Skip to main content
Log in

The relative efficiency of stock versus mutual S&Ls: A stochastic cost frontier approach

  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From an agency theory perspective, recent conversion activity of savings and loan associations (S&Ls) from mutual to stock organizations should improve the overall performance of the thrift industry. We employ a two-step approach to examine this issue using a sample of 559 S&Ls in the Atlanta Federal Home Loan Bank District in 1988. In the first step, we estimate inefficiency scores for individual S&Ls using a stochastic cost frontier methodology. In a second step Tobit model we use these inefficiency scores to examine the relationship between firm inefficiency and organizational form. We find three important results: (1) that the mutual and stock S&Ls in our sample have similar cost structures, allowing the pooling of S&L data; (2) that S&Ls have a wide range of inefficiency scores, with a mean score of 16 percent indicating that the average S&L could produce its output with only 84 percent of the inputs actually used; and (3) that operating inefficiency was not significantly related to form of ownership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner, D.J., Lovell, C.A., and Schmidt, P. “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.Journal of Econometrics 6 (July 1977), 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akella, S.R., and Greenbaum, S.I. “Saving and Loan Ownership Structure and Expense-Preference.’Journal of Banking and Finance 12, (September 1988), 419–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A., and Demsetz, H. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.”American Economic Review 62 (December 1972), 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L., and Cebenoyan, A.S. “Bank Acquisitions and Ownership Structure: Theory and Evidence.”Journal of Banking and Finance 15 (April 1991), 425–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aly, H.Y., Grabowski, R., Pasurka, C., and Rangan, N. “Technical, Scale, and Allocative Efficiencies in U.S. Banking: An Empirical Investigation.”Review of Economics and Statistics 72 (May 1990), 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. “Regression Analysis When the Dependent Variable is Truncated Normal.”Econometrica 41 (November 1973), 997–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amihud, Y., and Lev, B. “Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers.”Bell Journal of Economics 12 (Autumn 1981), 605–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awh, R.Y., and Primeaux, W.J., Jr. “Managerial Discretion and Expense Preference Behavior.”Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (May 1985), 224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, G.J. “Savings Banks and the Public Interest.”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 4, Part II, (1972), 133–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, G.J.On Analysis of the Causes of Savings and Loan Association Failures. Salomon Brothers Center for the Study of Financial Institutions Monograph Series (1985-4/5), Graduate School of Business, New York University, 1985.

  • Berger, A.N., and Hannan, T.H. “The Price-Concentration Relationship in Banking.”Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (May 1989), 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N., and Humphrey, D.B. “The Dominance of Inefficiencies Over Scale and Product Mix Economies in Banking.”Journal of Monetary Economics (August 1991), 117–148.

  • Blair, D.W., and Placone, D.L. “Expense Preference Behavior, Agency Costs, and Firm Organization: The Savings and Loan Industry.”Journal of Economics and Business 40 (February 1988), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebenoyan, A.S., Cooperman, E.S., and Register, C.A. “Firm Efficiency and the Regulatory Closure of S&Ls: An Empirical Investigation.”Review of Economics and Statistics (1993), forthcoming.

  • Demsetz, H. “The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm.”Journal of Law and Economics 26 (June 1983), 375–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, F.R. “Managerial Objectives in Regulated Industries: Expense Preference Behavior in Banking.”Journal of Political Economy 85 (February 1977), 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elyasiani, E., and Mehdian, S.H. “A Nonparametric Approach to Measurement of Efficiency and Technological Change: The Case of Large U.S. Commercial Banks.”Journal of Financial Services Research 4 (July 1990), 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., and Jensen, M.C. “Agency Problems and Residual Claims.”Journal of Law and Economics 26 (1983), 327–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, G.D., and Lovell, C.A.K. “Measuring Cost Efficiency in Banking: Econometric and Linear Programming Evidence.”Journal of Econometrics 46 (October/November 1990), 229–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filimon, R. “Stock Institutions Outcapitalize Mutuals.”Office of Thrift Supervision Journal (March 1990), 20–22.

  • Hannan, T.H. “Expense Preference Behavior in Banking: A Reexamination.”Journal of Political Economy 87 (August 1979), 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, T.H. “Bank Commercial Loan Markets and the Role of Market Structure: Evidence from Surveys of Commercial Lending.”Journal of Banking and Finance 15 (February 1991a), 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, T.H. “Foundations of the Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm in Banking.”Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 23 (February 1991b), 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, T.H., and Mavinga, F. “Expense Preference and Managerial Control: The Case of the Banking Firm.”Bell Journal of Economics 11 (Autumn 1980), 671–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W.H. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.”Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October 1976), 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow, J., Lovell, C.A.K., Materov, I.S., and Schmidt, P. “On Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model.”Journal of Econometrics 19 (July 1982), 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G.G., Griffiths, W.E., Hill, R.C., Lutkephol, H., and Lee, T.The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, R.L., and Smith S.D. “Changes in the Cost of Intermediation: The Case of Savings and Loans.”Journal of Finance 45 (September 1990), 1337–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masulis, R.W. “Changes in Ownership Structure: Conversions of Mutual Savings and Loans to Stock Charter.”Journal of Financial Economics 18 (March 1987), 29–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J.F., and Moffitt, R.A. “The Uses of Tobit Analysis.”Review of Economics and Statistics 62 (May 1980), 318–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W., and Broeck, J. “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Function with Composed Error.”International Economic Review 18 (June 1977), 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L.J. “A Multiproduct Cost Study of Savings and Loans.”Journal of Finance 42 (June 1987), 423–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L.J. “Testing for Expense Preference Behavior: Mutual versus Stock Savings and Loans.”Rand Journal of Economics 20 (Winter 1989), 483–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L.J. “Agency Costs Among Savings and Loans.”Journal of Financial Intermediation 1 (June 1991), 257–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. “The Gains and Losses from Industrial Concentration.”Journal of Law and Economics 20 (October 1977), 229–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R.S., and Rubinfeld, D.L.Econometric & Models and Economic Forecasts, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, N., Grabowski, R., Aly, H.Y., and Pasurka, C. “The Technical Efficiency of U.S. Banks.”Economic Letters 28 (1988), 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusen, E. “Mutual Banks and Stock Banks.”Journal of Law and Economics 31 (October 1988), 395–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, S.A. “Evidence on the Size of Banking Markets from Mortgage Loan Rates in Twenty Cities.”Federal Reserve Bulletin 78 (February 1992), 117–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealey, C.W., Jr., and Lindley, J.T. “Inputs, Outputs, and the Theory of Production and Cost at Depository Financial Institutions,”Journal of Finance 32 (1977), 1251–1266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirlock, M. “Evidence on the (Non) Relationship Between Concentration and Profitability in Banking.”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 17 (February 1985), 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stansell, S.R., and Hollas, D.R. “An Examination of the Relative Economic Efficiency of Mutual vs. Stock Savings Institutions.”The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 3 (March 1990), 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirlock, M., and Marshall, W. “Monopoly Power and Expense-Preference Behavior: Theory and Evidence to the Contrary.”The Bell Journal of Economics (Spring 1983), 166–178.

  • Verbrugge, J.A., and Jahera, J.S., Jr. “Expense-Preference Behavior in the Savings and Loan Industry.”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 13 (November 1981), 475–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. “Managerial Discretion and Business Behavior.”American Economic Review 53 (December 1963), 1032–1057.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cebenoyan, A.S., Cooperman, E.S., Register, C.A. et al. The relative efficiency of stock versus mutual S&Ls: A stochastic cost frontier approach. J Finan Serv Res 7, 151–170 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046903

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046903

Keywords

Navigation