Skip to main content
Log in

Tax authority to the European Parliament?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we analyze whether countries of the EC community should plead for a decentralized system to finance the European funds rather than using a uniform tax imposed by the European parliament. The analysis is within a multistage game-theoretic framework in which the implication of the financing system of a confederation on the investment behavior in the respective states is considered. The paper is in the tradition of the literature which claims that from a view of global efficiency property-rights structures inducing ex-post efficient allocations may be worse than a system leading to an ex-post inefficient allocation. For this specific economic issue we elucidate the tradeoff between incentive effect and distributional policy. Especially we demonstrate that rather homogeneous countries benefit by installing a central tax institution. If the countries are rather heterogeneous, the countries may have opposing interests with respect to the answer of the question which is presented in the title. It is possible that the “high-developed” country prefers to install a central tax authority while the “low-developed” country does not. However, in general the reverse ordering which is more in line with our intuition results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergstrom, T.C., Blume, L. and Varian, H.R. (1986). On the Private Provision of Public Goods,Journal of Public Economics 29, 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., Pestieau, P. and Wildasin, D. (1989). Tax Transfer Policies and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods,Journal of Public Economics 39, 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, C.D. (1992). The Uniqueness of Nash Equilibrium in the Private Provision of Public Goods,Journal of Public Economics 49, 389–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1986).Game Theory with Application to Economics, Oxford.

  • Ihori, T. (1992). Impure Public Goods and Transfers in a Three-Agent Model,Journal of Public Economics 48, 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nett, L. and Peters, W. (1993a). The Uniqueness of the Subscription Equilibrium with Endogenous Labor Supply,Economics Letters 41, 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nett, L. and Peters, W. (1993b). Voluntary Provision of Public Goods — Some Counterintuitive Results, Discussion Paper A-406, University of Bonn.

  • Schneider, F. (1992). The Federal and Fiscal Structures of Representative and Direct Democracies as Models for a European Federal Union? Mimeo, University of Linz.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nett, L. Tax authority to the European Parliament?. Public Choice 82, 341–357 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047701

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047701

Keywords

Navigation