Skip to main content
Log in

Justice in old age: An analysis of corporatist social theory

  • Justice And Intergenerational Relations
  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is sometimes argued that a tacit contract exists between the generations in industrial society that requires that the present structure of Social Security benefits not be altered in any way that would serve to diminish the present benefit levels. The demands of social justice, it is thought, require that Western societies maintain their commitments to Social Security programs, especially to those programs of the type administered in the United States. This paper examines questions of justice pertaining to the aged in contemporary society. It is argued here that the demands of justice pertain not only to the satisfaction of basic needs for subsistence but also to the satisfaction of the need for self-realization. The commitment of capitalist nations like the U.S. to social justice for the aged is analyzed using a theory of justice that is based on Durkheim's political writings on corporatism and the “solidarist” theory of the Catholic social movement. The corporatist theory of justice would require that public pension systems like Social Security be revised to provide more adequately for the social needs of the working-class aged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, A. (1945), The reception of Leo XIII's labor encyclical in American, 1891–1919.Rev. Polit. 7: 464–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, E. (1953). Church and society in Germany: Social and political movements and ideas in German and Austrian Catholicism, 1789–1950. In Moody, J. N. (ed.),Church Church and Society: Catholic Social and Political Thought and Movements, 1789–1950 Arts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, G. (1982).The Priority of Labor: A Commentary on Laborem Exercens Paulist Press, New York:

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum G. (1984). Class struggle and the magisterium: A new noteTheol. Stud. 45: 690–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binstock, R.H. (1984). Reframing the agenda of policies on aging in Minkler, M. and Estes, C. L. (eds.)Readings in the Political Economy of Aging Baywood, Farmingdale, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, A. (1984).Guilds and Civil Society in European Political Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present Cornell University Press. Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, R. H. (1947). German Theories of the Corporative State, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brose, E. D. (1985).Christian Labor and the Politics of Frustration in Imperial Germany Catholic University, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvez, J., and Perrin, J. (1961).The Church and Social Justice Burns & Cates, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (1985). Economic status of the aging. In Binstock, R. and Shanas, E. (eds.),Handbook of Aging and the Social Science Van Nostrand Rinehold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A. (1981). Freedom, justice, and capitalismNew Left Rev. 126: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, F. L. and Kramek, L. (1986). Measuring economic hardship among older Americans.Gerontologist 26: 38–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (1983). Pluralism and the new corporatism.Polit. Stud. 31: 452–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, S., Van der Gaage, J., Smolensky, E., and Taussig, M. (1984). Income transfers and the economic status of the elderly. In Moon, M. (ed.),Economic Transfers in the United States University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., and Van der Oever, P. (1981). Age relations and public policy in advanced industrial societies.Population Devel. Rev. 7: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamant, A. (1960).Austrian Catholics and the First Republic Princeton University Press, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1957).Professional Ethics and Civil Morals Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1985a).Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1985b). Weakness of will and the free-rider problem. Econo. Philos. 1: 231–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galston, W. (1980).Justice and the Human Good University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galston, W. (1986). Equality of opportunity and liberal theory. In Lucash, F. (ed.).Justice and Equality, Here and Now Cornell, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gane, M. (1984). Institutional socialism and the sociological critique of communism: Introduction to Durkheim and Mauss.Econ. Soc. 13: 304–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. G. (1984).Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1973). The importance of something for nothing. InFor Sociology Allen Lane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, S. (1986). Surge in prematurely jobless.New York Times Oct. 13, BL ff.

  • Hearn, F. (1985). Durkheim's political sociology: Corporatism, state autonomy, and democracy.Soc. Res. 52: 151–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1974).Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingson, E. R., Hirshorn, B. A., and Cornman, J. M. (1986).Ties That Bind: The Interdependence of Generations Seven Locks, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, C. (1983).Corporate State Ideologies University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. N. (1971).On Individuality and Social Forms University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J. R. (1980).On Justice Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1977).Essays in Social Theory Columbia University Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles, J. (1984).Old Age in the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Public Pensions Little Brown, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, C. (1963).The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitigliani, F. (1934).The Italian Corporative State Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plamenatz, J. (1975).Karl Marx's Philosophy of Man Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadagno, J. (1984). Welfare capitalism and the Social Security Act of 1935. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49: 632–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocco, A. (1973). The formation and functions of the corporations. In Lyttleton, A. (ed.),Italian Fascisms Caper, London. (Originally published, 1934)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald, R. A. (1985). Does liberalism rest on a mistake?Can. J. Philos. 15: 231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. A. (1906).A Living Wage Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. A. (1926a). Fascism in practice.Commonweal November 24, pp. 31–36.

  • Ryan, J. A. (1926b). The Doctrine of fascism.Commonweal November 17, pp. 18–25.

  • Ryan, J. A. (1936).A Better Economic Order Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E. E. (1986). Justice ideology and social legitimation. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen R. L. and Greenberg J. (eds.),Justice in Social Relations Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the century of corporatism?Rev. Polit. 36: 85–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (1983).Liberalism and the Origins of European Social Theory University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, K. (1981).On Human Needs Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasson, R. F. (1984). Government old age pensions under affluence and austerity: West Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, and the United States.Res. Soc. Prob. Public Policy 3: 217–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlastos, G. (1962). Justice and equality. In Brandt, R. B. (ed.),Social Justice Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., and Walster, G. W. (1975). Equity and social justice.J. Soc. Issues 3: 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, H. L. (1976).The “New Corporatism,” Centralization, and the Welfare State. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, H. L. (1981). Leftism, Catholicism, and democratic corporatism: The role of political parties in recent welfare state development. In Flora P., and Heidenheimer, A. J. (eds.)The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, H. L., Luebert, G. M. Hahn, S. R., and Jamieson, A. M. (1985).Comparative Social Policy University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P. J. (1985).Varieties of Corporatism Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dowd, J.J. Justice in old age: An analysis of corporatist social theory. Soc Just Res 1, 477–499 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048389

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048389

Key words

Navigation