Skip to main content
Log in

Empirical tests of the Samuelsonian publicness parameter: Has the right hypothesis been tested?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bergstrom, R. and Goodman, R. (1973). Private demands for public goods.American Economic Review 63 (June): 280–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blecha, B. (1987). The crowding parameter and Samuelsonian publicness.Journal of Political Economy 95 (April): 622–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, T. and Deacon, R. (1972). The demand for the services of non-federal governments.American Economic Review 62 (December): 891–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A. and Mackay, R. (1976). Benefit shares and majority voting.American Economic Review 66 (March): 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (1990). Congestion function specification and the publicness of local public goods.Journal of Urban Economics 27: 80–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (1986). A note on the publicness of local goods: Evidence from New York State municipalities.Canadian Journal of Economics 19(3): 568–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R. and Means, T. (1991). Benefit shares, the crowding parameter and Samuelsonian publicness.Southern Economic Journal 58 (October): 518–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R. and Mehay, S. (1985). Bureaucracy and the divisibility of local public output.Public Choice 45: 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramlich, E. and Rubinfeld, D. (1982). Micro estimates of public spending demand functions and tests of the Tiebout and median voter hypotheses.Journal of Political Economy 90 (June): 536–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R. (1978). Testing political economy's ‘as if’ proposition: Is the median income voter really decisive?Public Choice 33: 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E. (1979). Specification searches: Ad hoc inference with nonexperimental data. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, M., Wilson, W. and Arthur, L. (1981). The publicness of local public goods: Evidence from Ontario municipalities.Canadian Journal of Economics 14 (4): 596–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. (1988). On the measurement of congestion in the provision of local public goods.Journal of Urban Economics 24: 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pack, H. and Pack, J. (1978). Metropolitan fragmentation and local public expenditures.National Tax Journal 31 (4): 349–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W. (1978). Institutional approaches to public expenditure: Empirical evidence from Swiss municipalities.Journal of Public Economics 9: 255–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W. and Frey, B. (1976). Two approaches to estimating public expenditures.Public Finance Quarterly 4 (4): 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhorn, C. (1979). Market interaction between public and private goods: The demand for fire protection.National Tax Journal 32 (1): 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonzalez, R.A., Means, T.S. & Mehay, S.L. Empirical tests of the Samuelsonian publicness parameter: Has the right hypothesis been tested?. Public Choice 77, 523–534 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047858

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047858

Keywords

Navigation