Abstract
Professional magistrates' sentencing procedures were examined as prototypic cases of expert processes involved in making just decisions, with analysis of their attention to information and the inferences they drew from case details and their own patterned knowledge. Magistrates' sorting and verbalized sentencing of six shoplifting cases revealed that they were accessing and using three schemas for categorizing shoplifters, with different emphases and valences, and different penalties. The schemas categorized shoplifters as cases of greed, need, or troubled persons. Tough magistrates followed the greed schema more than the lenient who followed the need and troubled schemas more consistently. Information use and inferences in a sample case illustrate schema differences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baier, K. (1958).The Moral Point of View Basic Books, New York.
Bebeau, M. J., Rest, J. R., & Yamoor, C. M. (1985). Measuring dental students' ethical sensitivity.J. Dental Educ. 49(4): 225–235.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., and Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cog. Sci. 5: 121–152.
Cicourel, A. V. (1971).Cognitive Sociology Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.
Crisham, P. (1981). Measuring moral judgment in nursing dilemmas.Nurs. Res. 30(2): 104–110.
deGroot, A. (1965).Thought and Choice in Chess Basic Books, New York.
Diamond, S. S. (1981). Exploring sources of sentence disparity. In Sales, B. D.The Trial Process: Perspectives in Law & Psychology, Vol. 2 Plenum Press, New York, pp. 387–412.
Gilligan, C. (1982).In a Different Voice Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Green, E. G. (1961).Judicial Attitudes in Sentencing MacMillan, London.
Greenberg, M. S., and Ruback, R. B. (1982).Social Psychology and the Criminal Justice System Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.
Hogarth, J. (1971).Sentencing as a Human Process University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Holstein, J. A. (1985). Jurors' interpretations and jury decision making.Law Human Behav. 9(1): 83–99.
Homel, R. J. (1983). Sentencing in magistrates' courts: Some lessons from a study of drinking drivers. In Findlay, M., Egger, S., and Sutton, J. (eds.),Issues in Criminal Justice Administration Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp. 109–125.
Homel, R. (1988).Policing and Punishing the Drink Driver Springer Verlag, New York.
Hood, R., and Sparks, R. F. (1972).Key Issues in Criminology World University Library, London.
Kerr, N., Atkin, R., Strasser, G., Meek, D., Holt, R., and Davis, J. (1976). Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rules on judgments of mock jurors.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 34(2): 282–294.
Kohlberg, L. (1984).Essays on Moral Development, Vol. 2: The Psychology of Moral Development Harper & Row, New York.
Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., and Simon H. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems.Science 208: 1335–1342.
Lawrence, J. A. (in press). Expertise in judicial decision making. In Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R. and Farr, M. (eds).The Nature of Expertise, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Lawrence, J. A. (1984). Magisterial decision-making: Cognitive perspectives and processes used in courtroom information processing. In Müller, D. J., Blackman, D. E., and Chapman, A. M. (eds.),Psychology and Law Wiley, New York, pp. 319–331.
Lawrence, J. A. (1987). Verbal processing of the Defining Issues Test by principled and non-principled moral reasoners.J. Moral Educ. 16(2): 117–130.
Lawrence, J., and Helm, A. (1987). Consistencies and inconsistencies in nurses' moral reasoning.J. Moral Educ. 16(3): 167–176.
Lawrence, J., and Homel, R. (1987). Sentencing in magistrates' courts: The magistrate as professional decision-maker. In Potas, I. (ed.),Sentencing in Australia: Policies, Issues and Reform, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, pp. 151–191.
Lawrence, J. A., and Homel, R. (1988). Judicial decisions as outcomes of magistrates' schemas and court contexts. Paper presented at XXIV Congress of Psychology, Sydney.
Perkins, D. N., Allen, R., & Hafner, J. (1983). Difficulties in everyday reasoning. In Maxwell, W. (ed.),Thinking: The Expanding Frontier, Franklin Institute Press, Philadelphia, PA.
Rest, J. R. (1986).Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory, Praeger, New York.
Thomas, S. J., Rest, J. R., and Barnett, R. (1986). Moral judgment, behavior, decision-making and attitudes. In Rest, J. R. (ed.),Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory, Praeger, New York, pp. 133–175.
Voss, J. F., and Post, T. (in press). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., and Farr, M. (eds.),The Nature of Expertise, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lawrence, J.A. Making just decisions in magistrates' courts. Soc Just Res 2, 155–176 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048504
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048504