Skip to main content
Log in

Shirking and political support in the U.S. Senate, 1964–1984

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several empirical studies have suggested that legislators engage in a surprisingly large degree of on-the-job consumption, or ideological behavior. These findings cast doubt on the hypothesis that legislators can be modelled as though they seek to maximize political support. This paper attempts to determine whether commonly used proxies for ideology in fact represent behavior to which voters are averse. The results show that legislators who engage in more of this behavior lose general-election support without generally receiving compensating increases in partyprimary support. A corollary to this result is that voters punish shirking legislators significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACA Index, 1963–1984. Washington: Americans for Constitutional Action.

  • The American Jewish yearbook, 1965, 1971, 1981. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America.

  • Barone, M. and Ujifusa, G. (1981, 1983, 1985).The almanac of American politics. Washington: National Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M., Ujifusa, G. and Matthews, D. (1972, 1973).The almanac of American politics. Boston: Gambit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M., Ujifusa, G. and Mathews, D. (1975, 1977, 1979).The almanac of American politics. New York: E.P. Dutton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B. (1991). The influence of ideology on congressional voting.Economic Inquiry 19: 416–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, J. (1983). The influence of constituency diversity on electoral competition in voting for congress, 1974–1978.Legislative Studies Quarterly 8: 201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, J., Covington, C and Fleisher, R. (1985). Explaining challenger quality in congressional elections.Journal of Politics 47: 510–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. and Oppenheimer, J. (1984). A method of estimating the personal ideology of political representatives.American Political Science Review 78: 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Quarterly almanac. (1965–1988). Washington: Congressional Quarterly.

  • Crain, W. M. and Goff, B. (1986). Televising legislatures: An economic analysis.Journal of Law and Economics 29: 405–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougan, W. and Munger, M. (1989). The rationality of ideology.Journal of Law and Economics 32: 119–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957).An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R., Jr. (1973).Congressmen in committees. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R., Jr. (1978).Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J. (1977). On the decline of competition in congressional elections.American Political Science Review 71: 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, B.L. and Grier, K.B. (1993). On the (mis)measurement of legislator ideology and shirking.Public Choice 76: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J. and Brandes, S. (1983). State population and the electoral success of senators.American Journal of Political Science 27: 808–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. (1987) Running scared: Elections and congressional politics in the 1980s. In M. McCubbins and T. Sullivan (Eds.),Congress: Structure and policy 39–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalt, J and Zupan, M. (1984). Capture and ideology in the economic theory of politics.American Economic Review 74: 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalt, J and Zupan, M. (1990). The apparent ideological behavior of legislators: Testing for principal-agent slack in political institutions.Journal of Law and Economics 33: 103–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. and Rubin, P. (1979). Self-interest, ideology, and logrolling in congressional voting.Journal of Law and Economics 22: 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott J., Jr. (1986). Brand names and barriers to entry in political markets.Public Choice 51: 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J., Jr. (1987). Political cheating.Public Choice 52: 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J., Jr. (1990). Attendance rates, political shirking, and the effect of post-elective office employment.Economic Inquiry 18: 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J., Jr and Reed, W. R. (1989). Shirking and sorting in a political market with finite-lived politicians.Public Choice 54: 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. and Topel, R. (1985) Estimation and inference in two-step econometric models.Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3: 370–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • The official Catholic directory (1960, 1970, 1980). New York: P.J. Kennedy and Sons.

  • Pagan, A. (1984). Econometric issues in the analysis of regressions with generated regressors.International Economic Review 25: 221–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation.Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1984). Constituent interest and congressional voting.Journal of Law and Economics 27: 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (1989). Patterns of congressional voting. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Scammon, R. (Ed.),America votes. (1959, 1962, 1964). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scammon, R. (Ed.),American votes. (1966, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1973, 1975). Washington: Congressional Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scammon, R. and McGillivray, A. (Eds.)America votes. (1977, 1979, 1981, 1983, 1985, 1987). Washington: Congressional Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schantz, H. (1980). Contested and uncontested primaries for the U.S. House.Legislative Studies Quarterly 5: 545–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation.Bell Journal of Economics 2: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1972). Economic competition and political competition.Public Choice 37: 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1980, 1982, 1986).State and metropolitan area data book. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1964–1987).Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. (1989). Shirking, political support, and agency costs in political markets. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am indebted to the members of my dissertation committee — Harold Demsetz (Chair), Jeffry Frieden, Benjamin Klein, Thomas Schwartz, Carol Simon, and Michael Waldman — for their invaluable assistance. I also acknowledge the helpful comments of Trudy Cameron, Paul Clyde, Kevin Grier, John Lott, Russell Roberts, and seminar participants at UCLA and the University of Chicago. The Bradley Foundation and the Foundation for Research in Economics and Education provided financial support. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Justice. Any errors are my own.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, M.B. Shirking and political support in the U.S. Senate, 1964–1984. Public Choice 76, 103–123 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049345

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049345

Keywords

Navigation