Advertisement

Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 93–106 | Cite as

Egg attendance and brooding by males of the giant water bugLethocerus medius (Guerin) in the field (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae)

  • Robert L. Smith
  • Eric Larsen
Article

Abstract

Males of the giant water bug Lethocerus medius(Guerin) typify their monobasic subfamily, the Lethocerinae, in that they do not brood eggs attached to their backs as do males of all members of the subfamily Belostomatinae. Exclusive male parental investment as expressed in the Belostomatinae is extremely rare behavior among animals, and evolution of the trait is obscure. Lethocerus mediusmales apparently remain with their mates through oviposition and are consistently found in attendance of eggs after the female has departed. This behavior may enhance paternity assurance at no cost in opportunity for polygyny. Two double clutches of eggs were found, from which we infer the potential for polygynous matings and shared parental investment. Male L. mediusbrood attended egg clutches above the surface of the water, where they may moisten them, shade them, and defend them against predation. Egg attendance/brooding by L. mediusand other Lethocerusspecies may represent a plesiomorphic state from which paternal back- brooding evolved in the Belostomatinae.

Key words

Belostomatidae giant water bugs paternal care eggs reproduction behavior brooding evolution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Böttger, K. (1974). Zur Biologie vonSphaerodema grassei ghesquierei.Arch. Hydrobiol. 74: 100–122.Google Scholar
  2. Bragg, A. N. (1955). In quest of the spadefoots.New Mex. Q. 4: 345–357.Google Scholar
  3. Brockelman, W. Y. (1969). An analysis of density effects and predation inBufo americanus tadpoles.Ecology 50: 632–644.Google Scholar
  4. Cobben, R. H. (1968).Evolutionary Trends in Heteroptera, Part I. Eggs, Architecture of the Shell, Gross Embryology and Eclosion, Cent. Agr. Publ. Doc. Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  5. Cullen, M. J. (1969). The biology of the giant water bugs (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae) in Trinidad.Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. A 44: 123–137.Google Scholar
  6. De Carlo, J. M. (1962). Consideraciones sobre la biologia deLethocerus mazzai De Carlo (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae).Physis 23: 143–151.Google Scholar
  7. Hoffman, W. E. (1924). Biological notes onLethocerus americanus.Psyche 31: 175–183.Google Scholar
  8. Heyer, R. W., and Belin, M. S. (1973). Ecological notes on five sympatricLeptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae) from Equador.Herpetologica. 29: 66–72.Google Scholar
  9. Heyer, R. W., McDiarmid, R. W., and Weigmann, D. L. (1975). Tadpoles, predation, and pond habits in the tropics.Biotropica 7: 100–111.Google Scholar
  10. Hungerford, H. B. (1925). Notes on the giant water bugs.Psyche 32: 88–91.Google Scholar
  11. Ichikawa, N. (1988). Male brooding behavior of the giant water bugLethocerus deyrollei Vuillefroy (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).J. Ethol. 6: 121–127.Google Scholar
  12. Ichikawa, N. (1989a). Repeated copulations benefit of (sic) female inLethocerus deyrollei Vuillefroy (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).J. Ethol. 7: 113–117.Google Scholar
  13. Ichikawa, N. (1989b). Breeding strategy of the male brooding water bug,Diplonychus major Esaki (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae): Is back space limiting?J. Ethol. 7: 133–140.Google Scholar
  14. Ichikawa, N. (1990). Egg mass destroying behavior of the female giant water bugLethocerus deyrollei Vuillefroy (Heteroptera: Belostomatidea).J. Ethol. 8: 5–11.Google Scholar
  15. Jawale, S. M., and Ranade, D. R. (1988). Observations on the parental care inSphaerodema (=Diplonychus) rusticum Fabr.Geobios 15: 44–46.Google Scholar
  16. Kopelke, J. P. (1981). Morphological and biological studies on Belostomatidae Heteroptera with reference to the Central American speciesBelostoma ellipticum andBelostoma thomasi.Ento mol. Abh. (Dres.) 44: 59–80.Google Scholar
  17. Kraus, W. F. (1989a). Surface wave communication during courtship in the giant water bug,Abedus indentatus (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 62: 316–328.Google Scholar
  18. Kraus, W. F. (1989b). Is male back space limiting? An investigation into the reproductive demography of the giant water bug,Abedus indentatus (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).J. Insect. Behav. 2: 623–648.Google Scholar
  19. Kraus, W. F., Gonzales, M. J., and Vehrencamp, S. L. (1989). Egg development and an evaluation of some of the costs and benefits of paternal care in the belostomatidAbedus indentatus (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 62: 548–562.Google Scholar
  20. Kruse, K. C. (1990). Male backspace availability in the giant water bug (Belostoma flumineum Say),Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 281–289.Google Scholar
