding organizational culture: A Soft Systems perspective

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of organizational culture is currently undergoing a great deal of discussion in the literature which considers organizations. This paper looks at its pragmatic value in relation to organizational analysis by using Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) in combination with descriptive cultural analysis and the findings of a case study on a small retailing firm. The case study is discussed in some detail. It shows that expanding the use of SSM to include the concept of organizational culture in the initial stages of investigation can have pragmatic value in clarifying seemingly discrepant activities in the organization. This clarification led to the making of “culturally feasible” recommendations for change in the organization. The concluding section of the paper explores the relationship between hierarchy and communication by using the concept of organizational culture (explored earlier). The necessity to adopt a systems perspective when looking at organizations from such a stance is expressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allaire, J., and Firsirotu, M. E. (1984). Theories of organisational culture.Organiz. Stud. 5(3), 193–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J. M. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order.Admin. Sci. Q. 29, 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., and Luckmanur, T. (1967).The Social Construction of Reality, Penguin, Middlesex, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. (1979).Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1980). The systems movement: And some problems of researching within it. Notes on lecture given to the Open University, Dec.

  • Checkland, P. B. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B., and Davies, L. (1986). The use of the term Weltanschauung in soft systems methodology.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 13, 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked problems.Manage. Sci. Ser. B Applicat. 14(4), B-141–B-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1971).The Design of Inquiring Systems, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. (1979).The Systems Approach, Laurel, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. P. (1985).The Symbolic Construction of Community, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L. J. (1987). Systemic self-change and organisational analysis.Proceedings of 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary, June.

  • Deal, T. E., and Kennedy, A. A. (1982).Corporate Cultures;Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Addison-Wesley, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966).Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1987). Complexity: A definition by construction of a conceptual framework.Syst. Res. 4(3), 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. (1972). The theory and practice of action research in work organizations.Hum. Relat. 25, 529–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. M. (1975).Doing Field Research, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledington, P. W. J. (1987a). Understanding systemic intervention.Proceedings of 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary, June.

  • Ledington, P. W. J. (1987b).Improving Information Management: A Soft Systems Perspective, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Systems, University of Lancaster (in preparation).

  • Lewin, K. (1951).Field Theory in Social Sciences, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Feldman, M. S., Hatch, M. J., and Sitkin, S. B. (1983). The uniqueness paradox in organisational stories.Admin. Sci. Q. 28(3), 438–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors and puzzle-solving in organizational theory.Admin. Sci. Q. 25, 605–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, R. N. (1970). Three dilemmas in action research.Hum. Relat. 23(6), 499–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. (1971). Some principles for the design of an educational system for design.J. Architect. Educ. 26(1, 2), 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D., and Argyris, C. (1974).Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1964).Collected Papers, Vol. 2, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis.Admin. Sci. Q. 28(3), 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, D., and Checkland, P. B. (1976). Using a systems approach: The structure of root definitions.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 5, 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. (1975).Rethinking Symbolism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman, G. I., and Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research.Admin. Sci. Q. 23, 582–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, Sir G. (1970).Freedom in a Rocking Boat: Changing Values in an Unstable Society, Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warmington, A., Lupton, T., and Gribbin, C. (1977).Organizational Behaviour and Performance: An Open Systems Approach to Change, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947). Translated by Gerth, H. H., and Mills, C. W. (eds.),Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979).The Social Psychology of Organising, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1955).Street Corner Society, 2nd ed., Paladin, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, L.J. Understanding organizational culture: A Soft Systems perspective. Systems Practice 1, 11–30 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059886

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059886

Key words

Navigation