Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics, power, and advocacy

Psychologists in the criminal justice system

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Reference Notes

  1. Zusman,J. Responsible case advocacy for the mentally ill. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1981.

References

  1. American Bar Association.Model rules of professional conduct. Chicago, Illinois: American Bar Association, 1980. (Discussion draft; also appears as Working draft, 1981.)

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association.Clinical aspects of the violent individual. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angell, R. C. The ethical problems of applied sociology. In P.F. Lazarsfeld, W. H. Sewell, & H. L. Wilensky, eds.,The uses of sociology. New York: Basic Books, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bard, M., & Berkowitz, B. Training police as specialists in family crisis intervention: A community psychology action project.Community Mental Health Journal, 1967,3, 315–317.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barlow, D. H. On the relation of clinical research to elinical practice: Current issues, new directions.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1981,49, 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beigler, J. S. Psychiatry and confidentiality: A position paper prepared for submission to The President's Commission on Mental Health.American Psychoanalytic Association Newsletter, July 1978,12, 7–8. (Summary)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biddle, B. J., & Thomas, E. J.Role theory: Concepts and research. New York: Wiley, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bok, Sissela. Whistleblowing and professional responsibilities. In Daniel Callahan & Sissela Bok, eds.,Ethics teaching in higher education. New York: Plenum Press 1980. (Hastings Center series on ethics)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brodsky, S. L. Shared results and open files with the client.Professional Psychology, 1972,4, 362–364.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brodsky, S. L. Go away; I'm looking for the truth: Research utilization in corrections.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1977,4, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brodsky, S. L. Ethical issues for psychologists in corrections. In J. Monahan, ed.,Who is the client? The ethics of psychological intervention in the criminal justice system. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brodsky, S. L., & Hobart, S. Blame models and assailant research.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1978,5, 379–388.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brodsky, S. L., & Horn, C. L. The politics of correctional treatment. In A. A. Roberts, ed.,Correctional treatment of the offender. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buffum, P. C.Homosexuality in prisons. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Burgess, A.A clockwork orange. New York: Norton, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burt, R. A.Taking care of strangers: The rule of law in doctor-patient relations. New York: Free Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chalk, R., Frankel, M.S., & Chafer, S. B.AAAS professional ethics project: Professional ethics activities in the scientific and engineering societies. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clark, R.Crime in America. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Clemons, R. Proposed legal regulation of applied behavior analysis in prisons: Consumer issues and concerns.Arizona Law Review, 1975,17, 127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clingempeel, W. G., Mulvey, E., & Repucci, N. D. A national study of ethical dilemmas of psychologists in the criminal justice system. In J. Monahan, ed.,Who is the client? The ethics of psychological intervention in the criminal justice system. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen, A. K., Cole, G. F., & Bailey, R. G.Prison violence. Lexinton, Massachusetts; Heath & Co., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Corsini, R. J. Two therapeutic groups that failed.Journal of Correctional Psychology. 1956,1, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davidson, W. S., & Rappaport, J. Toward a model for advocacy: Values, roles and conceptions from community psychology. In G. H. Weber & G. J. McCall, eds.,Social scientists as advocates: Views from the applied disciplines. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dershowitz, A. The psychiatrist's power in civil commitment.Psychology Today, February 1969, pp. 43–47.

  25. Developments in the law—Conflicts of interest in the legal profession.Harvard Law Review, 1981,94, 1244–1503.

  26. Ennis, B. J., & Emery, R. D.The rights of mental patients: The revised edition of the basic ACLU guide to a mental patient's rights. New York: Avon Books, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association 1963. (Previous version 1953).

  28. Ethical principles of psychologists. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1981. (Previous versions, Ethical standards of psychologists, 1979, 1973).

