Skip to main content
Log in

Toxic effects of tetraethyl lead and its derivatives on the chrysophytePoterioochromonas malhamensis. VIII. Comparative studies with surfactants

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The toxic effect of triethyl lead (TriEL) on the phytoflagellatePoterioochromonas malhamensis (Chrysophyceae) was compared with those of eight surfactants some of which represent environmental pollutants. The surfactants typically inhibited algal growth and caused cytolysis in the concentration range from 12 to 310 μM. TriEL was cytolytic, similar to the surfactants, while lethal concentrations of inorganic lead did not cause cytolysis. The cationic and zwitterionic surfactants and SDS 1 and TriEL selectively inhibited mitosis and cytokinesis of the alga and caused the formation of giant multinucleated cells, suggesting selective interaction on the algal microtubules (MTs). However, DOC, TX100, and TX405 had no selective effects on these parameters. The most active surfactant, SDS, inhibited MT assemblyin vitro and caused an instant and complete disassembly if applied to MTs that were preassembled without surfactant. TX100, which was inactive in the algae, showed no effect in thein vitro MT assay, even if applied in ten times higher concentrations than SDS.

The observations indicate that the surfactants did not act chaotropically on the alga's cell membranes. It is postulated that the cytolytic effect of the surfactants (and of TriEL) was mainly governed by combined hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions with the lipid phase of the membranes, with cationic surfactants being much more effective than others. The selective action of some of the surfactants (like that of TriEL) was presumably caused by a selective interaction with protein structures. As the active surfactants were all applied in concentrations below their respective critical micelle concentrations, gross solubilization or denaturation of membrane and other proteins was most likely not involved in the observed selective effects. The results suggest that not only TriEL, but also the active surfactants (besides possible interference with cell membranes) selectively interferred with MTs and that this was the primary mechanism of their selective toxic action inP. malhamensis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson JJ, Shamoo AE (1979) Anionic detergents as divalent cation ionophores across black lipid membranes. J Membrane Biol 50:241–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangham JA, Lea EJA (1978) The interaction of detergents with bilayer lipid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 511:388–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerrum PJ (1984) Induction of anion transfer in biological membranes. In: Grandjean P (ed) Biological Effects of Organo-Lead Compounds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida p 125

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer JE, Bell LGE (1969) Reaction of detergents withAmoeba proteus. Nature 222:891–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer JE, Callaway S (1961) Further studies on the toxicity of some tetra and trialkyl lead components. Brit J Industr Med 18:277–282

    Google Scholar 

  • DiStasio JI (ed) (1981) Surfactants, Detergents and Sequestrants. Developments since 1979. Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doenges KH, Biedert S, Paweletz N (1976) Characterization of a 20S component in tubulin from mammalian brain. Biochemistry 15:2995–2999

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst R, Arditti J (1984) Biological effects of surfactants VII. Growth and development ofBrassocatleya (Orchidaceae) seedlings. New Phytol 96:197–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonenne A, Ernst R (1978) Solubilization of membrane proteins by sulfobetaines, novel zwitterionic surfactants. Anal Biochem 87:28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeffner EW, Zimmermann HP, Hoffmann CJK (1984) Influence of triethyl lead on the activity of enzymes of the ascites tumor cell plasma membrane and its microviscosity. Toxicol Lett 23:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey PL, Ernst R, Arditti J (1971) Biological effects of surfactants II. Influence on the ultrastructure of orchid seedlings. New Phytol 70:477–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Helenius A, Simons K (1975) Solubilization of membranes by detergents. Biochim Biophys Acta 415:29–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Helenius A, McCashin DR, Fries E, Tanford C (1979) Properties of detergents. In: Methods in Enzymology. Vol. LVI, Part G, Academic Press, New York, p 734

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmeland LM (1980) A nondenaturing zwitterionic detergent for membrane biochemistry: design and synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:6368–6370

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrabak A, Antoni F, Szabo MT (1982) Damaging effect of detergents on human lymphocytes. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 28:504–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Isomaa B, Mergman H, Sandberg P (1979) The binding of CTAB, a cationic surfactant, to the rat erythrocyte membrane. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 44:36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaars Sjpesterjn A, Rijkens F, Luijen JGA, Willemsen LC (1962) On the antifungal and antibacterial activity of some trisubstituted organogermanium, organotin, and organolead compounds. J Microbiol Serol 28:346–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maenz DD, Forsyth GW (1982) Ricinoleate and deoxycholate are calcium ionophores in jejunum brush border vesicles. J Membrane Biol 70:125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Makino S, Reynolds JA, Tanford C (1973) The binding of deoxycholate and Triton X-100 to proteins. J Biol Chem 248:4926–4932

