Skip to main content
Log in

Fate of nitrogen fertilizer applied to lowland rice on a Sulfic Tropaquept

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on an acid sulfate soil in Thailand to determine the effect of N fertilization practices on the fate of fertilizer-N and yield of lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.). A delayed broadcast application of ammonium phosphate sulfate (16-20-0) or urea was compared with basal incorporation of urea, deep placement of urea as urea supergranules (USG), and amendment of urea with a urease inhibitor. Deep placement of urea as USG significantly reduced floodwater urea- and ammoniacal-N concentrations following N application but did not reduce N loss, as determined from an15N balance, in this experiment where runoff loss was prevented. The urease inhibitor, phenyl phosphorodiamidate (PPD), had little effect on floodwater urea- and ammoniacal-N, and it did not reduce N loss. The floodwater pH never exceeded 4.5 in the 7 days following the first N applications, and application of 16-20-0 reduced floodwater pH by 0.1 to 0.3 units below the no-N control. The low floodwater pH indicated that ammonia volatilization was unimportant for all the N fertilization practices. Floodwater ammoniacal-N concentrations following application of urea or 16-20-0 were greater on this Sulfic Tropaquept than on an Andaqueptic Haplaquoll with near neutral pH and alkaline floodwater. The prolonged, high floodwater N concentrations on this Sulfic Tropaquept suggested that runoff loss of applied N might be a potentially serious problem when heavy rainfall or poor water control follow N fertilization. The unaccounted-for15N in the15N balances, which presumably represented gaseous N losses, ranged from 20 to 26% of the applied N and was unaffected by urea fertilization practice. Grain yield and N uptake were significantly increased with applied N, but grain yield was not significantly affected by urea fertilization practice. Yield was significantly lower (P = 0.05) for 16-20-0 than for urea; however, this difference in yield might be due to later application of P and hence delayed availability of P in the 16-20-0 treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allison FE (1963) Losses of gaseous nitrogen from soils by chemical mechanisms involving nitrous acid and nitrites. Soil Sci 96: 404–409

    Google Scholar 

  2. Austin ER, Bradford TJ and Lupin MS (1984) High-performance liquid chromatographic determination and hydrolysis studies of phenyl phosphorodiamidate, a urease inhibitor. J Agricultural Food Chemistry 32: 1090–1095

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buresh RJ (1987) Relative susceptibility of conventional and experimental nitrogen sources to ammonia loss from flooded rice fields. Fert Res 13: 139–153

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buresh RJ, Austin ER and Craswell ET (1982) Analytical methods in15N research. Fert Res 3: 37–62

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buresh RJ, De Datta SK, Padilla JL and Samson MI (1988) Effect of two urease inhibitors on floodwater ammonia following urea application to lowland rice. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52 (In press)

  6. Cao ZH, De Datta SK and Fillery IRP (1983) Effect of placement methods on floodwater properties and recovery of applied N (15N-labeled urea) in wetland rice. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48: 196–203

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chairoj P, Uehara Y, Kimura M, Wada H and Takai Y (1984) Nitrogen dynamics in the uppermost part of submerged paddy soils in temeprate and tropical regions. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 30: 383–396

    Google Scholar 

  8. Craswell ET, De Datta SK, Obcemea WN and Hartantyo M (1981) Time and mode of nitrogen fertilizer application to tropical wetland rice. Fert Res 2: 247–259

    Google Scholar 

  9. Da Silva PRF and Stutte CA (1981) Nitrogen loss in conjunction with transpiration from rice leaves as influenced by growth stage, leaf position, and N supply. Agron J 73: 38–42

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Datta SK, Obcemea WN, Chen RY, Calabio JC and Evangelista RC (1987) Effect of water depth on nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen-15 balance in lowland rice. Agron J 79: 210–216

    Google Scholar 

  11. Douglas LA and Bremner JM (1970) Extraction and colorimetric determination of urea in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 34: 859–862

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fillery IRP, Simpson JR and De Datta SK (1984) Influence of field environment and fertilizer management on ammonia loss from flooded rice. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48: 914–920

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fillery IRP and De Datta SK (1986) Ammonia volatilization from nitrogen sources applied to rice fields: I. Methodology, ammonia fluxes, and nitrogen-15 loss. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50: 80–86

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freney JR, Simpson JR and Denmead OT (1983) Volatilization of ammonia. In: Freney JR and Simpson JR (eds.) Gaseous loss of nitrogen from plant-soil systems, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  15. IAEA (1978) Isotope studies on rice fertilization. IAEA Technical Report Series 181, Vienna

  16. IFDC (1985) Asia fertilizer situation. International Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle Shoals, AL

    Google Scholar 

  17. IRRI (1982) Annual report for 1981. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kanareugsa C, Mamaril CP and De Datta SK (1987) Country report: Thailand. In: Efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers for rice. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, pp 253–257

    Google Scholar 

  19. Katyal JC, Singh Bijay, Vlek PLG and Craswell ET (1985) Fate and efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers applied to wetland rice. II. Punjab, India. Fert Res 6: 279–290

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moller Nielsen J, Mural NS, Bauphan C, Poovarodom S, Lawongsa P and Alva AK (1986) Fertilization of tropical rice: a case study on Bangkok plain. Fert Res 10: 97–112

    Google Scholar 

  21. Neue HU, Scharpenseel HW and Martin U (1983) Kurzmitteilung ammoniak-abgabe durch blatter von reispflanzen. Z Pflanzenernaehr Bodenk 146: 398–400

    Google Scholar 

  22. Phongpan S (1985) Volatilization losses of ammonia from flooded soils: I. Effects of nitrogen source, method of placement and soil type. Thai J Agric Sci 18: 109–122

    Google Scholar 

  23. Singh BK, Tan PS, Thanh LV and Luat NV (1987) Phosphorus application to acid-sulfate soil. International Rice Research Newsletter 12 (3): 51–52

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sorasith V and Takai Y (1983) Paddy nitrogen economy: Comparative ecological study on nitrogen economy of paddy soil between tropical and temperate regions. NODAI Research Institute, Tokyo University of Agriculture

  25. Van Breemen N (1976) Genesis and solution chemistry of acid sulfate soils in Thailand. Agric Res Rep (Versl Landbouwkd Onderz) 848, PUDOC, Wageningen, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van Breemen N and Pons LJ (1978) Acid sulfate soils and rice. In: Soils and rice. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, p 739–761

    Google Scholar 

  27. Verdouw H, van Echteld CJA and Dekkers EMJ (1978) Ammonia determination based on indophenol formation with sodium salicylate. Water Research 12: 399–402

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vlek PLG and Byrnes BH (1986) The efficacy and loss of fertilizer N in lowland rice. Fert Res 9: 131–147

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wetselaar R and Farquhar GD (1980) Nitrogen losses from tops of plants. Adv Agron 33: 263–302

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snitwongse, P., Satrusajang, A. & Buresh, R.J. Fate of nitrogen fertilizer applied to lowland rice on a Sulfic Tropaquept. Fertilizer Research 16, 227–240 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01051373

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01051373

Key words

Navigation