  29. Fersch, E. A.Psychology and psychiatry in courts and corrections: Controversy and change New York: Wiley, 1980a.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fersch, E. A. Ethical issues for psychologists in court settings. In J. Monahan, ed.,Who is the client? The ethics of psychological intervention in the criminal justice system. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1980b.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Friedman, P. Legal regulation of applied behavior analysis in mental institutions and prisons.Arizona Law Review, 1975,17, 75–104.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Friedmann, W.Law in a changing society. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gilette, R. Dissenters hospitalized, Soviet doctor confirms: Citizens get psychiatric treatment for making “groundless complaints”, scientific paper says.Los Angeles Times, May 31, 1981, pp. 1, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Goldman, A. H.The moral foundation of professional ethics. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Halleck, S. L.The politics of therapy. New York: Science House, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hollingshead, A. B., & Redlich, F. C.Social class and mental illness New York. Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Institute of Judicial Administration-American Bar Association Joint Commission on Juvenile Justice Standards.Standards relating to juvenile delinquency and sanctions: Tentative Draft. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Katz, J. Informed consent—A fairy tale? Law's vision.University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 1977,39, 137–174.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Katz, J.Experimentation with human beings. New York: Russell Sage, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kaufman, E. Can comprehensive mental health, care be provided in an overcrowded prison system?Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 1973,1, 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kelman, H.A time to speak: On human values and social research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kirp, D. L. Proceduralism and bureaucracy: Due process in the school setting.Stanford Law Review, 1976,28, 841–876.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lambert, N.Variants of consultation service to schools and implications for training. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Loftus, E. F.Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lourens, P. J. D. Skinner versus freedom: Concurrence and dissent.Cumberland-Sanford Law Review, 1973–1974,4, 425–439.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mann, P. A. Ethical issues for psychologists in police agencies. In J. Monahan, ed.,Who is the client? The ethics of psychological intervention in the criminal justice, system. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Monahan, J.The clinical prediction of violent vehavior. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1981. (Crime and delinquency issues)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Monahan, J. (ed.)Who is the client? The ethics of psychological intervention in the criminal justice system. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Morse, S. J. Crazy behavior, morals, and science: An analysis of mental health law.Southern California Law Review, 1978,51, 527–654. Abbreviated version, Law and mental health professionals.Professional Psychology, 1978s,9, 389–399.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Morse, S. J. Mental health law: Governmental regulation of disordered persons and the role of the professional psychologist. In B. D. Sales, ed.,The professional psychologist's handbook. New York: Plenum Press, forthcoming.

  51. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.Research involving prisoners: Report and recommendations. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Parsons, T.The social system. New York: Free Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Perlin, M. L. The legal status of the psychologist in the courtroom.Mental Disability law Reporter, 1980,4, 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Psychiatrists and psychologists to be boarded as specialists in forensic area.Forensic Issues, 1979,1, 4.

  55. Quinney, R., ed.Criminal justice in America: A critical understanding. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rappaport, J., Lamiell, J. T., & Seidman, E. Ethical issues for psychologists in the juvenile justice system: Know and tell. In J. Monahan, ed.,Who is the client? The ethics of psychological intervention in the criminal justice system. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Robitscher, J. B.The powers of psychiatry. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Co., 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Roscoe Pound-American Trial Lawyers Foundation, Commission on Professional Responsibility.The American lawyer's code of conduct. Washington, D.C.: Roscoe Pound-American Trial Lawyer's Foundation, 1980. (Public discussion draft)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rosenthal, D. E.Lawyer and client: Who's in charge? New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ryan, W.Blaming the victim. New York: Vintage, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sadoff, R. L., & Kopolow, L. E. The mental health professional's role in patient advocacy. In L. E. Kopolow & H. Bloom.Mental health advocacy: An emerging force in consumer's rights. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Schur, E. M.Radical non-intervention: Rethinking the delinquency problem. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Seidman, E. Justice, values, and social sciences: Unexamined premises. In R. J. Simon, ed.,Research in law and sociology: An annual compilation of research, Vol. 1. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shapiro, M. H., & Spece, R. G.Cases, materials and problems on bioethics and law. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Co., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Spece, R. G. Conditioning and other technologies used to “treat?” “rehabilitate?” “demolish?” prisoners and mental patients.Southern California Law Review, 197245, 616–684.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Stone, A.Mental health and law: A system in transition. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Stone, C. D.Where the law ends. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Suggs, D. L. The use of psychological research by the judiciary: Do the courts adequately assess the validity of the research?Law and Human Behavior, 1979,3, 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Tapp, J. L., & Levine, F. J., eds.Law, justice and the individual in society: Psychological and legal issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Task Force on the Role of Psychology in the Criminal Justice System Report. In John Monahan, ed.,Who is the client? The ethics of psychological intervention in the criminal justice system. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1980. (Earlier version inAmerican Psychologist, 1978,33, 1099–1113.)

  71. Thompson, Dennis F. Paternalism in medicine, law, and public policy. In Daniel Callahan & Sissela Bok, ed.,Ethics teaching in higher education. New York: Plenum Press, 1980. (Hastings Center series on ethics)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Twain, D., McGee, R., & Bennett, L. A. Functional areas of psychological activity. In S. L. Brodsky, ed., Psychologists in the criminal justice system. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Walker, V. H.Nursing and ritualistic practice. New York: Macmillan Co., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wexler, D. B. Reflections on the legal regulation of behavior modification in institutional settings.Arizona Law Review, 1975,17, 132–143.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Yarmey, A. D.The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York: Free Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

    Martha A. Lyon

  2. Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

    Martha A. Lyon

  3. Law Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

    Martin L. Levine

  4. School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

    Martin L. Levine

Authors
  1. Martha A. Lyon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin L. Levine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by NIMH Training grant No. 5 T24 MH 15901-02.

About this article

Cite this article

Lyon, M.A., Levine, M.L. Ethics, power, and advocacy. Law Hum Behav 6, 65–85 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049315

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049315

Search

Navigation