Abstract
This study focuses on how two fundamental social factors, structural power position and social status, affect attributions for relatively common, non-problematic exchange outcomes. We argue that the relative power and statuses of dyad members activate expectations of competence which in turn shape attributions in the situation. Subjects assumed the role of a typist described in a vignette of a transaction between a typist and a student needing a paper typed. We manipulated power positions in the vignette by varying the value and availability of the resource each actor desired; subject's sex and that of the fictive student represented social statuses. Despite the typicality of the exchange situation, results indicated that status and, to some extent power, created variation in the strength of attributions for the exchange outcome. Females, presumably expected to be more competent typists, made stronger self-attributions for the typing payment than males. Similarly, those in high power positions tended to attribute the payment more to themselves than occupants of low power positions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange.Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2: 267–299.
Arkin, R. M., Appelman, A. J., and Burger, J. M. (1980). Social anxiety, self-presentation, and the self-serving bias in causal attributions.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 23–35.
Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., and Zelditch, M. Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction.Am. Sociol. Rev. 37: 241–255.
Berger, J., and Conner, T. L. (1969). Performance expectations and behavior in small groups.Acta Sociol. 12: 186–197.
Berger, J., and Fisek, M. H. (1970). Consistent and inconsistent status characteristics and the determination of power and prestige orders.Sociometry 33: 287–304.
Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., and Zelditch, M. Jr. (1980). Status organizing processes.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 6: 479–508.
Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 36: 56–71.
Cook, K. S., and Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks.Am. Sociol. Rev. 43: 721–739.
Cook, K. S., Hegtvedt, K. A., and Yamagishi, T. (1987). Structural inequality, legitimation and reactions to inequity in exchange networks. In Webster, M., and Foschi, M. (eds),Status Generalization: New Theory and Research Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 291–308.
Cook, K. S. and Parcel, T. L. (1977). Equity theory: Directions for future research.Sociol. Inq. 47: 75–85.
Crittenden, K. S. (1983). Sociological aspects of attribution.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 9: 425–446.
Deaux, K. (1976). Sex: A perspective on the attribution process. In Harvey J. H., Ickes, W. J., and Kidd, R. F. (eds.),New Directions in Attribution Research, Vol. 1. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 335–352.
Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender.Am. Psychol. 39: 105–116.
Enzle, M. E., Harvey, M. D., and Wright, E. F. (1980). Personalism and distinctiveness.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39: 542–552.
Emerson, E. M. (1972). Exchange theory, Part II: Exchange relations and networks. In Berger, J., Zelditch, M., and Anderson, B. (eds.),Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, pp. 58–87.
Forgas, J. P. (1981). Epilogue: Everyday understanding and social cognition. In Forgas, J. P. (ed.),Social Cognition Academic Press, London, pp. 259–272.
Freese, L. (1974). Conditions for status equality.Sociometry 37: 147–188.
Freese, L., and Cohen, B. P. (1973). Eliminating status generalization.Sociometry 36: 177–193.
Gurin, P., Gurin, G., and Gurin, B. M. (1978). Personal and ideological aspects of internal and external control.Soc. Psychol. 41: 275–296.
Hamilton, V. L. (1978). Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution.Soc. Psychol. 41: 316–328.
Hamilton, V. L., and Sanders, J. (1981), The effect of roles and deeds on responsibility judgments: The normative structure of wrongdoing.Soc. Psychol. Quart. 39: 767–772.
Harvey, J. H., and Weary, G. (1984). Current issues in attribution theory and research.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 35: 427–459.
Heider, F. (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations Wiley, New York.
Hewstone, M. (ed.). (1983).Attribution Theory: Social and Functional Extensions Blackwell, Oxford.
Howard, J. A. (1984). Social influences on attribution: Blaming some victims more than others.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 47: 494–505.
Howard, J. A., and Pike, K. C. (1986). Ideological investment in cognitive processing: The influence of social statuses on attribution.Soc. Psychol. Quart. 49: 154–167.
Jaspars, J., Finchman, F. D., and Hewstone, M. (eds.). (1983).Attribution Theory and Research: Conceptual, Developmental and Social Dimensions Academic Press, London.
Kelley, H. H., and Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research.Ann. Rev. Psychol. 31: 457–501.
Keppel, G. (1973).Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Langer, E. J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W., and Kidd, R. F. (eds.),New Directions in Attribution Research, Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 35–58.
Lefcourt, H. M. (1976).Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research Wiley, New York.
Meeker, B. F., and Weitzel-O'Neill, P. A. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups.Am. Sociol. Rev. 43: 91–105.
Miller, D. T. (1976). Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 34: 901–906.
Miller, D. T., Smith, E. R., and Uleman, J. (1981). Measurement and interpretation of situational and dispositional attributions.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 17: 80–95.
Newman, H. (1981). Communication within ongoing intimate relationships: An attributional perspective.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 7: 59–70.
Otto, L. B., and Featherman, D. L. (1975). Social structure and psychological antecedents of self-estrangement and powerlessness.Am. Sociol. Rev. 40: 701–719.
Phares, E. J. (1976).Locus of Control in Personality General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process.Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 10: 174–220.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychol. Monogr. 80: 1–28.
Snyder, M. L., Stephen, W. G., and Rosenfield, D. (1976). Egotism and attribution.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 33: 435–441.
Solomon, S. (1978). Measuring dispositional and situational attributions.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 4: 589–594.
Stolte, J. (1983). The legitimation of structural inequality.Am. Sociol. Rev. 48: 331–342.
Tajfel, H., and Forgas, J. P. (1981). Social categorization: Cognition values and groups. In Forgas, J. P. (ed.),Social Cognition Academic Press, London, pp. 113–140.
Tetlock, P. E. (1981). The influence of self-presentation goals on attributional reports.Soc. Psychol. Quart. 44: 300–311.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory.J. Pers. 47: 245–287.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hegtvedt, K.A., Thompson, E.A. Attributions for fair exchange outcomes: The effects of power and status. Soc Just Res 2, 113–135 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048502
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048502