Abstract
Individualism has become so pervasive in modern society that it now undercuts the legitimacy of any collectivity or social institution. An emerging position challenges this individualism as excessive, offering in its stead a synthesis that recognizes the moral standing of both individual and community. This synthesis, the ‘I & We’ (or Responsive Community), traces its origins to two opposing historical positions. The Tory (or conservative) position views society as an organic whole, the sole source of authority, legitimacy, and value. Whigs (or liberals), in contrast, invest all value and legitimacy in the individual. The I & We view maintains that individual and society presuppose and necessitate one another, and that the tension between them is not only inevitable, but in part desirable; and, that attempts to redefine and alleviate the strain between individual and community provide the basis for social change. A renewed understanding of community's importance to the individual leads to a critique of psychological Whigism — overemphasis on the feelings and needs of the self — and also suggests a new approach to devising public policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., and Tipton, M. (1985).Habits of the Heart, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Benedict, R. (1934).Patterns of Culture, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Blau, P. M. (1964).Exchange and Power in Social Life, Wiley, New York.
Etzioni, A. (1974).Political Unification, Robert E. Krieger, New York.
Etzioni, A. (1988).The Moral Dimension, Free Press, New York.
Fried, C. (1984). Liberals and love.The New Republic, December 24, pp. 40–42.
Friedman, M. (1976). Aiming at the self: The paradox of encounter and the human potential movement.J. Human. Psychol. 16(2): 5–34.
Friedman, M. (1962/1982).Capitalism and Freedman, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.Am. J. Sociol. 91: 481–510.
Hirschman, A. O. (1984). Against parsimony: Three easy ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse.Bull. Arts Sci. 37(8): 11–28.
International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences (1968). Macmillan, New York.
Janowitz, M.The Reconstruction of Patriotism: Education for Civic Consciousness, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kelley, H. H., and Thibaut, J. W. (1978).Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence, Wiley, New York.
Lasch, C. (1984)The Minimal Self, W. W. Norton, New York.
Mead, L. (1986).Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship, Free Press, New York.
Morgan, R. E. (1984).Disabling America, Basic Books, New York.
Mueller, D. C. (1979).Public Choice, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Newman, M. and Berkowitz, B. (1971).How to be Your Own Best Friend, Random House, New York.
North, D. C. (1981).Structure and Change in Economic History W. W. Norton, New York.
Nozick, R. (1974).Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Basic Books, New York.
Sandel, M. (1984). Morality and the Liberal Ideal.The New Republic, May 7, pp. 15–17.
Von Hayek, F. (1945).The Road to Serfdom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Von Hayek, F. (1960).The Constitution of Liberty, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Walzer, M. (1980).Radical Principles, Basic Books, New York.
Williamson, O. E. (1975).Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Free Press, New York.
Wrong, D. (1961). Oversocialized concept of man in sociology.Am. Sociol. Rev. 26: 183–193.
Yankelovich, D. (1981).New Rules: Searching for Self-Fulfillment in a World Turned Upside Down, Random House, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Etzioni, A. I & We: The case for the Responsive Community. Soc Just Res 2, 81–94 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048500
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048500