Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of modified forms of urea and nitrogen levels on weed growth and grain yield of lowland rice

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The growth of weeds and their subsequent reduction of rice yield as affected by N source neem cake coated urea (NCU), dicyandiamide coated urea (DCU), rock phosphate coated urea (RPCU), urea supergranules (USG) and prilled urea (PU) was studied on a clay loam soil at Coimbatore, India. Experiments were conducted in northeast monsoon (NEM) 1981, summer 1982, and southwest monsoon (SWM) 1982 seasons.

The crop was associated with eleven weed species, and the dominant weeds wereEchinochloa crus-galli, Cyperus difformis andMarsilea quadrifolia. The weed flora varied between seasons. Deep placement of USG reduced the dry weight of weeds in NEM and summer seasons at 60, 90 and 120 Kg N ha−1 whereas it increased the dry weight at 60 and 90 but not 120 Kg N ha−1 in SWM season. The dry weight of weeds decreased with increased N rates for all N sources during NEM and summer seasons. In SWM season, dry weight of weeds increased with increased N rates for all N sources except USG. The grain yield of rice was drastically reduced with the deep placement of USG at 60 but not 120 Kg N ha−1 in SWM season. The differential effect of the N sources between seasons was due to the change of the weed flora. Dominance ofE. crus-galli during SWM season had greater influence on weed dry weight and grain yield of rice.

Nitrogen uptake by weeds was frequently greater in unfertilized plots, particularly in NEM and summer seasons. In SWM season, the apparent fertilizer N recovery by weeds was high for USG. It decreased from 53% for 60 Kg USG-N ha−1 to 4% for 120 Kg USG-N ha−1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alkamper J (1976) Influence of weed infestation on effect of fertilizer dressings. Pflanzenschutz Nachr Bayer 29: 191–235

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cao ZH, De Datta SK and Fillery IRP (1984) Nitrogen-15 balance and residual effects of urea-N in wetland rice fields as affected by deep placement techniques. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48: 203–208

    Google Scholar 

  3. Craswell ET and Vlek PLG (1979) Fate of fertilizer nitrogen applied to wetland rice. In Nitrogen and rice, pp 175–192, IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Datta SK (1987) Advances in soil fertility research and nitrogen fertilizer management for lowland rice. In Efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers for rice, pp 27–42, IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Datta SK, Magnaye CP and Moomaw JC (1968) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen (15N-labelled) for flooded rice. Trans 9th Int Soil Sci Congr Adelaide Australia IV, 67–76

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holm L (1969) Weed problems in developing countries. Weed Sci 17: 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iruthayaraj MR (1981) Study on the effect of water management practices and nitrogen levels on weed growth in two swamp rice varieties. Agrl Sci Digest 1(1): 39–42

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kakati NN and Mani VS (1977) Chemical weed control in rice in relation to fertiliser use. Proc Weed Sci Conf pp 170–171, Hyderabad, India

  9. Mitsui S (1954) Inorganic nutrition, fertilisation and soil amelioration for lowland rice. Tokyo, Yokendo Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mohamed Ali A, Sankaran N and Sankaran S (1977) Relative efficiency and methods of application of herbicides in transplanted rice. Proc ISWS/APAU Weed Sci Conf, pp 165–168, Hyderabad, India

  11. Pillai KG and De R (1979) Mineral nitrogen of soil, leaf nitrogen content and grain yield of rice, variety Jaya as affected by water and nitrogen fertiliser management. Field crop Res 2: 125–129

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rambabu P, Pillai KG and Narasa Reddy S (1983) Effect of modified urea materials and their methods of application dry matter production, grain yield and nitrogen uptake in rice. Oryza 20 (2 & 3): 86–90

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ray BR (1973) Weed control in rice. Indian J Weed Sci 5 (1): 60–72

    Google Scholar 

  14. Savant NK, De Datta SK and Craswell ET (1982) Distribution patterns of ammonium nitrogen and15N uptake by rice after deep placement of urea supergranules in wetland soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46: 567–573

    Google Scholar 

  15. Varamisra V (1976) The growth and cultural control of weeds in rice M Agric, Univeristy of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 175 p

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH and Gomez KA (1976) Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines, 83 p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution from the part of Ph.D. work of the first author at Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venkitaswamy, R., Subramanian, S. & Veerabadran, V. Influence of modified forms of urea and nitrogen levels on weed growth and grain yield of lowland rice. Fertilizer Research 28, 315–321 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054332

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054332

Key words

Navigation