Skip to main content
Log in

The (non) equivalence theorem when there are matching grants as well as lump sum grants

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In developing their influential equivalence theorem Bradford and Oates (1971) implicitly assume that there is a lump sum grant only. This paper explores whether the equivalence result continues to hold when the lump sum grant is part of a program of grants-in-aid which includes a matching grant. It is shown that the equivalence results as stated by Bradford and Oates does not hold in these more general circumstances; however, a much weaker equivalence result does hold. This finding is important because there has been a tendency in the empirical literature to assume that the equivalence result holds under quite general circumstances. It is also shown here that the combined use of lump sum and matching grants can produce a reverse flypaper effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, R.R., Levaggi, R. and Smith, P. (1991). Does the flypaper model stick? A test of the relative performance of the flypaper and conventional models of local government budgetary behaviour.Public Choice 69: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, D.F. and Oates, W.E. (1971). The analysis of revenue in a new approach to fiscal decisions.Quarterly Journal of Economics 35: 416–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, N.S. (1983). The effect of income taxation on the labor supply of married men in Sweden.Journal of Public Economics 22: 169–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant, D.F., Gramlich, E.M. and Rubinfeld, D.L. (1979). The stimulative effects of intergovernmental grants: Or why money sticks where it hits. In P.M. Mieszkowski and W.M. Oakland (Eds.),Fiscal federalism and grants-in-aid, 5–21. The Urban Institute, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramlich, E.M. (1977). Intergovernmental grants: A review of the empirical literature. In W.E. Oates (Ed.),The political economy of fiscal federalism, 219–239, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B.W. (1983). The flypaper effect and other anomalies.Journal of Public Economics 22: 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.M. (1982).The political economy of bureaucracy. Oxford: Philip Allan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W.E. (1979). Lump sum intergovernmental grants have price effects. In P.M. Mieszkowski and W.M. Oakland (Eds.),Fiscal federalism and grants-in-aid, 23–30. The Urban Institute: Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1980). An institutional theory of the effect of intergovernmental grants.National Tax Journal 33: 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, D.E. (1989). Demand estimation for public goods: Distortionary taxes and other sources of bias.Regional Science and Urban Economics 19: 353–379.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was completed whilst the author was a visiting member of the Faculty at Queen's University, Ontario.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnett, R.R. The (non) equivalence theorem when there are matching grants as well as lump sum grants. Public Choice 75, 363–369 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053445

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053445

Keywords

Navigation