Ameyaw-Akumfi, C., andHazlett, B.A. 1975. Sex recognition in the crayfishProcambarus clarkil.Science 190:1225–1226.
Google Scholar
Caldwell, R.L. 1985. A test of individual recognition in the stomopodGonodactylus festae.Anim. Behav. 33:101–106.
Google Scholar
Cook, S.B. 1969. Experiments on homing in the limpetSiphonaria normalis.Anim. Behav. 17:679–682.
Google Scholar
Cook, A., Bamford, O.S., Freeman, J.D.B., andTeideman, D.J. 1969. A study of the homing habit of the limpet.Anim. Behav. 17:330–339.
Google Scholar
Dunham, P.J. 1978. Sex pheromones in Crustacea.Biol. Rev. 53:555–583.
Google Scholar
Hazlett, B.A. 1984. Experimental design and ecological realism.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1281–1282.
Google Scholar
Hazlett, B.A. 1985. Chemical detection of sex and condition in the crayfishOrconectes virilis.J. Chem. Ecol. 11:181–189.
Google Scholar
Ilse, D.R. 1955. Olfactory marking in two young male loris,Loris tardigradus lydekkerianus, kept in captivity in Poona.Br. J. Anim. Behav. 3:118–120.
Google Scholar
Itagaki, H., andThorp, J.H. 1981. Laboratory experiments to determine if crayfish can communicate chemically in a flow-through system.J. Chem. Ecol. 7:115–126.
Google Scholar
Kleiman, D. 1966. Scent marking in the Canidae.Symp. Zool. Soc. London 18:167–177.
Google Scholar
Lecomte, J. 1956. Über die Bildung von “Strassen” durch Sammelbienen, deren Stock um 180 ° gedrecht wurde.Z. Beinenforsch. 3:128–133.
Google Scholar
Little, E.E. 1975. Chemical communication in maternal behaviour of crayfish.Nature 255:400–401.
Google Scholar
Markl, H. 1985. Manipulation, modulation, information, cognition: Some of the riddles of communication, pp. 163–194,in E. Hölldobler and M. Lindauer (eds.). Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (Fortschritte der Zoologie, Band 31), Gustav-Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 488 pp.
Google Scholar
McCumber, L.J., andClem, L.W. 1983. Recognition of non-self in crustaceans.Am. Zool 23:173–183.
Google Scholar
Quinn, T.P., andBusack, C.A. 1985. Chemosensory recognition of siblings in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch).Anim. Behav. 33:51–56.
Google Scholar
Rose, R.D. 1982. On the nature of chemical communication by crayfish in a laboratory controlled flow-through system.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1065–1071.
Google Scholar
Rose, R.D. 1984. Chemical communication in crayfish: Physiological ecology, realism and experimental design.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1289–1291.
Google Scholar
Rose R.D., andCasper, K. 1980. Pheromonal recognition of the female crayfish,Procambarus clarkii.Am. Zool. 20:853.
Google Scholar
Seitz, E. 1969. Die Bedeutung geruchlicher Orientierung beimPlumplori nycticebus coucang Boddaert 1758 (Prosimii, Lorisidae).Z. Tierpsychol. 26:73–103.
Google Scholar
Teague, P., andFriou, G. 1964. Lack of immunological responses by an invertebrate.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 12:471–478.
Google Scholar
Thorp, J.H. 1978. Agonistic behavior in crayfish in relation to temperature and reproductive period.Oecologia 36:273–280.
Google Scholar
Thorp, J.H. 1984. Theory and practice in crayfish communication studies.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1283–1287.
Google Scholar
Thorp, J.H., andItagakj, H. 1982. Verification versus falsification of existing theory: Analysis of possible chemical communication in crayfish.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1073–1077.
Google Scholar
Tierney, A.J., andDunham, D.W. 1982. Chemical communication in the reproductive isolation of the crayfishesOrconectes propinquus andOrconectes virilis (Decapoda, Cambridae).J. Crust. Biol. 2:544–548.
Google Scholar
Tierney, A.J., Thompson, C.S., andDunham, D.W. 1984. Site of pheromone reception in the crayfishOrconectes propinquus (Decopoda, Cambridae).J. Crust. Biol. 4:554–559.
Google Scholar