Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison theorems for diffusion processes

  • Published:
Journal of Theoretical Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove comparison theorems for diffusion processes onR d. From these theorems we derive lower and upper bounds for the transition probabilities of a diffusion process. In contrast to the known estimates for fundamental solutions of parabolic equations our bounds do not depend on the moduli of continuity of the coefficients of the differential operator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aronson, D. G. (1967). Bounds for the fundamental solution of a parabolic equation.Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 13, 890–896.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chavel, J. (1984).Eigenvalues in Riemannian Geometry, Academic Press, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dynkin, E. B. (1961).Die Grundlagen der Theorie der Markoffschen Prozesse, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fabes, E. B., and Kenig, C. E. (1981). Examples of singular parabolic measures and singular transition probability densities.Duke Math. J. 48, 845–856.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman, A. (1964).Partial Differential Equations of Parabolic Type, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kröger, P. (1986). Vergleichssätze für Diffusionsprozesse. Thesis. Erlangen.

  7. Kröger, P. (1987). Comparaison de diffusions.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I 305, 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krylov, N. V. (1972). Control of a solution of a stochastic integral equation.Theory Prob. Appl. 17, 114–131.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krylov, N. V. (1973). On the selection of a Markov process from a system of processes and the construction of quasidiffusion processes.Math. USSR Izv. 7, 691–709.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, A. D., and Výborný, R. (1986). Some remarks on functions with one-sided derivatives.Am. Math. Monthly 93, 471–475.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Natanson, I. P. (1955).Theory of Functions of a Real Variable, Ungar, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips, R. S. (1953). Perturbation theory for semigroups of linear operators.Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 74, 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stroock, D. W. (1970). On certain systems of parabolic equations.Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 23, 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stroock, D. W., and Varadhan, S. R. S. (1969). Diffusion processes with continuous coefficients I, II.Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 22, 345–400, 479–530.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stroock, D. W., and Varadhan, S. R. S. (1972). Diffusion processes. In Le Cam, L. M., Neyman, J., and Scott, E. L. (Eds.),Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Math. Statist. and Prob., Vol. III, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stroock, D. W., and Varadhan, S. R. S. (1979).Multidimensional Diffusion Processes, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yan, J.-A. (1988). A perturbation theorem for semigroups of linear operators. In Azéma, J., Meyer, P. A., and Yor, M. (Eds.),Séminaire de Probabilités XXII, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1321, Berlin, pp. 89–91.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kröger, P. Comparison theorems for diffusion processes. J Theor Probab 3, 515–531 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046093

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046093

Key words

Navigation