Public Choice

, Volume 77, Issue 4, pp 725–738 | Cite as

Distributive politics, ward representation, and the spread of zoning

  • James Clingermayer


This analysis examines two alternative explanations for the adoption of comprehensive zoning ordinances in the years immediately following its initial adoption in New York City. The market failure explanation predicts zoning adoption in cities where externality problems (represented by heavy incidence of manufacturing) exist. The distributive policymaking model treats zoning as a form of regulation that is most likely to be found in cities where local legislators are elected from geographically-concentrated constituencies (e.g., wards) and therefore try to target policy benefits to their own constituencies while spreading the policy costs over all constituencies. Some support is found for each model. Especially striking is the interactive effect of ward representation and of economic interest (i.e., levels of home ownership).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Advisory Committee on City Planning and Zoning. U.S. Commerce Department. (1931). The preparation of zoning ordinances. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  2. Bassett, E.M. (1936). Zoning: The laws, administration, and court decisions during the first twenty years. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Barzel, Y. (1982). Measurement cost and the organization of markets,Journal of Law and Economics 25 (April): 27–48.Google Scholar
  4. Commerce Department, Bureau of the Census, United States. (1930).Fifteenth census of the United States. Vol. VI. Population. Washington: GPO.Google Scholar
  5. Commerce Department, Bureau of the Census, United States. (1932).Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
  6. Delafons, J. (1969).Land use controls in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Denzau, A.T. and Weingast, B.R. (1982). The political economy of land use regulation.Urban Law Annual 23: 385–405.Google Scholar
  8. Ellickson, R.C. (1973). Alternatives to zoning: Covenants, nuisance rules, and fines as land use controls.University of Chicago Law Review 40.4 (Summer): 681–781.Google Scholar
  9. Ferejohn, J.A. (1974).Pork barrel politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fischel, W. (1989).Do growth controls matter? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gordon, D.N. (1968). Immigrants and urban governmental form in American cities, 1933–1960.American Journal of Sociology 74 (September): 158–171.Google Scholar
  12. Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study.American Political Science Review 67.4 (December): 1174–1185.Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton, B. (1975). Zoning and property taxation in a system of local governments.Urban Studies 12: 205–211.Google Scholar
  14. Handlin, O. (1951).The uprooted. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, K. and Hurley, P. (1988). Uniform state law adoptions in the American states: An exploratory analysis.Publius 18.1 (Winter): 117–126.Google Scholar
  16. Hays, S.P. (1964). The politics of reform in municipal government in the progressive era.Pacific Northwest Quarterly 55: 157–169.Google Scholar
  17. Hinds, D. and Ordway, N. (1986). The influence of race on rezoning decisions: Equality of treatment in black and white census tracts, 1955–1980.The Review of Black Political Economy (Spring): 51–63.Google Scholar
  18. International City Managers Association. (1934).The municipal yearbook 1934. Chicago: ICMA.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, A. (1976).A place called home: A history of low-cost housing in Manhattan. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Knauss, N.L. (1929). 768 municipalities in United States now protected by zoning ordinance.The American City 40.6 (June): 167, 169, 171.Google Scholar
  21. Knoke, D. (1982). The spread of municipal reform: Temporal, spatial, and social dynamics.American Journal of Sociology 87.6 (May): 1314–1139.Google Scholar
  22. Krueckeberg, D.A. (ed.) (1983).Introduction to planning history in the United States. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Makielski, S. (1966).The politics of zoning. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Maser, S.M. (1985). Demographic factors affecting constitutional decisions: The case of municipal charters.Public Choice 47: 121–162.Google Scholar
  25. Maser, S.M., Riker, W.H. and Rosett, Richard N. (1977). The effects of zoning and externalities on the price of land: An empirical analysis of Monroe County, New York.Journal of Law and Economics 20.1 (April): 112–132.Google Scholar
  26. Mayhew, D.R. (1974).Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Philpott, T. (1978).The slum and the ghetto. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Schiesl, M. (1977).The politics of efficiency: Municipal administration and reform in America, 1880–1920. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Siegan, B. (1972).Land use without zoning. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  30. Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local public expenditure.Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424.Google Scholar
  31. Toll, S.I. (1969).Zoned American. New York: Grossman Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Walker, J. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states.American Political Science Review 63 (September): 880–899.Google Scholar
  33. Weiss, M.A. (1987).The rise of the community builders: The American real estate industry and urban land planning. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, J.Q. and E. Banfield. (1964). Public-regardingness as a value premise in voting behavior.American Political Science Review 58 (December): 876–887.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Clingermayer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceTexas A&M UniversityCollege Station

Personalised recommendations