Skip to main content
Log in

Broadcasting system in Italy: Evolution and perspectives

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Italian public broadcasting service (RAI) has had a monopoly until the middle of the 1970s. The peculiarity of public monopoly in broadcasting is its tendency to secure political rather than economic rents. The dangers that public monopoly causes to consumers (viewers-listeners), has not emerged at least until the mid-seventies for the simple reason that broadcasting has been conceived under the ideological umbrella of public good rather than in terms of opportunity costs.

A law limiting monopoly has taken fourteen years to be passed so that the proliferation of private radio and television stations has orgininated the subrogatory intervention by the Constitutional Court. From 1975 to 1989 regulation has tended to perpetuate RAI's monopoly, in a context which was very different from the one in which the RAI was established. It is no wonder, therefore, that reforms have been motivated by RAI's financial crisis in the seventies and eighties, and not by political choices.

The 1990 law puts a stop to public monopoly in broadcasting giving rise to what now appears to be a duopoly, but which in 1990 to many seemed to introduce a contestable market able to respond to both consumers' demand and technological innovations more efficiently, so ensuring more freedom of information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barberio, R. and Macchitella, C. (1989).L'Europa delle televisioni. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besen, S.M., Krattenmaker, T.G., Metzger, A.R. Jr. and Woodbury, J.R. (1984).Misregulating television. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J.G., Nossiter, T.J. (Eds.). (1991).Broadcasting finance in transition: A comparative handbook. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassese, S. (1991).Le basi del diritto amministrativo. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelli, E. (1988). La TV tra satelliti e Alta definizione. In G. Giovannini (Ed.),Mass media anni 90. Torino: Gutenberg 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayrol, R. (1991).Problems of structure, finance and program quality in the French audio-visual system. In J.G. Blumler and T.J. Nossiter (Eds.),Broadcasting finance in transition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einaudi, L. (1949).Lezioni di politica sociale. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eusepi, G. (1989). Review to: F. Forte,Il controllo del potere economico. Milano: Sugarco. InRivista di Politica Economica, Anno LXXX (Serie III, marzo 1990, Fascicolo III): 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guala F. and Chiarenza, F. (1978).Il cavallo morente. Milano: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, G. (1991). Broadcasting in Italy. In J.G. Blumler and T.J. Nossiter (Eds.),Broadcasting finance in transition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (1991). Broadcasting structure and finance: The Netherlands. In J.G. Blumler and T.J. Nossiter (Eds.),Broadcasting finance in transition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, G.E. and Lakatos, L.A. (1992). The optimal rate of privatization in a dynamic economy. In P. Pestieau (Ed.),Public finance in a world transition. Public Finance, Vol. 47.

  • Nielsen auditing service for advertisement. (Various issues).

  • Nossiter, T.J. (1991). British television: A mixed economy. In J.G. Blumler and T.J. Nossiter (Eds.),Broadcasting finance in transition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, K. (1991). Television in Sweden 1986: Position and prospects. In J.G. Blumler and T.J. Nossiter (Eds.),Broadcasting finance in transition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974).Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B.M. and Wildman, S.S. (1992).Video economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A. (1986). (Chairman).Report of the committee on financing the BBC. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reith, J. (1949)Into the wind. London: Hodder and Stonghton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, H. (1985). A European view of competition and control in a multimedia society. In E.M. Noam (Ed.),Video media competition: Regulation, economics, and technology. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W. (1991). Public-service broadcasting in the Federal Republic of Germany. In J.G. Blumler and T.J. Nossiter (Eds.),Broadcasting finance in transition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veljanovski, C. (Ed.) (1989).Freedom in broadcasting. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J. and Yarrow, G. (1988).Privatization: An economic analysis. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the European Public Choice Society Meeting, Beaune (France), 3–6 April 1991. I am grateful to Michele Grillo for helpful comments given as discussant at the meeting and to Eugenio Cerioni for his suggestions. CNR financial support is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eusepi, G. Broadcasting system in Italy: Evolution and perspectives. Public Choice 82, 307–324 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047699

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047699

Keywords

Navigation