Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction between neurofilaments and mitochondria in cultured cells of the rat hippocampus

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Interaction between neurofilaments and mitochondria was studied on the model of cultured hippocampal cells of newborn rats. A treatment by specific toxins ββ′-iminodipropionitril or hexanedione resulted in a disintegration and translocation of neurofilaments in the cultured neurons. These effects were accompanied by a considerable decrease in dimensions of mitochondria, an increase in their elongation coefficient, a noticeable increase in spatial density of these organelles, and their translocation within the perinuclear layer of cytoplasm. The role of neurofilaments in the intraneuronal distribution of mitochondria and modifications of their functional state is discussed. The neurofilament system is supposed to considerably influence the processes of division, growth, and translocation of the mitochondria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Langui, B. H. Anderton, J. P. Brion, and J. Ulrich, “Effects of aluminium chloride on cultured cells from rat brain hemispheres,”Brain Res.,438, No. 1/2, 67–76 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. C. Vickersand and M. Costa, “Neurofilament protein triplet immunoreactivity in the dorsal root ganglia of the guinea-pig,”Cell Tissue Res.,265, 159–167 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. N. Lawson, E. I. Harper, A. A. Harper, et al., “A monoclonal antibody against neurofilament protein specifically labels a subpopulation of rat sensory neurones,”J. Comp. Neurol.,228, 263–272 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. J. Pleasure, M. E. Selzer, and V. M.-Y. Lee, “Lamprey neurofilaments combine in one subunit the feature of each mammalian NF triplet protein, but are highly phosphorylated only in large axons,”J. Neurosci.,9, No. 2, 698–709 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. F. Watson, J. W. Griffin, K. P. Fittro, and P. N. Hoffman, “Phosphorylation-dependent immunoreactivity of neurofilaments increases during axonal maturation and ββ′-iminodipropionitril intoxication,”J. Neurochem.,53, No. 6, 1818–1829 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.-F. Leterrier, J. Eyer, D. G. Weiss, and M. Lenden, “In vitro studies of the physical interactions between neurofilaments, microtubules, and mitochondria isolated from the central nervous system,” in:Conference Proceedings ‘The living cell in four dimensions,’ G. Paillotin (ed.) (1991), pp. 91–105.

  7. M. J. Carden, J. A. Trojanowski, W. W. Schlaepfer, and V. M.-Y. Lee, “Two-stage expression of neurofilament polypeptides during rat neurogenesis with early establishment of adult phosphorylation patterns,”J. Neurosci. (1987).

  8. W. W. Schlaepfer, “Neurofilament structure, metabolism, and implications in disease,”J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.,46, 117–129 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Moretto, S. Monaco, M. G. Passarin, et al., “Cytoskeletal changes induced by 2,5-hexanedione on developing human neuronsin vitro,”Arch. Toxicol.,65, No. 5, 409–413 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. W. Griffin, I. Parhad, B. Gold, et al., “Axonal transport of neurofilament protein in IDPN neurotoxicity,”Neurotoxicology,6, 43–54 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. G. Skibo, L. M. Koval, and H. D. Lutsik, “Lectins as a tool for study of developing neurons,”Lectins Biol. Clin. Biochem., No. 7, 339–343 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. A. Rusakov, G. G. Skibo, and D. A. Vasilenko, “The spatial pattern of the synaptic vesicular apparatus as a correlate of transmitter storage models,”Neurosci. Lett.,131, 156–158 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. A. Rusakov, O. L. Berezovskaya, and G. G. Skibo, “Cytoskeletal-mediated age-dependent lateral topography of lectin-gold labelled molecules on the plasma membrane of cultured neurons,”Statist. View,52, 369–379 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. A. Rusakov, “Estimation of the size distribution of closed cell elements from analysis of their random plane sections,”Biometrics,49, Mar., 141–149 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. N. Hoffman, “Changes in neurofilament transport coincide temporally with alterations in the caliber of axons in regenerating motor fibers,”J. Cell. Biol.,101, 1332–1340 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. S. Raine, B. Ghetti, and M. L. Shelanski, “On the association between microtubules and mitochondria within axons,”Brain Res.,34, 389–393 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. D. Cooper and R. S. Smith, “The movement of optically detectable organelles in myelinated axons ofXenopus laevis,”J. Physiol.,242, No. 1, 77–97 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Martz, R. J. Lasek, S. T. Brady, and R. D. Allen, “Mitochondrial motility in axons: membranous organelles may interact with the force generating system through multiple surface binding sites,”Cell Motil.,4, 89–101 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Hirokawa, “Cross-linker system between neurofilaments, microtubules, and membranous organelles in frog axons revealed by quick-freeze, deep etching method,”J. Cell Biol.,94, 129–142 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Miller, M. Haugh, and B. Anderson, “The cytoskeleton and neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's desease,”Trends Neurosci.,9, No. 2, 76–80 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. M. Paschal, H. S. Shpetner, and R. B. Vallee, “MAP 1C is a microtubule-activated ATPase which translocates microtubulesin vitro and has dynein-like properties,”J. Cell Biol.,105, No. 3, 1273–1282 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. H. Ball and S. J. Singer, “Mitochondria are associated with microtubules and not with intermediate filaments in cultured fibroblasts,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,79, 123–126 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. H. Heggeness, M. Simon, and S. Singer, “Association of mitochondria with microtubules in cultured cells,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,75, No. 8, 3863–3866 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. E. Smith, “The localization of neurofilaments and microtubules during the postnatal development of Clark's nucleus in the kitten,”Brain Res.,53, No. 1, 41–53 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. Linden, B. D. Nelson, and J.-F. Leterrier, “Studies on the interaction between mitochondria and the cytoskeleton,”J. Bioenerg. Biomembranes,21, No. 4, 507–518 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Carmo-Fonseca and J. F. David-Ferreira, “Interactions of intermediate filaments with cell structures,”Electron Microsc. Res.,3, 115–141 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Traub,Intermediate Filaments, a Review, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. S. Eckert, “Alteration of the distribution of intermediate filaments in PtK1 cells by acrylamide II. Effect on the organization of cytoplasmic organelles,”Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton,6, 15–24 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  29. I. C. Summerhayes, D. Wong, and L. B. Chen, “Effects of microtubules and intermediate filaments on mitochondrial distribution,”J. Cell Sci.,61, 87–105 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.-F. Leterrier, D. A. Rusakov, B. D. Nelson, and M. L. Linden, “Interactions between brain mitochondria and cytoskeleton. Evidence for specialized domains involved in the association of cytoskeleton-associated proteins to mitochondriain situ andin vitro,”J. Microsc. Res. Tech. (1994).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 3–10, January–February, 1995.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berezovskaya, O.L., Rusakov, D.A., Skibo, G.G. et al. Interaction between neurofilaments and mitochondria in cultured cells of the rat hippocampus. Neurophysiology 27, 1–7 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054559

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054559

Keywords

Navigation