Skip to main content
Log in

Conformance to Attorney Performance Standards

Advocacy behavior in a maximum security prison hospital

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

Legal representation of clients facing involuntary commitment to a maximum security hospital was investigated. Eighty-nine hearings were observed during a 5-week period immediately following implementation of Attorney Performance Standards, which define minimally adequate representation. The 10 participating attorneys reported their preparation for each case, and a summary measure of advocacy was derived. Generally, attorneys engaged in all required activities that could be accomplished in a single preparatory visit to the hospital. The level of advocacy in cases where clients faced civil commitment was compared to cases where the client faced criminal commitment. The unexpected finding that the level of advocacy for civil clients was significantly lower than that for clients facing commitment under any other legal category, was discussed in light of the degree of dangerousness presented by civil clients, the effects of deinstitutionalization, and emerging social policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albers, D. A., & Pasewark, R. A. (1974). Involuntary hospitalization: Surrender at the courthouse.American Journal of Community Psychology, 2, 287–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andalman, E., & Chambers, D. L. (1974). Effective counsel for persons facing civil commitment: A survey, a polemic, and a proposal.Mississippi Law Journal, 45, 43–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. L., & Asher, S. J. (1982). Patient rights and patient advocacy: A historical and conceptual appreciation. In B. L. Bloom & S. J. Asher (Eds.),Psychiatric patient rights and patient advocacy, (pp. 19–56). New York City: Human Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursztajn, H., Gutheil, T. G., Mill, M., Hamm, R. M., & Brodsky, A. (1986). Process analysis of judge's commitment decisions: A preliminary empirical study.American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for Public Counsel Services (1985). Attorney Performance Standards [Special Issue].Advisor, (24).

  • Cyr, J. P. (1978). The role and functions of the attorney in the civil commitment process: The District of Columbia's approach.Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 6, 107–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, R. A. (1983). Changes in the evaluation and care of male mentally disordered “offenders” in Massachusetts, 1972–1982 [Special Issue].North Carolina Journal of Mental Health, X(18), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, S. J. (1975). The role of counsel in the civil commitment process.Yale Law Journal, 84, 1540–1563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiday, V. A. (1977). The role of counsel in civil commitment: Changes, effects, determinants.Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 5, 551–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiday, V. A. (1983a). Are Lawyers the enemies of psychiatrists? A survey of civil commitment counsel and judges.American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 323–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiday, V. A. (1983b). Representing respondents under new civil commitment statutes.Law and Policy Quarterly, 5, 438–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, N. (1987). Conformance to attorney performance standards: Attorney advocacy behavior in a maximum security facility (unpublished dissertation).

  • Lockwood, R. W. (1980). How to represent a client facing civil commitment.The Practical Lawyer, 26, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memmel v. Mundy, 249 N. W. 2nd 573 (Wisc. 1977).

  • Miller, R. D., & Fiddleman, P. B. (1983). Changes in North Carolina civil commitment statutes: The impact of attorneys.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 511, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poythress, N. G. (1978). Psychiatric expertise in civil commitment: Training attorneys to cope with expert testimony.Law and Human Behavior, 2, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelovich, S. (1979). From the hospital to the prison: A step forward in deinstitutionalization?Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 30, 618–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, S. D., and Stoebe, K. J. (1975). Involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill in Iowa: The failure of the 1975 legislation.Iowa Law Review, 64, 1284–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veliz, J., & James, W. S. (1987). Medicine court: Rogers in practice.The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. A. B. (1982).The court of last resort: Mental illness and the law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, D. L., & Fletcher, C. R. (1969). The effect of legal counsel on admissions to a state mental hospital: A confrontation of professions.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 10, 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, D. B., & Scoville, S. E. (1971). The administration of psychiatric justice: Theory and practice in Arizona.Arizona Law Review, 13, 1–259.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Leavitt, N., Maykuth, P.L. Conformance to Attorney Performance Standards. Law Hum Behav 13, 217–230 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055924

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055924

Keywords

Navigation