Skip to main content
Log in

Does rain help the Republicans? Theory and evidence on turnout and the vote

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional political wisdom holds that inclement weather on election day reduces turnout, and helps elect Republican candidates. Analysis of National Climatic Data Center weather records and National Election Studies (NES) survey data for 1984, 1986, and 1988 refutes the latter hypothesis: interaction variables based on various measures of partisanship and election-day rainfall show no evidence of partisan differences in the turnout-deterring impact of inclement weather. Furthermore, rainfall does not significantly reduce the probability of voting for the NES samples as a whole, but only among those respondents scoring low on the standard NES civic duty indicator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, P.R. and Aldrich, J.H. (1982). The decline of electoral participation in America.American Political Science Review 76: 502–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1970).Sociologists, economists, and democracy. London: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S. (1979). The problematic rationality of political participation. In P. Laslett and J. Fishkin (Eds.)Philosophy, politics, and society. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R.W. (1986). Election calendars and voter turnout.American Politics Quarterly 14: 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, G.A. and Patterson, S.C. (1982). Contextual influences on participation in U.S. state legislative elections.Legislative Studies Quarterly 7: 359–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1960). Surge and decline: A study of electoral change.Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 397–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebula, R.J. and Murphy, D.R. (1980). The Electoral College and voter participation rates: An explanatory note.Public Choice 35: 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M.M. (1981). Political participation in midterm congressional elections: Attitudinal and social characteristics during the 1970s.American Politics Quarterly 9: 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of State Governments (1984–90).The book of the states (Vols. 25–28). Council of State Governments, Lexington, Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNardo, J. (1980). Turnout and the vote: The joke's on the Democrats.American Political Science Review 74: 406–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNardo, J. (1986). Does heavy turnout help Democrats in presidential elections? (reply to Tucker and Vedlitz)American Political Science Review 80: 1298–1304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durden, G.C. and Gaynor, P. (1987). The rational behavior theory of voter participation: Evidence from the 1970 and 1982 elections.Public Choice 53: 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R.S. (1981). Why do people vote? Because they are registered.American Politics Quarterly 9: 259–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, A.T. (1978).The empty polling booth. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, R.W. (1987). Political institutions and voter turnout in the industrial democracies.American Political Science Review 81: 405–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. (1993). The voter participation effects of selecting jurors from registration lists.Journal of Law and Economics (forthcoming).

  • Knack, S. (1992). Civic norms, social sanctions, and voter turnout.Rationality and Society 4(2): 133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard, J.O. (1981). The paradox of voting and candidate competition: A general equilibrium analysis. In G. Horwich and J.P. Quirk (Eds.),Essays in contemporary fields of economics. West Lafayette, In: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard, J.O. (1984). The pure theory of large two-candidate elections.Public Choice 44: 7–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaluso, T.F. and Wanat, J. (1979). Voting turnout and religiosity.Polity 12: 158–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W.E. and Traugott, S. (1989).American national election studies data sourcebook, 1952–1986. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, R.M. (1991). Groups in rational turnout models.American Journal of Political Science 35: 758–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA/National Climatic Data Center.Hourly precipitation data Nov. 1990, Nov. 1988, Nov. 1986, Nov. 1984. Asheville, NC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA/National Climatic Data Center.Local climatological data, monthly summaries Nov. 1988, Nov. 1986, Nov. 1984. Ashville, NC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, T. and Rosenthal, H. (1983). A strategic calculus of voting.Public Choice 41: 7–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliff, B. and Pudaite, P. (1991, August). The majority party and turnout: A critique and reinterpretation. Mimeo. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Political Science Association annual meeting in Washington, DC.

  • Reiter, H.L. (1979). Why is turnout down?Public Opinion Quarterly 43: 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. and Ordeshook, P. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting.American Political Science Review 62: 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strate, J.M. et al. (1989). Life span civic development and voting participation.American Political Science Review 83: 443–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, R. (1987).Why Americans don't vote: Turnout decline in the United States, 1960–1984. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, H.J. and Vedlitz, A. (1986). Does heavy turnout help Democrats in presidential elections?American Political Science Review 80: 1291–1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1986).Voting and registration in the election of November 1984. Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 405. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, H.F. and Grofman, B. (1981). Candidate evaluations and turnout.American Politics Quarterly 9: 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R.E. and Rosenstone, S.J. (1980).Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author wishes to thank Joseph V. Knack (National Weather Service, ret.), William Evans, and Tancred Lidderdale for helpful comments and suggestions. American National Election Studies data were collected by the Center for Political Studies of the University of Michigan and were provided by the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. Precipitation and temperature data were collected by the National Weather Service, and provided by the National Climatic Data Center. Analyses and interpretation of the data, as well as any remaining errors, are the sole responsibility of the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knack, S. Does rain help the Republicans? Theory and evidence on turnout and the vote. Public Choice 79, 187–209 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047926

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047926

Keywords

Navigation