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen T (1984) Atmospheric occurrence of organolead compounds. In: Grandjean P (ed) Biological Effects of Organo-Lead Compounds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, p 43

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozaki Y, Reynolds JA, Tanford C (1974) Interaction of cationic detergent with bovine serum albumin and other proteins. J Biol Chem 249:4452–4459

    Google Scholar 

  • Pethica BA, Schulman JH (1953) The physical chemistry of haemolysis by surface-active agents. Biochem 53:177–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JA, Herbert S, Polet H, Steinhardt J (1967) The binding of diverse detergent anions to bovine serum albumin. Biochemistry 6:937–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JA, Tanford C (1970) Binding of dodecyl sulfate to protein at high binding ratios. Possible implications for the state of proteins in biological membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 66:1002–1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel B, Christensen G (1979) Effect of selected water toxicants and other chemicals upon adenosine triphosphatase activity. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 23:365–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin RJ (1965)In vitro inhibition of Na+-Na+ and Mg2+ ATPases by mono-, di-, and trivalent cations. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 120:802–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Röderer G (1980) On the toxic effects of tetraethyl lead and its derivatives on the chrysophytePoterioochromonas malhamensis. I. Tetraethyl lead. Environ Res 23:371–384

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1981) On the toxic effects of tetraethyl lead and its derivatives on the chrysophytePoterioochromonas malhamensis. II. Triethyl lead, diethyl lead, and inorganic lead. Environ Res 25:361–371

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1982a) On the toxic effects of tetraethyl lead and its derivatives on the chrysophytePoterioochromonas malhamensis. III. Chemical analyses. J Environ Sci Health A17:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1982b) Biological effects of inorganic and organic compounds of mercury, lead, tin, and arsenic. In: Hemphill DD (ed) Trace Substances in Environmental Health—XVI. University of Missouri, Columbia, p 137

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1984a) Selective interaction of triethyl lead with microtubules from mammalian and nonmammalian cells. In: Hemphill DD (ed) Trace Substances in Environmental Health—XVIII. University of Missouri, Columbia, p 514

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1984b) Toxic effects in plant organisms. In: Grandjean P (ed) Biological Effects of Organo-Lead Compounds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, p 63

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1986a) On the toxic effects of tetraethyl lead and its derivatives on the chrysophytePoterioochromonas malhamensis. VI. Effects on lorica formation, mitosis and cytokinesis. Environ Res 39:205–231

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1986b) On the toxic effects of tetraethyl lead and its derivatives on the chrysophytePoterioochromonas malhamensis. VII. Protective action of thiol compounds, vitamins, trace elements, and other agents. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 11:277–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Röderer G, Doenges KH (1983) Influence of trimethyl lead and inorganic lead on thein vitro assembly of microtubules from mammalian brain. Neurotoxicity 4:171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnepf E, Deichgräber G, Röderer G, Herth W (1977) The flagellar root apparatus, the microtubular system and associated organelles in the chrysophycean flagellate,Poterioochromonas malhamensis Peterfi (syn.Poteriochromonas stipitata Scherffel andOchromonas malhamensis Pringsheim). Protoplasma 92:87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steck TL, Fox CF (1972) Membrane proteins. In: Fox CF, Keith Ad (eds) Membrane Molecular Biology. Sinauer Associates Inc, Stanford, Connecticut, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  • White GF, Russell NJ, Day MJ (1985) A survey of sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) resistance and alkylsulphatase production in bacteria from clean and polluted river sites. Environ Pollut Ser A 37:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HP, Doenges KH, Röderer G (1985) Interaction of triethyl lead chloride with microtubulesin vitro and in mammalian cells. Exp Cell Res 156:140–152.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Röderer, G. Toxic effects of tetraethyl lead and its derivatives on the chrysophytePoterioochromonas malhamensis. VIII. Comparative studies with surfactants. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 16, 291–301 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054946

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054946

Keywords

Navigation