Skip to main content
Log in

Zur Anwendbarkeit von Ringstrommodellen in der Konformationsanalyse

Concerning the applicability of ring current models in conformational analysis Gezielte Konformationsänderungen an cyclischen Systemen, 9. Mitt.

  • Organisches Chemie und Biochemie
  • Published:
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The classical (Johnson-Bovey) and quantum mechanical (Haigh-Mallion) approach accounting for the shielding contribution to protons in the proximity of aromatic nuclei are compared with respect to their applicability in conformational analysis. This is accomplished by means of the1H-NMR spectra of various cyclophanes their geometries being fairly well known from X-ray data or other independent methods. The chemical shifts of the monitor protons (all of them being situated above or below the plane of the benzene ring considered) are consistent with shielding effects predicted by the classical theory notwithstanding the fact that the benzene hexagons are not strictly planar in any of these systems. In contrast, the quantum mechanical treatment considerably underestimates the shielding of protons in those regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. 8. Mitt.:H. Keller, Ch. Krieger, E. Langer undH. Lehner, Mh. Chem.107, 1281 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Pauling, J. Chem. Phys.4, 673 (1936).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. J. Dauben, jr., J. D. Wilson undJ. L. Laity, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.90, 811 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Garrat undP. Vollhard, Aromatizität. Stuttgart: Thieme. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. W. Emsley, J. Feeney undL. H. Sutcliffe, High Resolution NMR-Spectroscopy, Bd. 1 und 2. Pergamon Press. 1966; Tabelle; ibid.J. W. Emsley, J. Feeney undL. H. Sutcliffe, High Resolution NMR-Spectroscopy, Bd. 1, Appendix B.

  6. J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys.24, 1111 (1956); Mol. Phys.1, 175 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. I. Musher, J. Chem. Phys.11, 4081 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. S. Waugh undR. W. Fessenden, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.79, 846 (1957);J. S. Waugh, ibid. J. Amer. Chem. Soc.80, 6697 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C. E. Johnson undF. A. Bovey, J. Chem. Phys.29, 1012 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. F. London, J. Phys. Radium8, 397 (1937).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. McWeeny, Mol. Phys.1, 311 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. W. Haigh undR. B. Mallion, Mol. Phys.22, 955 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. C. W. Haigh undR. B. Mallion, Org. Magn. Reson.4, 203 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. C. W. Haigh, R. B. Mallion undE. A. G. Armour, Mol. Phys.18, 751 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. B. Mallion, J. Chem. Soc.B 1971, 681.

  16. N. Johnatan, S. Gordon undB. P. Daily, J. Chem. Phys.36, 2443 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. B. P. Daily, J. Chem. Phys.41, 2304 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W. H. Laarhoven undR. J. F. Nivard, Tetrahedron32, 2445 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. P. I. Rose, Org. Magn. Reson.5, 187 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. E. Bernaert, M. Anteunis undD. Tavernier, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg.83, 357 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Langer undH. Lehner, Mh. Chem.107, 1 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Lonsdale, H. J. Milledge undK. V. K. Rao, Proc. Roy. Soc.A 255, 82 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. P. K. Gantzel undK. N. Trueblood, Acta Cryst.A 18, 958 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. C. J. Brown, J. Chem. Soc.1953, 3278.

  25. R. H. Boyd, J. Chem. Phys.49, 2574 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. D. T. Hefelfinger undD. J. Cram, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.93, 4754 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. H. Keller, Dissertation, Wien 1977.

  28. H. Lehner, Mh. Chem.107, 565 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. D. J. Wilson, V. Boekelheide undR. W. Griffin, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.82, 6302 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Glotzmann, E. Langer undH. Lehner, Mh. Chem.105, 354 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  31. V. E. Kataev, S. G. Vul'fson, A. N. Vereshchagin, M. Anteunis, D. Tavernier undN. Hosten, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg.85, 103 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. D. J. Cram undR. C. Helgeson, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.88, 3515 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. H. Falk, K. Grubmayr, O. Hofer undF. Neufingerl, Mh. Chem.106, 991 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mit 2 Abbildungen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, H., Langer, E. & Lehner, H. Zur Anwendbarkeit von Ringstrommodellen in der Konformationsanalyse. Monatshefte für Chemie 108, 1371–1378 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046451

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046451

Navigation