Skip to main content
Log in

Bureaucracy, altruism, and monetary policy

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has recently been argued that the fiscal relationship between the Federal Reserve and the Treasury, by which the Fed keeps a portion of its earnings, imparts an inflationary bias to monetary policy because that relationship gives the Fed an incentive to increase its earnings by increasing the monetary base. This hypothesis is tested within the framework of a Federal Reserve objective function incorporating bureaucratic and social goals, and no evidence is found to support it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balke, N.S., and Gordon, R.J. (1986). Appendix B: Historical data. In R.J. Gordon (Ed.),The American business cycle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, W.J., Mounts, W.S. and Sowell, C. (1988). The Federal Reserve as a bureaucracy: An examination of expense-preference behavior.Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 20 (May): 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,Annual Reports (1914–87),Federal Reserve Bulletins (monthly, 1915–88),Banking and Monetary Statistics, 1914–41 (1943),Banking and Monetary Statistics, 1941–70 (1976),Annual Statistical Digests (1976–86), andMinutes of the Federal Open Market Committee and its Executive Committee, 1942–1947.

  • Cooley, T.F. and LeRoy, S.F. (1981). Identification and estimation of money demand.American Economic Review 71 (December): 825–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. and Schwartz, A.J. (1963).A monetary history of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfeld, S.M. (1976). The case of the missing money.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 683–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R.W. (1955).A study of saving in the United States, Vol. I. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfriend, M. and Hargraves, M. (1983). A historical assessment of the rationale and functions of reserve requirements. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond1982 Annual Report, 5–23.

  • Krooss, H.E. (Ed.), (1969).Documentary history of banking and currency in the United States, Vol. IV. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, F.J. and Meulendyke, A.M. (1979). Monetary policy and open market operations in 1978. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkQuarterly Review (Spring): 53–66.

  • Mankiw, N.G. (1987). The optimal collection of seigniorage: Theory and evidence.Journal of Monetary Economics 20 (September): 327–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, W.D. (1986). Federal deficits, macrostabilization goals, and Federal Reserve behavior.Economic Inquiry 24 (April): 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shughart, W.F. and Tollison, R.D. (1983). Preliminary evidence on the use of inputs by the Federal Reserve system.American Economic Review 73 (June): 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toma, M. (1982). Inflationary bias of the Federal Reserve system: A bureaucratic perspective.Journal of Monetary Economics 10 (September): 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toma, M. (1985). A duopoly theory of government money production: The 1930s and 1940s.Journal of Monetary Economics 15 (May): 363–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J.H. (1967). A model of Federal Reserve behavior. In G. Horwich (Ed.),Monetary process and policy. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J.H. and Wood, N.L. (1985).Financial markets. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful to Mike Cox, Leroy Laney, Jerry O'Driscoll, and Ken Robinson for helpful discussions, to Priscilla Cooke, Faye Kisel, Steve Prue, and John Sciortino for research assistance, and to an anonymous referee for improvements in exposition. Research was supported by the Wake Forest University Graduate Council and was partly carried out at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, which generously provided the use of its facilities. None of these individuals or institutions necessarily subscribes to the views presented here.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crihfield, J.B., Wood, J.H. Bureaucracy, altruism, and monetary policy. Public Choice 76, 233–247 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049322

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049322

Keywords

Navigation