Dicofol exposure to Florida citrus applicators: Effects of protective clothing
- 75 Downloads
Mixer-loaders and applicators of the pesticide dicofol in Florida citrus groves were monitored for exposure. Alpha-cellulose pads were placed inside and outside regular work clothing. When protective suits were in use, pads were also placed outside the suit. Dicofol accumulation rates were measured when gloves and/or facemasks were worn. Hand rinses were collected. Results showed that an ungloved, normally attired applicator reduced his total dermal exposure 38% by wearing a disposable Tyvek® protective suit, 27% by wearing gloves, and 65% by wearing both. Suits reduced total dermal exposure by 40% for mixer-loaders, but the use of gloves led to an exposure increase, probably because the inside of the gloves became contaminated.
KeywordsWaste Water Water Management Water Pollution Accumulation Rate Protective Clothing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Berkow SG (1931) Value of surface area proportions in the prognosis of cutaneous burns. Amer J Surg 11:315–317Google Scholar
- Black RF, Kurtz CP, Baum H (1971) Gas chromatographic analysis of kelthane technical. J Assoc Offic Anal Chem 54:1237–1240Google Scholar
- Brown JR (1972) The effect of dietary kelthane on mouse and rat reproduction. In: Thahori, AS (ed) Fate of pesticides in the environment. Gordon and Breach, New York, pp 531–548Google Scholar
- Morgan NL (1968) Separation of dicofol (kelthane) and its dichlorobenzophenone degradation product from a standard Florisil® column. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 3:254–257Google Scholar
- Njagi GDE, Gopalan HNB (1980) Mutagenicity testing of some selected food preservatives, herbicides, and insecticides. II. Ames Test. Bangladesh J Bot 9:141–146Google Scholar
- Toner M (1984) Banned DDT hides in legal pesticides; EPA overlooked manufacturers list of pesticides contents; Backyard gardeners, citrus industry still use DDT. The Miami Herald, Sunday, June 24, 1984Google Scholar