Skip to main content
Log in

Selective involvement of non-histone chromatin proteins in the reproduction of averse reaction to food in snail

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Participation of the brain-specific non-histone chromatin proteins Np-3.5 in the reproduction of an averse habit to certain kind of food was studied in experiments onHelix lucorum. Antibodies to these proteins were found to completely suppress the behavioral reactions and responses of the defensive behavior command neurons evoked by a presentation of a certain conditioning stimulus: a carrot. The action of the antibodies was specific, as they did not change the snail's reactions to presentation of another conditioning stimulus: an apple. The effect developed 1.5 h after the administration of antibodies to Np-3.5, and remained for 80–110 min, with subsequent complete restoration of the conditioned reflex. The antibodies to Np-3.5 did not affect the nutritive behavior of untrained snails. The antibodies to Np-3.5 were found to label cytoplasm in the command neurons, whereas in the snails trained to reject carrot the label appeared in the nuclei of the cells. It has been suggested that the Np-3.5 proteins selectively participate in the molecular-genetic processes responsible for neurophysiological mechanisms of an information draw from the long-term memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. P. Ashmarin and S. A. Titov, “The modern concepts on the mechanisms of neurological memory,”Biol. Nauki, No. 3, 30–42 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. H. Byrne, “Cellular analysis of associative learning,”Physiol. Rev. 67, No. 2, 329–439 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. D. Hawkins, E. R. Kandel, and S. A. Siegelbaum, “Learning to modulate transmitter release: themes and variations in synaptic plastlcity,”Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 625–665 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. P. Davis and L. R. Squire, “Protein synthesis and memory,”Psychol. Bull. 96, No. 3, 518–558 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Alberts, D. Bray, J. Lewis, et al.,Molecular Biology of Cell [Russian translations], Vol. 2, Mir, Moscow (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. G. Sutcliffe, “mRNA in the mammalian central nervous system,”Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 157–198 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. A. Karavanov and B. N. Afanas'ev, “Non-histone chromatin proteins,”Mol. Biol. 17, No. 2, 231–233 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. J. Halikowski and C. C. Liew, “Structure and function of non-histone phosphoproteins,”Biochem. Cell. Biol. 66, No. 5. 349–366 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. A. Mekhtiev, M. A. Gruden', and A. B. Poletaev, “Detection and extraction of glycoproteins and nuclear proteins in bull brain,”Biologiya 49, No. 12, 1959–1964 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. O. A. Maksimova and P. M. Balaban,Neuronal Mechanisms of Behavior Plasticity [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. B. Logunov, “Correlation of fast and slow simple synaptic potentials in command neurons ofHelix pomatia,”Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. 33, No. 2, 355–362 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. P. Nikitin, S. A. Kozyrev, and M. O. Samoilov, “Neurophysiological changes and dynamics of bound calcium during the development of associative learning inHelix lucorum,”Neirofiziologiya 24, No. 6, 691–701 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. N. Sokolov, “Endoneuronal mechanisms of the reinforcement,”Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat. 37, No. 3, 403–407 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Polet, “Effects of fibroblastic growth factor on protein degradation of non-histone protein to the nucleus and DNA synthesis in diploid fibroblasts,”Exp. Cell Res. 169, No. 1, 178–190 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Makoto, N. S. Imamoto, and T. Uchida, “Monoclonal antibody against non-histone chromosomal protein high mobility group 1 co-migrates with high mobility group 1 into nucleus,”J. Biol. Chem. 261, No. 2, 1829–1834 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. P. Nikitin and S. A. Kozyrev, “Learning-related long-term synaptic facilitation in snails: possible mechanisms of long-term memory formation,”Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology 1, No. 5, 383–398 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kozyrev, S.A., Nikitin, V.P., Goncharuk, V.D. et al. Selective involvement of non-histone chromatin proteins in the reproduction of averse reaction to food in snail. Neurophysiology 27, 132–141 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053167

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053167

Keywords

Navigation