Skip to main content
Log in

Nitrogen response of maize under temporary flooding

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The adverse effect of temporary flooding on maize (Zea mays L.) yields and the nitrogen management required to mitigate the effect of flooding were studied for five years in field experiments on Choa sandy loam soil.

Maize yields decreased with increase in duration of flooding and with decrease in the age of the crop at the time of flooding. Flooding periods exceeding 48 hours caused significant crop damage. The loss in yield on account of flooding was, however, less in 40-day old crops. A 24 hours flooding decreased grain yield by 17.7 and 3.9 per cent in 20-day and 40-day old crops respectively. Maximum yield loss amounted to 1.23 t ha−1 of grains with 72 hours of flooding of 20-day old crop indicating that a younger crop is more prone to the deleterious effect of flooding.

The nitrogen content of grains decreased significantly with increase in flooding period. A supplemental dose of 7 kg N ha−1 as urea spray significantly increased grain yield. Soil application of supplemental nitrogen at the rate of 14 or 20 kg N ha−1 enhanced the maize yield by 0.7 to 0.9 t ha−1 under temporary flooded conditions. Spraying with urea solution increased nitrogen removed by the crop.

Successive increments of 60 kg N ha−1 gave an additional yields of 1.23, 1.01 and 0.41 t ha−1 over the crop that received no nitrogen. Flooded maize responded to even higher rates of N fertilization than the dose of 120 kg N ha−1 which is recommended in this region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bremner JM (1965) Inorganic forms of nitrogen. In methods of Soil Analysis, part II (Eds. Black CA et al.) Amer Soc Agron Inc., Wisconsin, USA p. 1179–1237

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chaudhry TN, Bhatnagar VK and Prihar SS (1975) Corn yield and nutrient uptake as affected by Water-Table depth and soil submergence. Agron J 67, 745–749

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joshi, MS and Dastane NG (1965) Studies on excess water tolerance of crop plants. Indian J Agron 10, 289–298

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khera KL and Singh NT (1975) Fertilizer-aeration interaction in maize (Zea mays L.) under temporary flooding. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 23, 336–343

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lal R and Taylor GS (1969) Drainge and nutrient effects in a field lysimeter study:I Corn yields and soil conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 33, 937–941

    Google Scholar 

  6. Letey J and Stolzy LH (1964) Measurement of oxygen diffusion rates with platinum electrode I. Theory and equipment. Hilgardia 35, 545–554

    Google Scholar 

  7. Purvis AC and Williamson RE (1972) Effects of flooding and gaseous composition of the root environment on growth of corn. Agron J 64, 674–678

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schwab GO, Taylor GS, Fouse JF and Stibbe E (1966) Crop response from tile and surface drainage. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 30, 634–637

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shalhevet J and Zwerman PJ (1962) Nitrogen response of corn under variable conditions of drainage — A lysimeter study. Soil Sci 93, 172–182

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stolzy LH and Letey J (1964) Measurement of oxygen diffusion rate with platinum electrode. Correlation of plant responses to soil oxygen diffusion rates. Hilgardia 35, 567–576

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, N., Vig, A. & Singh, R. Nitrogen response of maize under temporary flooding. Fertilizer Research 6, 111–120 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01051005

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01051005

Key words

Navigation