Abstract
During the past decade the courts have taken an increasingly active rule in shaping the physical facilities that house environmentally captive individuals. Perhaps the most influential of these cases was Wyatt v. Stickney (1972), which has been cited as a basis for standards promulgated by other courts (e.g., Davis v. Hubbard, 1980), for model standards (Staff, 1977), and for changes made by administrators fearing litigation (Sommer & Kroll, 1979). Despite this widespread acceptance, there was no apparent empirical basis for, or validation of, the standards. The purpose of the present study was to assess the validity of the behavioral assumptions underlying the Wyatt standards regarding physical changes intended to ensure patient privacy. Patient perceptions of privacy were examined on two units in a facility that met the standards mandated in Wyatt. The results demonstrated that although some of the court's assumptions were valid, several were not, and that overall the standards in this influential case do not ensure patient privacy for the institutionalized mentally ill. The implications of these findings are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, I. (1975).The environment and social behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Baum, A., Reiss, M., & O'Hara, J. (1974). Architectural variants of reaction to spatial invasion.Environment and Behavior, 6, 91–100.
Bisbee, C. (1977). Implementing the Wyatt standards at Bryce Hospital.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 28(5), 356–361.
Davis v. Hubbard, 506 F. Supp. 915 (1980).
Drake, J. (1982). Judicial implementation and Wyatt'v. Stickney.Alabama Law Review, 32, 299–312.
Endicott, J., Spitzer, R., Fleiss, J., & Cohen, J. (1976). The Global Assessment Scale: A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance.Archives of General Psychiatry, 33(6), 766–771.
Flakes v. Percy, 511 F.Supp. 1325 (1981).
Goffman, E. (1961).Asylums, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Hoffman, P., Browning, B., & Dunn, R. (1975). Beyond Rouse and Wyatt: An administrative law model for expanding and implementing the mental patient's right to treatment.Virgina Law Review, 61, 297–339.
Holahan, C., & Saegert, S. (1973). Behavioral and attitudinal effects of large scale variation in the physical environment of psychiatric wards.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 454–462.
Holahan, C., & Slaikeu, K. (1977). Effects of contrasting degrees of privacy on client self-disclosure in a counseling setting.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 24, 35–59.
Katz v. U.S., 389 US 347 (1967).
Kleeman, W. (1981).The challenge of interior design. Boston: CBI Publishing.
Kuper, L. (1976). Neighbors on the hearth. In H. Proshansky, W. Ittelson & L. Rivlin (Eds.),Environmental psychology: People and their physical settings (pp. 244–254). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Leaf, P. (1977). Wyatt v. Stickney: Assessing the impact in Alabama.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 28(5), 351–356.
Osmond, H. (1957). Function as a basis of psychiatric ward design.Mental Hospitals, 8, 23–29.
Paul v. Davis, 44 USLW 4337 (1976).
Pugh v. Locke, 406 F.Supp. 318 (1976).
Ricci v. Okin, 537 F.Supp. 817 (1982).
Sommer, R., & Kroll, B. (1979). Mental patients and nurses rate habitability. In C. Canter & S. Canter (Eds.),Designing for therapeutic environments (pp. 186–204). New York: Wiley.
Staff. (1977). Legal issues in state mental health care.Mental Disability Law Reporter, Sept., pp. 291–305.
Sundstrom, E., Burt, R., & Karp, D. (1980). Privacy at work: Architectural correlates of job satisfaction and job performance.Academy of Management Journal, 23, 104–113.
Wolfe, M. (1975). Room size, group size, and density,Environment and Behavior, 7(2), 199–224.
Wolfe, M., & Golan, M. (1976). Privacy and institutionalization. Paper presented at the meeting of the Environmental Design Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
Wyatt v. Stickney, 344 F.Supp. 387 (1972).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this manuscript was supported by grant No. 1F32 MH 99237-01 from the National Institute of Mental Health. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the patients and staff of Arizona State Hospital, particularly Dr. Ron Holler.
About this article
Cite this article
O'Reilly, J., Sales, B. Privacy for the institutionalized mentally ill. Law Hum Behav 11, 41–53 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044838
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044838