Skip to main content
Log in

Superharmonic extensions, mean values and Riesz measures

  • Published:
Potential Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are two interrelated themes to this paper. One is the generalization of recent harmonic and superharmonic extension theorems to the case where the removable set is not relatively closed, with the simultaneous weakening of other hypotheses in the harmonic case. The other is the use of results which are well-known in geometric measure theory, to prove theorems on the relative behaviour of the spherical mean values of a δ-subharmonic and a superharmonic function, and to establish new criteria for harmonic and superharmonic extensions. Some related theorems establish sufficient conditions for a polar set to be positive for the Riesz measure of a δ-subharmonic function, a useful formula for the restriction of such a measure to the infinity set of a superharmonic function, and a condition for such a restriction to be absolutely continuous with respect to an appropriate Hausdorff measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armitage, D. H.: ‘Mean values and associated measures of superharmonic functions’,Hiroshima Math. J. 13 (1983), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arsove, M. and Leutwiler, H.: ‘Quasi-bounded and singular functions’,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 189 (1974), 276–302.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Besicovitch, A. S.: ‘On sufficient conditions for a function to be analytic, and on behaviour of analytic functions in the neighbourhood of non-isolated singular points’,Proc. London Math. Soc. 32(2) (1931), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Besicovitch, A. S.: ‘A general form of the covering principle and relative differentiation of additive functions’,Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 41 (1945), 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Besicovitch, A. S.: ‘A general form of the covering principle and relative differentiation of additive functions II’,Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 42 (1946), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Besicovitch, A. S.: ‘On the definition of tangents to sets of infinite linear measure’,Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 52 (1956), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brelot, M.: ‘Refinements on the superharmonic continuation’,Hokkaido Math. J. 10 (1981), 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doob, J. L.:Classical Potential Theory and Its Probabilistic Counterpart, Springer-Verlag (1984).

  9. Falconer, K. J.:The Geometry of Fractal Sets, Cambridge University Press (1985).

  10. Federer, H.:Geometric Measure Theory, Springer-Verlag (1969).

  11. Gardiner, S. J.: ‘Removable singularities for subharmonic functions’,Pacific J. Math. 147 (1991), 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hayman, W. K. and Kennedy, P. B.:Subharmonic Functions, Vol. 1, Academic Press (1976).

  13. Kaufman, R. and Wu, J.-M.: ‘Removable singularities for analytic or subharmonic functions’,Ark. Mat. 18 (1980), 107–116. Correction,ibid. 21 (1983), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuran, Ü.: ‘Some extension theorems for harmonic, superharmonic and holomorphic functions’,J. London Math. Soc. 22(2) (1980), 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marstrand, J. M.: ‘The (φ,s)-regular subsets ofn-space’,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 113 (1964), 369–392.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wallin, H.: ‘Hausdorff measures and generalized differentiation’,Math. Ann. 183 (1969), 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watson, N.A. Superharmonic extensions, mean values and Riesz measures. Potential Anal 2, 269–294 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048511

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048511

Mathematics Subject Classification (1991)

Key words

Navigation