Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting external sulphur requirement of alfalfa from sulphate sorption isotherm of Tanzanian soils

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For Tanzanian soils dominant in hydrous oxides of iron and amorphous ferri-alumino silicate, a 48-hour (hr) mixing period with the sulphate (SO4) solution was adequate for a near-equilibrium condition. Although differing in their SO4 sorption capacity, all the soils sorbed SO4 at or beyond 1µg ml−1 sulphur (S) concentration in the supernatant. Hydroxyl (OH) ions were displaced during SO4 sorption as indicated by a significant positive correlation between the amount of sorbed SO4 and the difference in pH values determined in 0.1N K2 SO4 and 0.1N KCl, i.e. the dpH values.

In a greenhouse experiment, alfalfa was grown on eight soils at six adjusted S concentrations. Sulphur deficiency symptoms appeared in the control pots of those soils which were low in native sorbed SO4, SO4 sorption capacity and initial soil solution S concentration. Sulphur fertilization increased dry matter (DM) yield as well as response to applied S. The external S concentration, i.e. adjusted S concentration required for 95% of the maximum DM yield, ranged from 0.8 to 8.2µg S ml−1 with values less than 2.0 on most of the soils. The external S concentration decreased hyperbolically as the SO4 sorption capacity of the soils increased. The total amount of fertilizer S required to obtain the external S concentration in solution, and at the same time satisfy the SO4 sorption capacity of the soil at the external S concentration (determined from the sorption isotherm) was defined as the external S requirement for the specified yield level of alfalfa. The external S requirement for 95% of the maximum yield of alfalfa varied from soil to soil due to differences in their capacity and intensity for S nutrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexaides CA and Jackson ML (1966) Quantitative clay mineralogical analysis of soils and sediments. Clays and Clay Minerals 14, 35–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allison LE (1965) Organic carbon. In Black CA, Evans DD, Ensminger LE, White JL and Clark FE, eds. Methods of soil analysis, pp 1367–1379. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bardsley CE and Lancaster JD (1960) Determination of reserve sulphur and soluble sulphate in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 24, 265–268

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beckwith RS (1964) Sorbed phophate at standard supernatant concentration as an estimate of the phosphate needs of soils. Aust J Exp Agric and An Husb 5, 52–58

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bremner JM (1965) Total nitrogen. In Black CA, Evans DD, Ensminger LE, White JL and Clark FE, eds. Methods of soil analysis, pp. 1149–1178. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chao TT, Harward ME and Fang SC (1965) Exchange reactions between hydroxyl and sulphate ions in soils. Soil Sci 99, 104–108

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fox RL, Plucknett DL and Whitney AS (1968) Phosphate requirements of Hawaiian latosols and residual effects of fertilizer phosphorus. Int Cong Soil Sci Trans 9th (Adelaide, Australia) 2, 301–310

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fox RL and Kamprath EJ (1970) Phosphate sorption isotherms for evaluating the phosphate requirements of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 34, 902–907

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harward ME and Reisenauer HM (1966) Reactions and movements of inorganic soil sulphur. Soil Sci 101, 326–335

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hasan SM, Fox RL and Boyd CC (1970) Solubility and availability of sorbed sulphate in Hawaiian soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 34, 897–901

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson ML (1967) Soil chemical analysis advance course. Madison, Wisconsin: ML Jackson

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kilmer VJ (1965) Silicon. In Black CA, Evans DD, Ensminger LE, White JL and Clark FE, eds. Methods of soil analysis, pp 959–962. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy

    Google Scholar 

  13. McLean EO (1965) Aluminium. In Black CA, Evans DD, Ensminger LE, White JL and Clark FE, eds. Methods of soil analysis, pp 978–998. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ozanne PG and Shaw TC (1968) Advantages of the recently developed phosphate sorption test over the older extractant methods for soil phosphate. Int Cong Soil Sci Trans 9th (Adelaide, Australia) 2, 273–280

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rajan SSS (1978) Sulphate sorbed on hydrous alumina, ligands displaced and changes in surface charge. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42, 39–44

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rengasamy P, Sarma VAK and Krishna Murthi GSR (1975) Quantitative mineralogical analysis of soil clays containing amorphous materials: A modification of the Alexaides and Jackson procedure. Clays and Clay Minerals 23, 78–80

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schwertmann U and Fischer WR (1973) Natural ‘amorphous’ ferric hydroxide. Geoderma 10, 237–247

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singh BR, Uriyo AP and Kilasara M (1979) Sorption of sulphate and distribution of total, sulphate and mineralisable sulphur in some tropical soil profiles in Tanzania. J Sci Food Agric 30, 8–14

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh T, Gangwar BR and Mehrotra CL (1971) Phosphate sorption studies to determine phosphorus requirement of soil for cereal crops. Proc Int Symp on Soil Fert Evaluation (New Delhi) I, 111–118

    Google Scholar 

  20. Soil Survey Staff (1975) Soil Taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Agric Handbook 436. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tabatabai MA and Bremner JM (1970) A simple turbidimetric method for determining total sulphur in plant material. Agron J 62, 805–806

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Part of a thesis by the senior author for the MSc (Agric) degree of the University of Dar es Salaam

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swai, S., Singh, B. Predicting external sulphur requirement of alfalfa from sulphate sorption isotherm of Tanzanian soils. Fertilizer Research 3, 411–422 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048944

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048944

Key words

Navigation