Skip to main content

The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior

Abstract

To investigate the relationship between fairness and organizational outcomes, the present study examined the survey responses of government employees at six Federal installations. Indices of procedural and distributive fairness were factor-analytically derived. Multiple regression analyses indicated that both the procedural measures and the distributive measures were significantly related to measures of job satisfaction, evaluation of supervisor, conflict/harmony, trust in management, and turnover intention. Procedural fairness accounted for significantly more variance than distributive fairness in each of these criterion measures, except for turnover intention. These findings are related to conceptual and methodological issues concerning procedural fairness and organizational behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity.J. Abnor. Soc. Psychol. 67: 422–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S., and Russ, T. L. (1985).Procedural and distributive justice effects: The role of social context. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

  • Blau, P. (1964).Exchange and Power in Social Life John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, R. J. (1983). Participation and pay.Group Organi. Stud. 8: 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., Jr., and Klesh, J. R. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In Seashore, S. E., Lawler, E. E., III, Mirvis, P., and Cammann, C. (eds.),Assessing Organizational Change, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 71–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, M. R. (1978). A longitudinal field assessment of employee perceptions of equitable treatment.Organ. Behav. Hum. Perf. 21: 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coch, L., and French, J. R. P. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change.Hum. Rel. 1: 512–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1975).Applied Multiple Regression: Correlation Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 16: 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice?J. Soc. Issues 31: 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1977). Recurrent themes in the study of social conflict.J. Soc. Issues 33: 222–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich, J. E., and Carrell, M. R. (1976). Dimensions of organizational fairness as predictors of job satisfaction, absence, and turnover.Proc. Acad. Manag., 79–83.

  • Dittrich, J. E., and Carrell, M. R. (1979). Organizational equity perceptions, employee job satisfaction, and departmental absence and turnover rates.Organ. Behav. Hum. Perf. 24: 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, J. W. (1978). Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction.Acad. Manag. J. 21: 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, R. H., and Lee, S. M. (1972). Salary equity: Its determinants, analysis, and correlates.J. Appl. Psychol. 56: 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35: 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., and Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37: 2253–2261.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P., Jr., Caplan, R. D., and Harrison, R. V. (1982).The Mechanisms of Job Stress and Strain, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. S. (1974). An examination of referents used in the evaluation of pay.Org. Behav. Hum. Perf. 12: 170–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. S., and Friedman, A. (1971). An examination of Adams' theory of inequity.Adm. Sci. Quart. 16: 271–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 389–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations.J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 340–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., and Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Paulus, P. B. (eds),Basic Group Processes Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 235–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. G. (1961).Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms Harcourt, Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F. J., Barnes, J. L., and Murphy, K. R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation.J. Appl. Psychol. 63: 751–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F. J., Barnes-Farrell, J. & Cleveland, J. N. (1980). Perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation: A follow-up.J. Appl. Psychol. 65: 355–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaTour, S., Houlden, P., Walker, L., and Thibaut, J. W. (1976). Procedure: Transnational perspectives and preferences.Yale Law J. 86: 258–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., III. (1968). Equity theory as a predictor of productivity and work quality.Psychol. Bull. 70: 596–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., III. (1971).Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., III. (1977). Reward systems. In Hackman, J. R., and Suttle, J. L. (eds.),Improving life at work: Behavioral science approaches to organizational change Goodyear Publishing Co., Santa Monica, CA, pp. 163–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In Thibaut, J., Spence, J. T., and Carson, R. T. (eds.),Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ, pp. 211–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S., and Willis, R. H. (eds.),Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research Plenum Press, New York, pp. 27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., Kurtz, S., Musante, L., Walker, L., and Thibaut, J. W. (1980). Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interest.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39: 643–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., and Hohenfeld, J. A. (1979). Longitudinal assessment of equity effects on the performance of major league baseball players.J. Appl. Psychol. 64: 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., and Miller, H. E. (1979). The effect of significant other's job complexity on employee reactions to work.Hum. Rel. 32: 247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1978). The intentional distortion of information in organizational communications: a laboratory and field investigation.Hum. Rel. 31: 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Reilly, C. A., III, and Roberts, K. H. (1976). Credibility and communication in work units.J. Appl. Psychol. 61: 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R. A. (1969). Equity theory: A review and critique.Organ. Behav. Hum. Perf. 4: 176–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. (1977).Effectiveness in Work Roles: Employee Responses to Work Environments, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzwald, J., and Goldenberg, J. (1979). Compliance and assistance to an authority figure in perceived equitable or nonequitable situations.Hum. Rel. 32: 877–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telly, C. S., French, W. L., and Scott, W. G. (1971). The relationship of inequity to turnover among hourly workers.Admin. Sci. Quart. 16: 164–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., and Kelley, H. H. (1959).The Social Psychology of Groups John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., and Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., and Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure.Calif. Law Rev. 66: 541–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., and Caine, A. (1981). The role of distributional and procedural fairness in the endorsement of formal leaders.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 41: 642–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L., Lind, E. A., and Thibaut, J. W. (1979). The relation between procedural and distributive justice.Va. Law rev. 65: 1401–1420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., and Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 25: 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1966). The concept of equity in the perception of pay.Admin. Sci. Quart. 2: 414–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., and Nesset, B. (1968). Preferences among forms of equity.Organ. Behav. Hum. Perf. 3: 400–416.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexander, S., Ruderman, M. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Soc Just Res 1, 177–198 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048015

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048015

Key words

  • procedural justice
  • organizational behavior
  • social psychology