Skip to main content
Log in

Application of GEMSAFE to ITER CDA and Its comparison with FER

  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A safety analysis for the design of International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) in the Conceptual Design Activity stage was performed by the GEMSAFE methodology, and its results were compared with those of Fusion Experimental Reactor (FER), a Japan's facility planned next to JT-60. The objectives of this study are to confirm the applicability of GEMSAFE to ITER and to select design basis events of ITER and identify R&D items with comparison to FER. Function-Based Safety Analyses (FBSA) were carred out to select 19 and 25 design basis events for FER and ITER, respectively. The major reason for the difference is that ITER has a class-2 RI source, e.g., tritium of 7.5 × 105 Ci in mobile form, in the coolant for the first wall and blankets as well as a class-3 RI source, e.g., the immobile tritium of 2.2×107 Ci absorbed in first wall and dust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Fujii-e, Y. Kozawa, C. Namba, O. Konishi, M. Nishikawa, T. Yano, I. Yanagisawa, S. Kotake, T. Sawada, T. Mizushina, and T. Suzuki (1989). Safety analysis and evaluation methodology for fusion systems.Res Mechanica 27, 1–167.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Fujii-eet al. (1990). Development of General Methodology of Safety Analysis and Evaluation for Fusion Energy Systems (GEM-SAFE), FED12, 421–447.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Redpath (1986). Safety Guidelines for the Design of Next-Generation Tokamak Fusion Machines (NGTFM). 7th Topical Meeting on Technology of Fusion Energy, Reno, Nevada, June.

  4. H. Djerassi and J. Rouillard (1987). Fusion Reactor Blanket and First Wall Risk Analysis. IAEA-TECDOC-440, pp. 123–132.

  5. S. J. Piet (1986). Implication of probabilistic risk assessment for fusion decision making.Fusion Technol. 10, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Fujii-eet al. (1993). Application of the General Methodology of Safety Analysis and Evaluation for Fusion Energy Systems (GEMSAFE) to the FER Design, FED22, 401–413.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Shiota (1991). Master's thesis, Tokyo Inst. Tech, (in Japanese).

  8. ITER CONCEPT DEFINITION (1989). IAEA, Vienna.

  9. H. Iidaet al. (1986). Conceptual Design Study of Fusion Experimental Reactor (FER), JAERI-M86-134.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sawada, T., Saito, M. & Fujii-e, Y. Application of GEMSAFE to ITER CDA and Its comparison with FER. J Fusion Energ 12, 107–113 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059364

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059364

Key words

Navigation