Skip to main content
Log in

Solubility and agronomic effectiveness of partially acidulated phosphate rocks as influenced by their iron and aluminium oxide content

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Partially acidulated phosphate rock (PAPR) has been shown to be an effective source of P for plants grown on acid soils. Less information in available, however, regarding the effect of the phosphate rock (PR) source on the solubility and agronomic effectiveness of PAPR.

The effect of Fe2O3 + Al2O3 content in PR on the quality of PAPR produced was investigated in this study. Nine sources of PR from Africa, Latin America, and the United States, representing a range of Fe2O3 + Al2O3 from 0.7% to 12.4%, were used. In a single-step process, the finely ground PRs were partially acidulated with H2SO4 at the 30% or 50% acidulation level and granulated (−3.35 + 1.18 mm or −6 + 14 mesh). It was found that the water-soluble P content in PAPR decreased with increasing Fe2O3 + Al2O content in the PR used. Apparently, the presence of Fe2O3 + Al2O3 resulted in a reversion of some of the water-soluble P to citrate-soluble P and sometimes even to citrate-insoluble P.

A short-term (6 weeks) greenhouse study was conducted to evaluate crop response to PAPRs and single superphosphate (SSP); maize, the test crop, was grown on an acid soil (pH 4.5)—Hartsells silt loam (Typic Hapludults). The agronomic effectiveness of PAPRs with respect to SSP (in terms of dry-matter yield of maize) decreased with increasing Fe2O3 + Al2O3 content in PRs. Phosphorus uptake by maize from PAPRs was found to correlate well with water solubility but not with citrate solubility. The results obtained in this study show that the detrimental effect of Fe2O3 + Al2O3 content on the solubility and P availability of PAPR should be considered when selecting a PR for PAPR production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hammond LL, Chien SH and Polo JR (1980) Phosphorus availability from partial acidulation of two phosphate rocks. Fert Res 1: 37–49

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hammond LL, Chien SH and Mokwunye AU (1986) Agronomic value of unacidulated and partially acidulated phosphate rocks indigenous to the tropics. Adv Agron 40: 89–140

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huffmann EO (1968) Behavior of fertilizer phosphates. Int Congr Soil Sci, Trans 9th (Adelaide, Australia), II, 745–754

    Google Scholar 

  4. McLean EO and Wheeler RW (1964) Partially acidulated rock phosphates as a source of phosphorus to plants. I. Growth chamber studies. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 28: 545–550

    Google Scholar 

  5. McLean EO and Logan TJ (1970) Source of phosphorus for plants grown in soils with different phosphorus fixation tendencies. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 34: 907–911

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shultz JJ (1986) Sulfuric acid-based acidulated phosphate rock: Its production, cost, and use. Tech Bull IFDC-T-31. Muscle Shoals, Alabama: International Fertilizer Development Center

    Google Scholar 

  7. Terman GL and Allen SE (1967) Response of corn to phosphorus in underacidulated phosphate rock and rocksuperphosphates fertilizers. J Agric Food Chem 15: 354–358

    Google Scholar 

  8. Watanabe FA and Olsen SR (1965) Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from the soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 29: 677–678

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammond, L.L., Chien, S.H., Roy, A.H. et al. Solubility and agronomic effectiveness of partially acidulated phosphate rocks as influenced by their iron and aluminium oxide content. Fertilizer Research 19, 93–98 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054680

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054680

Key words

Navigation