Abstract
A study is made of the intensity of a hydroshock in a two-phase gas-liquid mixture in a slug flow regime in the case when a pipeline is shut off by a liquid slug. The intensity is studied as a function of the length of the shut-off section of the liquid slug, the content of gas bubbles in the liquid slugs, and the pipeline shut-off law, and with allowance for the shock-wave character of the process [1, 2]. The calculated data using the shock-wave theory agree well with the experimental data of [3] and, unlike the results of the linear theory of [3], make it possible to determine the intensity of the hydroshock not only in the case of weak waves, but also in the case of waves of moderate intensity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
B. E. Gel'fand and E. I. Timofeev, “Investigation of hydroshock in hydrodynamic shock tubes,” Teplofiz. Vys. Temp.,21, 330 (1983).
A. D. Kovalev and G. P. Shindyapin, “Hydroshock theory in a two-phase gas-liquid mixture,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza, No. 5, 202 (1984).
K. Akagawa, T. Fujii, Y. Ito, T. Yamaguchi, and K. Fukuhara, “Studies on shock phenomena in two-phase flow,” Bull. JSME,25, 387 (1982).
N. V. Filin, G. G. Katsnel'son, V. N. Zakharov, and Ya. L. Iovnovich, “Features of regulating the performance dynamics of the shut-off equipment of a drive mechanism,” Khim. Neft. Mashinostr., No. 4, 12 (1981).
I. J. Campbell and A. S. Pitcher, “Shock waves in a liquid containing gas bubbles,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A,243, 534 (1953).
Ya. L. Iovnovich, V. N. Zakharov, G. G. Katsnel'son, and N. V. Filin, “Simulation of unsteady flows interacting with a drive mechanism,” Energ. Transport, No. 6, 151 (1980).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Translated from Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Mekhanika Zhidkosti i Gaza, No. 5, pp. 188–190, September–October, 1985.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kovalev, A.D., Shindyapin, G.P. Hydroshock theory in a two-phase gas-liquid mixture in a slug flow regime. Fluid Dyn 20, 831–833 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01050104
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01050104