Abstract
Letu be a function on ℝm×ℝn, wherem⩾2 andn⩾2, such thatu(x, .) is subharmonic on ℝn for each fixedx in ℝm andu(.,y) is subharmonic on ℝm for each fixedy in ℝn. We give a local integrability condition which ensures the subharmonicity ofu on ℝm×ℝn, and we show that this condition is close to being sharp. In particular, the local integrability of (log+ u +)m+n−2+α is enough to secure the subharmonicity ofu if α>0, but not if α<0.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arsove, M. G.: ‘On subharmonicity of doubly subharmonic functions’,Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (1966), 622–626.
Avanissian, V.: ‘Fonctions plurisousharmoniques et fonctions doublement sousharmoniques’,Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 78 (1961), 101–161.
Domar, Y.: ‘On the existence of a largest subharmonic minorant of a given function’,Ark. Mat. 3 (1957), 429–440.
Riihentaus, J.: ‘On a theorem of Avanissian-Arsove’,Exposition. Math. 7 (1989), 69–72.
Wiegerinck, J.: ‘Separately subharmonic functions need not be subharmonic’,Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 104 (1988), 770–771.
Wiegerinck, J. and Zeinstra, R.: ‘Separately subharmonic functions: when are they subharmonic’,Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 52 (1991), 245–249.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Armitage, D.H., Gardiner, S.J. Conditions for separately subharmonic functions to be subharmonic. Potential Anal 2, 255–261 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048509
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048509