Skip to main content
Log in

Operator exposure from closed system loading and application of alachlor herbicide

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological monitoring (urine) and passive monitoring (patch) techniques were used to estimate total body dose in sixteen operators of closed system transfers of the emulsifiable concentrate (EC) and the micro-encapsulated (MT) formulations of alachlor herbicide from prepackaged bulk containers. Four of the operators were also monitored during the subsequent soil incorporation applications. The dermal deposition was very low and, more importantly, the analysis of 12-hour composites of urine collected for five days, revealed undetectable (<5 ppb) concentrations of alachlor metabolites in every sample from 12 of 16 operators. The mean normalized absorbed dose of alachlor was 4.1×10−7 mg/kg bw/lb applied for EC tank fill plus application, zero (undetected) for EC tank fill only, and 1.1×10−7 mg/kg bw/lb applied for MT tank fill only. These results demonstrate that operators wearing normal clothing plus protective clothing as recommended on the product label, will experience negligible exposure while using well designed closed transfer systems. The urine samples in this study were analyzed by a new method which utilizes base-pressure hydrolysis to convert the alachlor metabolites to the anilines which are separated by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and detected by an electrochemical detector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davis JE (1980) Minimizing occupational exposure to pesticides, Residue Reviews 75:34–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronenberg JM (1985a) Monsanto Final Report. Percutaneous absorption study of Lasso® MCB/C9 in rhesus monkeys, IR–84–246; 401–298. Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Accession No. 256624

  • -(1985b) Monsanto Final Report. Percutaneous absorption study of Lasso® ME in rhesus monkeys, IR-84-248; 401-299. Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Accession No. 256624

  • Lauer R, Arras DD (1981) Monsanto Final Report. Aerial and ground applicator exposure studies with Lasso® herbicide under actual field conditions, MSL-1889. Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Accession No. 70591

  • -(1982) Monsanto Final Report. Applicator exposure with Lasso® ME under field conditions, MSL-2018. Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Accession No. 70840

  • Livingston CL (1984) Monsanto Final Report. The metabolites of alachlor in monkey urine obtained from dermal penetration studies, MSL-3368. Submitted in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Accession No. 257283

  • Ting CC, Worley JW (1981) Monsanto Final Report. Permeation of Protective glove materials by Lasso® EC herbicide, MSL-1907. Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Accession No. 70593

  • World Health Organization (1982) Field surveys of exposure to pesticides — Standard Protocol.Technical Monograph Number 7, Geneva, Switzerland

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cowell, J.E., Danhaus, R.G., Kunstman, J.L. et al. Operator exposure from closed system loading and application of alachlor herbicide. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 16, 327–332 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054950

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054950

Keywords

Navigation