Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The reorganization of the professions by regulation

  • Articles
  • A Historical and Theoretical Perspective
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

This paper briefly notes recent efforts at regulating the professions, distinguishing regulation by the market, by the bureaucracy and by collegial mandate. It attempts to assess regulation by first evaluating and then rejecting the theories of deprofessionalization and of proletarianization. This paper suggests that while the essential corporate autonomy of professions is not being affected by regulatory activities, traditionally “free” professions like law, medicine, and dentistry are being reorganized into a formal system of stratification. Consequently, a formal professional elite is being created that develops standards enforced to govern the performance of the rank-and-file professional worker. Possible consequences are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronowitz, S.False promises, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350, (1977).

  • Freidson, E.Patients' views of medical practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. (Originally published 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773 (1975).

  • Haug, M. R. Deprofessionalization: An alternative hypothesis for the future.Sociological Review Monographs, 1973, No. 20, 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, M. R. The deprofessionalization of everyone?Sociological Focus 1975,8, 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, M. R. Computer technology and the obsolescence of the concept of profession. In M. R. Haug & J. Dofny (Eds.),Work and Technology. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissam, P. C. Antitrust law, the First Amendment and professional self-regulation of technical quality. In R. D. Blair & S. Rubin (Eds.),Regulating the professions. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books, 1980, pp. 143–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. S. Proletarianization and educated labor.Theory and Society, 1980,9, 131–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, C. K.Health care guidance. New York: Praeger, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Society of Professional Engineers v. U.S., 435 U.S. 679 (1978).

  • Oppenheimer, M. The proletarianization of the professional.Sociological Review Monographs, 1973, No. 20, 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, New York University, 269 Mercer Street, 4th floor, 10003, New York, New York

    Eliot Freidson

Authors
  1. Eliot Freidson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Freidson, E. The reorganization of the professions by regulation. Law Hum Behav 7, 279–290 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044529

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044529

Keywords

Search

Navigation