Skip to main content
Log in

Vouchers and voting: An initial estimate based on the median voter model

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the major concerns associated with school voucher proposals is that they will only benefit those who leave public schools in favor of private schools. The children left behind in public schools are expected to necessarily be made worse off by such policies. This paper provides evidence suggesting that children left behind in public schools will also benefit. The available evidence suggests that, after a voucher plan, voter support for public schools will rise enough to increase the human capital of public school students, despite the presence of negative peer group effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Card, D. and Krueger, A. (1992). Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States.Journal of Political Economy 100 (1): 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J. and Moe, T. (1990).Politics, markets, and American schools. Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. and Hoffer, T. (1987).Public and private high schools. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. and Achilles, C. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: A statewide experiment.American Educational Research Journal 27 (Fall): 557–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, M.R. (1988). Tuition tax credits and the public schools.National Tax Journal 41: 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. (1983).Tuition tax credits for private education. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D. (1991). Demand and supply elasticities for private education: A rejoinder.Public Finance Quarterly 19 (July): 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962).Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. (1983). An estimation of U.S. family wealth and its distribution from microdata, 1973.Review of Income and Wealth, Series 29, No. 1 (March): 23–44.

  • Hanushek, E.A. (1986). The economics of schooling.Journal of Economic Literature 24 (September): 1141–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R.P. (1978). Testing political economy's “as if” proposition: Is the median voter really decisive?Public Choice 33: 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, N. (1990). The mix of social and private provision of goods and services.Journal of Public Economics 43 (November): 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, E. and Sjoblom, K. (1986). Education and the national wealth of the United States.Review of Income and Wealth, Series 32, No. 1 (March): 87–106.

  • Lankford, H. and Wyckoff, J. (1992). Primary and secondary school choice among public and religious alternatives.Economics of Education Review 11: 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H.M. (1992). The economics of educational choice.Economics of Education Review 10 (2): 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. (1989).Privatization and educational choice. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R. (1987). Why is education publicly provided? A critical survey.Cato Journal 72 (Fall): 475–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinello, F. and West, E.G. (1991). Education budget reductions via tax credits: Some further considerations.Public Finance Quarterly 19 (July): 355–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R.H. and Wise, D.A. (1982). High school preparation and early labor force experience. In R.B. Freemand and D. Wise,The youth labor market problem: Its nature, causes, and consequences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R.J. (1986). Comparisons of private and public schools: The critical role of regulations. In D.C. Levy (Ed.),Private education: Studies in choice and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (1991).Private schools in the United States: A statistical profile, with comparisons to public schools. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, B., Zaharias, J.B., DeWayne Fulton, B., Achilles, C.M. and Hooper, R. (1991). The lasting benefits study. Tennessee: Center of Excellence for Research in Basic Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangazas, P. (1991). Vouchers in a dynamic model of a “poor” community. Working Paper.

  • Rangazas, P. (1992a). On assessing voucher plans: With special attention to peer group effects. Working Paper.

  • Rangazas, P. (1992b). Teacher unions, competition, and school vouchers. Working Paper.

  • Rangazas, P. (1992c). Vouchers in a community choice model with zoning. Working Paper.

  • Romer, T., Rosenthal, H. and Munley, V. (1992). Economic incentives and political institutions: Spending and voting in school budget referenda.Journal of Public Economics 49: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A.B. (1992). Private school enrollment in metropolitan areas.Public Finance Quarterly 20 (July): 298–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonstelie, J. (1982). The welfare cost of free public schools.Journal of Political Economy 90 (4) (August): 794–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, A.A. and Wolfe, B.L. (1977). Do schools make a difference?American Economic Review 67 (September): 639–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Word, E.J., Pate Bain, H., Dewayne Fulton, B., Zaharias, J.B., Achilles, C., Lintz, M.N., Folger, J. and Breda, C. (1991). Students/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR): Tennessee's K-3 class size study. Final Summary Report, 1985–1990, Nashville, TN: Tennessee State Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, J.F. (1992). Private school versus public school achievement: Are there findings that should affect the educational choice debate.Economics of Education Review 11: 371–394.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper has benefited from the comments of Ed Buffie, James Heckman, Tom Philipson, Bob Sandy, and the participants at the IUPUI seminar, the Microeconomics Workshop at Indiana University, and the Public Policy Workshop at the University of Chicago. I would also like to thank Sharon Zehr Rangazas for her assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rangazas, P. Vouchers and voting: An initial estimate based on the median voter model. Public Choice 82, 261–279 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047697

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047697

Keywords

Navigation