Abstract
On January 1, 1985, the mandatory seat belt law went into effect in New York State; violators were now subject to a fine of $50.00. Police officers issued nonpenalty-based warnings during the month prior to the law's imposition. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of the warning versus the fine and a fine-plus-prompt condition (the prompt delivered by the experimenters) on seat belt use on a university campus. Results indicated that significantly more drivers used their sear belts during the fine conditions as compared with the warning condition and that significantly more female drivers used their seat belt during all conditions. A significant difference was not found, however, between the fine and fine-plus-prompt conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonnie, R. J. (1985). The efficacy of law as a paternalistic instrument. In G. B. Melton (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation: The law as a behavioral instrument. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Geller, E. S. (1983). Rewarding seat belt usage at an industrial setting: Tests of treatment generality and response maintenance.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 189–202.
Geller, E. S., (1985, May). Seat belt psychology,Psychology Today, 12–13.
Geller, E. S., Paterson, L., & Talbott, E. (1982). A behavioral analysis of incentive prompts for motivating seat belt use.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 403–415.
Gibbs, J. P. (1985). Deterrence theory and research. In G. B. Melton (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation: The law as a behavioral instrument. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Graham, J. D., & Henrion, M. (1984). A probabilistic analysis of the passive-restraint question.Risk analysis, 4, 25–39.
Highway Safety Research Center. (1984). Belts—Questions and answers.Highway Safety Highlights, 10, 1.
Jonah, B. A., & Lawson, J. J. (1984). The effectiveness of the Canadian mandatory seat belt use laws.Accident Analysis and Prevention, 16, 433–450.
Lund, A., & Zador, P. (1984). Mandatory belt use and driver risk-taking.Risk Analysis, 4, 41–54
Robertson, L. S., Kelley, A., O'Neill, B., Wixon, B., Eisworth, R., & Haddon, W., Jr. (1974). A controlled study of the efect of television messages on seat belt use.American Journal of Public Health, 64, 1071–1080.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We gratefully acknowledge the comments of Michael Leippe on an earlier draft of this manuseript.
About this article
Cite this article
Kalfus, G.R., Ferrari, J.R., Arean, P. et al. An examination of the New York mandatory seat belt law on a university campus. Law Hum Behav 11, 63–67 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044840
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044840