  21. Lauck, D. R., and Menke, A. S. (1961). The higher classification of the Belostomatidae (Hemiptera).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 54: 664–657.Google Scholar
  22. Mahner, M. (1992).Systema Cryptoceratorum Phylogeneticum, Ein phylogenetisches System der Wasserwanzen (Hemiptera-Heteroptera), Ph.D. dissertation, Freie Universität, Berlin.Google Scholar
  23. Maynard Smith, J. (1977). Parental Investment: A prospective analysis.Anim. Behav. 25: 1–9.Google Scholar
  24. Menke, A. S. (1979a). Introduction. In Menke, A. S. (ed.),The Semiaquatic and Aquatic Hemiptera of California (Heteroptera: Hemiptera), Bulletin California Insect Survey, Vol. 21, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  25. Menke, A. S. (1979b). Family Belostomatidae—giant water bugs, electric light bugs, toe biters. In Menke, A. S. (ed.),The Semiaquatic and Aquatic Hemiptera of California (Heteroptera: Hemiptera), Bull. Calif. Insect Surv., Vol. 21, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  26. Pomeroy, L. V. (1981).Developmental Polymorphism in the Tadpoles of the Spadefoot Toad Scaphiopus multiplicatus, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
  27. Popov, Y. A. (1971). Historical Development of the Hemipterous Infraorder Nepomorpha.Tr. Paleontol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR 129: 1–228 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  28. Rankin, K. P. (1935). Life history ofLethocerus americanus (Leidy) (Hemiptera-Belostomatidae).Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 22: 479–491.Google Scholar
  29. Ridley, M. (1978). Paternal care.Anim. Behav. 26: 904–932.Google Scholar
  30. Slater, F. W. (1899). The egg-carrying habit toZaitha.Am. Nat. 33: 931–933.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, R. L. (1975).Bionomics and Behavior of Abedus herbertiwith Comparative Observations on Belostoma flumineumand Lethocerus medius (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae), Ph.D., dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, R. L. (1976a). Brooding behavior of a male water bugBelostoma flumineum (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 49: 333–343.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, R. L. (1976b). Male brooding behavior of the water bugAbedus herberti (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69: 740–747.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, R. L. (1979a). Paternity assurance and altered roles in the mating behavior of a giant water bugAbedus herberti (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).Anim. Behav. 27: 716–725.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, R. L. (1979b). Repeated copulation and sperm precedence: Paternity assurance for a male brooding water bug.Science 205: 1029–1031.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, R. L. (1980). Evolution of exclusive postcopulatory paternal care in the insects.Fla. Entomol. 63: 65–78.Google Scholar
  37. Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry, W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Tawfik, M. F. S. (1969). The life history of the giant water bugLethocerus niloticus Stael (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae).Bull. Soc. Entomol. Egypte. 53: 299–310.Google Scholar
  39. Torre Bueno, J. R. de la (1906). Life histories of North American water bugs. I. Life history ofBelostoma fluminea Say.Can. Entomol. 38: 189–197.Google Scholar
  40. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In. Campbell, B. G. (ed.)Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar
  41. Venkatesan, P. (1983). Male brooding behavior ofDiplonychus indicus Venk. & Rao (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 56: 80–87.Google Scholar
  42. Voelker, J. (1966). Wasserwanzen als obligatorische Schneckenfresser im Nildelta (Limnogeton fiebert Mayr).Z. Tropenmed. Parasitol. 17: 155–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Voelker, J. (1968). Untersuchungen zu Ernährung, Fortpflanzungsbiologie und Entwicklung vonLimnogeton fieberi Mayr (Belostomatidae, Hemiptera) als Beitrag zur Kenntnis von natürlichen Feinden tropischer Süsswasserschnecken.Entomol. Mitt. Zool. Staatsinst. Zool. Mus. Hamburg 3: 1–24.Google Scholar
  44. Wittenberger, J. F. (1979). The evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals in Marler, P., and Vandenbergh, J. (eds.),Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology. Social Behavior and Communication, Plenum Press, New York, Vol. 3, pp. 271–349.Google Scholar
  45. Xia, X. (1992). Uncertainty of paternity can select against paternal care.Am. Nat. 139: 1126–1129.Google Scholar
  46. Zeh, D. W., and Smith, R. L. (1985). Paternal investment by terrestrial arthropods.Am. Zool. 25: 785–805.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Smith
    • 1
  • Eric Larsen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of ArizonaTucson
  2. 2.Department of BiologyVillanova UniversityVillanova

Personalised recommendations