Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How effective is medical self-regulation?

  • Articles
  • The Impact of Ethical Codes and Disciplinary Bodies
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

Licensing and disciplining of physicians, police powers of the individual states, are carried out by boards and committees, the majority of whose members are physicians. How effective is medical self-regulation? I attempt to answer this question by examining several aspects of the disciplinary process such as the medical practice acts, inconsistencies in disciplinary actions, and the number and proportion of doctors disciplined during various periods. Also included in this study is an examination of obstacles to discipline, many of which are caused by hospitals and organized medicine. I conclude that medical self-regulation is of limited effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arizona Revised statutes annotated §§ 32–1451 to 1471 (West 1976).

  • Boykin, P. R. Personal Communication, March, 1975.

  • Cohen, H. S. On professional power and conflict of interest: state licensing boards on trial,Journal of Health, Politics, Policy, and Law, 1980,5, 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire, R. C.Medical Licensure and discipline in the United States. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire, R. C. Physician competence. What is the problem? What are the answers?New York State Journal of Medicine, 1979,79, 1028–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States. Report of disciplinary actions, Ft. Worth, Texas, 1981.

  • Florida Statutes Annotated § 69–205 (2) (West 1965 & Cum. Supp. 1977).

  • Friedman, M.Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, W. S., and Sullivan, A. The Mikado, or the Town of Titipu. London, 1855.

  • Glaspel, C. J. Problems in narcotic addiction.Federation Bulletin 1958,45, 200–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical World News, How well does medicine police itself? 1974,March 15, 62–73.

  • Kansas State Board of the Healing Arts v. Foote, 200 Kan. 447, 453–454, 436 P.2d 828, 833 (1968).

  • New York Times, Sept. 24, 1981.

  • U.S. Constitution, amendment X. 1791.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States, Coronado Station, P.O. Box 5587, 87502, Santa Fe, New Mexico

    Robert C. Derbyshire (Past President)

Authors
  1. Robert C. Derbyshire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Derbyshire, R.C. How effective is medical self-regulation?. Law Hum Behav 7, 193–202 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044523

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044523

Keywords

Search

Navigation